Every relation R on {0,1} satisfies R ; R ⊆ R. [on hold]
-3
Every relation R on {0,1} satisfies R ; R ⊆ R.
I think this would be the case right?
elementary-set-theory
asked Jan 3 at 23:36
Richard Cameron
11
New contributor
Richard Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Eevee Trainer, Shailesh, zipirovich, Leucippus Jan 4 at 2:11
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, Shailesh, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
-3
Every relation R on {0,1} satisfies R ; R ⊆ R.
I think this would be the case right?
elementary-set-theory
asked Jan 3 at 23:36
Richard Cameron
11
New contributor
Richard Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Eevee Trainer, Shailesh, zipirovich, Leucippus Jan 4 at 2:11
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, Shailesh, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
This is of course true for arbitrary sets (or classes) $R$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 3 at 23:37
4
What does the notation $R,;,R$ mean?
– Mike Earnest
Jan 3 at 23:42
It means composition.
– Berci
Jan 4 at 1:39
add a comment |
-3
-3
-3
Every relation R on {0,1} satisfies R ; R ⊆ R.
I think this would be the case right?
elementary-set-theory
asked Jan 3 at 23:36
Richard Cameron
11
New contributor
Richard Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Every relation R on {0,1} satisfies R ; R ⊆ R.
I think this would be the case right?
elementary-set-theory
elementary-set-theory
asked Jan 3 at 23:36
Richard Cameron
11
New contributor
Richard Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 3 at 23:36
Richard Cameron
11
New contributor
Richard Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 3 at 23:36
Richard Cameron
11
New contributor
Richard Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 3 at 23:36
Richard Cameron
11
asked Jan 3 at 23:36
Richard Cameron
11
11
New contributor
Richard Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Richard Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Richard Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Eevee Trainer, Shailesh, zipirovich, Leucippus Jan 4 at 2:11
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, Shailesh, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, Eevee Trainer, Shailesh, zipirovich, Leucippus Jan 4 at 2:11
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, Shailesh, Leucippus
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
This is of course true for arbitrary sets (or classes) $R$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 3 at 23:37
4
What does the notation $R,;,R$ mean?
– Mike Earnest
Jan 3 at 23:42
It means composition.
– Berci
Jan 4 at 1:39
add a comment |
2
This is of course true for arbitrary sets (or classes) $R$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 3 at 23:37
4
What does the notation $R,;,R$ mean?
– Mike Earnest
Jan 3 at 23:42
It means composition.
– Berci
Jan 4 at 1:39
2
2
This is of course true for arbitrary sets (or classes) $R$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 3 at 23:37
This is of course true for arbitrary sets (or classes) $R$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 3 at 23:37
4
4
What does the notation $R,;,R$ mean?
– Mike Earnest
Jan 3 at 23:42
What does the notation $R,;,R$ mean?
– Mike Earnest
Jan 3 at 23:42
It means composition.
– Berci
Jan 4 at 1:39
It means composition.
– Berci
Jan 4 at 1:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
2
No.
Let $R:={(0,1), (1,0)}$. Then $0,R,1,R,0$ but $(0,0)notin R$.
answered Jan 4 at 1:39
Berci
59.7k23672
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
2
No.
Let $R:={(0,1), (1,0)}$. Then $0,R,1,R,0$ but $(0,0)notin R$.
answered Jan 4 at 1:39
Berci
59.7k23672
add a comment |
2
No.
Let $R:={(0,1), (1,0)}$. Then $0,R,1,R,0$ but $(0,0)notin R$.
answered Jan 4 at 1:39
Berci
59.7k23672
add a comment |
2
2
2
No.
Let $R:={(0,1), (1,0)}$. Then $0,R,1,R,0$ but $(0,0)notin R$.
answered Jan 4 at 1:39
Berci
59.7k23672
No.
Let $R:={(0,1), (1,0)}$. Then $0,R,1,R,0$ but $(0,0)notin R$.
answered Jan 4 at 1:39
Berci
59.7k23672
answered Jan 4 at 1:39
Berci
59.7k23672
answered Jan 4 at 1:39
Berci
59.7k23672
answered Jan 4 at 1:39
Berci
59.7k23672
59.7k23672
add a comment |
add a comment |
2
This is of course true for arbitrary sets (or classes) $R$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 3 at 23:37
4
What does the notation $R,;,R$ mean?
– Mike Earnest
Jan 3 at 23:42
It means composition.
– Berci
Jan 4 at 1:39