Mapping the Riemann sphere with unit interval deleted to the unit disk












2














Let [0, 1] ⊂ C stand for the closed interval between 0 and 1, and Ω =
C [0, 1] ∪ {∞} a subset of the Riemann sphere. Find a biholomorphic map of Ω on the unit disc.



The Riemann sphere with the real unit interval deleted is not simply connected, so I don't see how there can be such a mapping, but if someone could give me a hint it would be much appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • The Riemann sphere without the unit interval deleted is simply connected (in the same way as the punctured sphere is simply connected).
    – 0x539
    Jan 3 at 23:38










  • Do you need an explicit map or is it sufficient to prove existence?
    – 0x539
    Jan 3 at 23:38










  • either would help, but I'm looking for a specific map
    – David Warren
    Jan 3 at 23:43
















2














Let [0, 1] ⊂ C stand for the closed interval between 0 and 1, and Ω =
C [0, 1] ∪ {∞} a subset of the Riemann sphere. Find a biholomorphic map of Ω on the unit disc.



The Riemann sphere with the real unit interval deleted is not simply connected, so I don't see how there can be such a mapping, but if someone could give me a hint it would be much appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • The Riemann sphere without the unit interval deleted is simply connected (in the same way as the punctured sphere is simply connected).
    – 0x539
    Jan 3 at 23:38










  • Do you need an explicit map or is it sufficient to prove existence?
    – 0x539
    Jan 3 at 23:38










  • either would help, but I'm looking for a specific map
    – David Warren
    Jan 3 at 23:43














2












2








2


2





Let [0, 1] ⊂ C stand for the closed interval between 0 and 1, and Ω =
C [0, 1] ∪ {∞} a subset of the Riemann sphere. Find a biholomorphic map of Ω on the unit disc.



The Riemann sphere with the real unit interval deleted is not simply connected, so I don't see how there can be such a mapping, but if someone could give me a hint it would be much appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question













Let [0, 1] ⊂ C stand for the closed interval between 0 and 1, and Ω =
C [0, 1] ∪ {∞} a subset of the Riemann sphere. Find a biholomorphic map of Ω on the unit disc.



The Riemann sphere with the real unit interval deleted is not simply connected, so I don't see how there can be such a mapping, but if someone could give me a hint it would be much appreciated.







complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 3 at 23:30









David Warren

586313




586313












  • The Riemann sphere without the unit interval deleted is simply connected (in the same way as the punctured sphere is simply connected).
    – 0x539
    Jan 3 at 23:38










  • Do you need an explicit map or is it sufficient to prove existence?
    – 0x539
    Jan 3 at 23:38










  • either would help, but I'm looking for a specific map
    – David Warren
    Jan 3 at 23:43


















  • The Riemann sphere without the unit interval deleted is simply connected (in the same way as the punctured sphere is simply connected).
    – 0x539
    Jan 3 at 23:38










  • Do you need an explicit map or is it sufficient to prove existence?
    – 0x539
    Jan 3 at 23:38










  • either would help, but I'm looking for a specific map
    – David Warren
    Jan 3 at 23:43
















The Riemann sphere without the unit interval deleted is simply connected (in the same way as the punctured sphere is simply connected).
– 0x539
Jan 3 at 23:38




The Riemann sphere without the unit interval deleted is simply connected (in the same way as the punctured sphere is simply connected).
– 0x539
Jan 3 at 23:38












Do you need an explicit map or is it sufficient to prove existence?
– 0x539
Jan 3 at 23:38




Do you need an explicit map or is it sufficient to prove existence?
– 0x539
Jan 3 at 23:38












either would help, but I'm looking for a specific map
– David Warren
Jan 3 at 23:43




either would help, but I'm looking for a specific map
– David Warren
Jan 3 at 23:43










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














The existence of such a mapping follows immediately from the Riemann mapping theorem, since it basically says that any simply connected subset of the Riemann sphere which does not contain at least two points of the sphere is biholomorphically equivalent to the unit disk.



I will construct such a mapping in three steps:
Firstly, $f(z) = 1/z$ maps $mathbb{C} cup {infty} setminus [0, 1]$ to $mathbb{C} cup {infty} setminus [1, infty] = mathbb{C} setminus [1, infty)$.
Secondly, $g(z) = sqrt{z - 1}$ maps $mathbb{C} setminus [1, infty)$ to the upper half plane ${z in mathbb{C} | operatorname{Im} z > 0}$.
Finally, $h(z) = frac{z-i}{z + i}$, the Cayley transform, maps the upper half plane to the unit disk.



$f, g, h$ are biholomorphic on their respective domains, so $h circ g circ f$ does the job. Explicitly, $(h circ g circ f)(z) = frac{sqrt{1/z - 1} - i}{sqrt{1/z - 1} + i} = left(sqrt{1 - z} - i sqrt{z} right)^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061148%2fmapping-the-riemann-sphere-with-unit-interval-deleted-to-the-unit-disk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    The existence of such a mapping follows immediately from the Riemann mapping theorem, since it basically says that any simply connected subset of the Riemann sphere which does not contain at least two points of the sphere is biholomorphically equivalent to the unit disk.



    I will construct such a mapping in three steps:
    Firstly, $f(z) = 1/z$ maps $mathbb{C} cup {infty} setminus [0, 1]$ to $mathbb{C} cup {infty} setminus [1, infty] = mathbb{C} setminus [1, infty)$.
    Secondly, $g(z) = sqrt{z - 1}$ maps $mathbb{C} setminus [1, infty)$ to the upper half plane ${z in mathbb{C} | operatorname{Im} z > 0}$.
    Finally, $h(z) = frac{z-i}{z + i}$, the Cayley transform, maps the upper half plane to the unit disk.



    $f, g, h$ are biholomorphic on their respective domains, so $h circ g circ f$ does the job. Explicitly, $(h circ g circ f)(z) = frac{sqrt{1/z - 1} - i}{sqrt{1/z - 1} + i} = left(sqrt{1 - z} - i sqrt{z} right)^2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      3














      The existence of such a mapping follows immediately from the Riemann mapping theorem, since it basically says that any simply connected subset of the Riemann sphere which does not contain at least two points of the sphere is biholomorphically equivalent to the unit disk.



      I will construct such a mapping in three steps:
      Firstly, $f(z) = 1/z$ maps $mathbb{C} cup {infty} setminus [0, 1]$ to $mathbb{C} cup {infty} setminus [1, infty] = mathbb{C} setminus [1, infty)$.
      Secondly, $g(z) = sqrt{z - 1}$ maps $mathbb{C} setminus [1, infty)$ to the upper half plane ${z in mathbb{C} | operatorname{Im} z > 0}$.
      Finally, $h(z) = frac{z-i}{z + i}$, the Cayley transform, maps the upper half plane to the unit disk.



      $f, g, h$ are biholomorphic on their respective domains, so $h circ g circ f$ does the job. Explicitly, $(h circ g circ f)(z) = frac{sqrt{1/z - 1} - i}{sqrt{1/z - 1} + i} = left(sqrt{1 - z} - i sqrt{z} right)^2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        3












        3








        3






        The existence of such a mapping follows immediately from the Riemann mapping theorem, since it basically says that any simply connected subset of the Riemann sphere which does not contain at least two points of the sphere is biholomorphically equivalent to the unit disk.



        I will construct such a mapping in three steps:
        Firstly, $f(z) = 1/z$ maps $mathbb{C} cup {infty} setminus [0, 1]$ to $mathbb{C} cup {infty} setminus [1, infty] = mathbb{C} setminus [1, infty)$.
        Secondly, $g(z) = sqrt{z - 1}$ maps $mathbb{C} setminus [1, infty)$ to the upper half plane ${z in mathbb{C} | operatorname{Im} z > 0}$.
        Finally, $h(z) = frac{z-i}{z + i}$, the Cayley transform, maps the upper half plane to the unit disk.



        $f, g, h$ are biholomorphic on their respective domains, so $h circ g circ f$ does the job. Explicitly, $(h circ g circ f)(z) = frac{sqrt{1/z - 1} - i}{sqrt{1/z - 1} + i} = left(sqrt{1 - z} - i sqrt{z} right)^2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        The existence of such a mapping follows immediately from the Riemann mapping theorem, since it basically says that any simply connected subset of the Riemann sphere which does not contain at least two points of the sphere is biholomorphically equivalent to the unit disk.



        I will construct such a mapping in three steps:
        Firstly, $f(z) = 1/z$ maps $mathbb{C} cup {infty} setminus [0, 1]$ to $mathbb{C} cup {infty} setminus [1, infty] = mathbb{C} setminus [1, infty)$.
        Secondly, $g(z) = sqrt{z - 1}$ maps $mathbb{C} setminus [1, infty)$ to the upper half plane ${z in mathbb{C} | operatorname{Im} z > 0}$.
        Finally, $h(z) = frac{z-i}{z + i}$, the Cayley transform, maps the upper half plane to the unit disk.



        $f, g, h$ are biholomorphic on their respective domains, so $h circ g circ f$ does the job. Explicitly, $(h circ g circ f)(z) = frac{sqrt{1/z - 1} - i}{sqrt{1/z - 1} + i} = left(sqrt{1 - z} - i sqrt{z} right)^2$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago

























        answered Jan 3 at 23:48









        0x539

        1,047316




        1,047316






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061148%2fmapping-the-riemann-sphere-with-unit-interval-deleted-to-the-unit-disk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            1300-talet

            1300-talet

            Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8