If $a^3 equiv b^3pmod{11}$ then $a equiv b pmod{11}$. [on hold]












2















If $a^3 equiv b^3pmod{11}$ then $a equiv b pmod{11}$.




I verified the above statement for smaller values of $a$ and $b$ but I am unable to prove it in general. Please prove or disprove it. Can we replace $11$ by any other integer?










share|cite|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by user21820, Did, amWhy, Lee David Chung Lin, KReiser 21 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – user21820, Did, amWhy, Lee David Chung Lin, KReiser

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















    2















    If $a^3 equiv b^3pmod{11}$ then $a equiv b pmod{11}$.




    I verified the above statement for smaller values of $a$ and $b$ but I am unable to prove it in general. Please prove or disprove it. Can we replace $11$ by any other integer?










    share|cite|improve this question















    put on hold as off-topic by user21820, Did, amWhy, Lee David Chung Lin, KReiser 21 hours ago


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – user21820, Did, amWhy, Lee David Chung Lin, KReiser

    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















      2












      2








      2


      2






      If $a^3 equiv b^3pmod{11}$ then $a equiv b pmod{11}$.




      I verified the above statement for smaller values of $a$ and $b$ but I am unable to prove it in general. Please prove or disprove it. Can we replace $11$ by any other integer?










      share|cite|improve this question
















      If $a^3 equiv b^3pmod{11}$ then $a equiv b pmod{11}$.




      I verified the above statement for smaller values of $a$ and $b$ but I am unable to prove it in general. Please prove or disprove it. Can we replace $11$ by any other integer?







      elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      user21820

      38.7k543153




      38.7k543153










      asked yesterday









      prashant sharmaprashant sharma

      756




      756




      put on hold as off-topic by user21820, Did, amWhy, Lee David Chung Lin, KReiser 21 hours ago


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – user21820, Did, amWhy, Lee David Chung Lin, KReiser

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




      put on hold as off-topic by user21820, Did, amWhy, Lee David Chung Lin, KReiser 21 hours ago


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – user21820, Did, amWhy, Lee David Chung Lin, KReiser

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Here is a general statement:




          If $p$ is a prime and $m$ is coprime with $p-1$, then $a^m equiv b^m bmod p$ iff $a equiv bbmod p$.




          This follows from Fermat's theorem by writing $(p-1)(-u)+mv=1$ for $u,v in mathbb N$.



          In your example, $p=11$ and $m=3$. We can take $u=2$ and $v=7$ to get $10cdot (-2) + 3cdot(7)=1$. Write this as $1 + 10 cdot 2 = 3cdot 7 $. Then
          $$
          a equiv a cdot a^{10 cdot 2} = a^{1 + 10 cdot 2} = a^{3cdot7}
          equiv
          b^{3cdot7} = b^{1 + 10 cdot 2} = b cdot b^{10 cdot 2} equiv b
          bmod 11
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • @Ihf I think that above argument would work if both $u$ and $v$ are positive integers but it is not the case here.
            – prashant sharma
            yesterday










          • @prashantsharma, exactly one of $u,v$ is negative. Move the corresponding therm to the other side.
            – lhf
            yesterday












          • @Ihf Let's take $m = 3$, $p = 11$. Then one possible ordered pair of $(u, v)$ is $(1, -3)$. So we have $a^{10} equiv b^{10}$(mod $11$) and $a^{-9} equiv b^{-9}$(mod $11$) and we multiply both congruences then we get $a equiv b$(mod $11$). But second congruence is meaning less as exponents are negative.
            – prashant sharma
            yesterday










          • @prashantsharma, negative exponents do make sense but anyway see my edited answer.
            – lhf
            yesterday





















          1














          If $11mid ab$ we are done.



          Say $11not{mid} ab$. Then by Fermat we have $$a^{10}equiv b^{10}equiv 1pmod {11}$$



          Since $$a^{9}equiv b^{9}pmod {11}$$ we have $$a^{10}equiv ba^{9}pmod {11}$$



          so $$ 11mid a^9(a-b)implies 11mid a-b$$



          and we are done.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            0














            Note $$1^{3} equiv 2^{3}pmod{7}$$ doesnt imply $1equiv 2pmod{7}$






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • I don't understand this note. It is more like a comment, not a solution.
              – greedoid
              yesterday










            • "Can we replace 11 by any other integer" is what i have answered
              – crskhr
              yesterday




















            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            Here is a general statement:




            If $p$ is a prime and $m$ is coprime with $p-1$, then $a^m equiv b^m bmod p$ iff $a equiv bbmod p$.




            This follows from Fermat's theorem by writing $(p-1)(-u)+mv=1$ for $u,v in mathbb N$.



            In your example, $p=11$ and $m=3$. We can take $u=2$ and $v=7$ to get $10cdot (-2) + 3cdot(7)=1$. Write this as $1 + 10 cdot 2 = 3cdot 7 $. Then
            $$
            a equiv a cdot a^{10 cdot 2} = a^{1 + 10 cdot 2} = a^{3cdot7}
            equiv
            b^{3cdot7} = b^{1 + 10 cdot 2} = b cdot b^{10 cdot 2} equiv b
            bmod 11
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • @Ihf I think that above argument would work if both $u$ and $v$ are positive integers but it is not the case here.
              – prashant sharma
              yesterday










            • @prashantsharma, exactly one of $u,v$ is negative. Move the corresponding therm to the other side.
              – lhf
              yesterday












            • @Ihf Let's take $m = 3$, $p = 11$. Then one possible ordered pair of $(u, v)$ is $(1, -3)$. So we have $a^{10} equiv b^{10}$(mod $11$) and $a^{-9} equiv b^{-9}$(mod $11$) and we multiply both congruences then we get $a equiv b$(mod $11$). But second congruence is meaning less as exponents are negative.
              – prashant sharma
              yesterday










            • @prashantsharma, negative exponents do make sense but anyway see my edited answer.
              – lhf
              yesterday


















            4














            Here is a general statement:




            If $p$ is a prime and $m$ is coprime with $p-1$, then $a^m equiv b^m bmod p$ iff $a equiv bbmod p$.




            This follows from Fermat's theorem by writing $(p-1)(-u)+mv=1$ for $u,v in mathbb N$.



            In your example, $p=11$ and $m=3$. We can take $u=2$ and $v=7$ to get $10cdot (-2) + 3cdot(7)=1$. Write this as $1 + 10 cdot 2 = 3cdot 7 $. Then
            $$
            a equiv a cdot a^{10 cdot 2} = a^{1 + 10 cdot 2} = a^{3cdot7}
            equiv
            b^{3cdot7} = b^{1 + 10 cdot 2} = b cdot b^{10 cdot 2} equiv b
            bmod 11
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • @Ihf I think that above argument would work if both $u$ and $v$ are positive integers but it is not the case here.
              – prashant sharma
              yesterday










            • @prashantsharma, exactly one of $u,v$ is negative. Move the corresponding therm to the other side.
              – lhf
              yesterday












            • @Ihf Let's take $m = 3$, $p = 11$. Then one possible ordered pair of $(u, v)$ is $(1, -3)$. So we have $a^{10} equiv b^{10}$(mod $11$) and $a^{-9} equiv b^{-9}$(mod $11$) and we multiply both congruences then we get $a equiv b$(mod $11$). But second congruence is meaning less as exponents are negative.
              – prashant sharma
              yesterday










            • @prashantsharma, negative exponents do make sense but anyway see my edited answer.
              – lhf
              yesterday
















            4












            4








            4






            Here is a general statement:




            If $p$ is a prime and $m$ is coprime with $p-1$, then $a^m equiv b^m bmod p$ iff $a equiv bbmod p$.




            This follows from Fermat's theorem by writing $(p-1)(-u)+mv=1$ for $u,v in mathbb N$.



            In your example, $p=11$ and $m=3$. We can take $u=2$ and $v=7$ to get $10cdot (-2) + 3cdot(7)=1$. Write this as $1 + 10 cdot 2 = 3cdot 7 $. Then
            $$
            a equiv a cdot a^{10 cdot 2} = a^{1 + 10 cdot 2} = a^{3cdot7}
            equiv
            b^{3cdot7} = b^{1 + 10 cdot 2} = b cdot b^{10 cdot 2} equiv b
            bmod 11
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Here is a general statement:




            If $p$ is a prime and $m$ is coprime with $p-1$, then $a^m equiv b^m bmod p$ iff $a equiv bbmod p$.




            This follows from Fermat's theorem by writing $(p-1)(-u)+mv=1$ for $u,v in mathbb N$.



            In your example, $p=11$ and $m=3$. We can take $u=2$ and $v=7$ to get $10cdot (-2) + 3cdot(7)=1$. Write this as $1 + 10 cdot 2 = 3cdot 7 $. Then
            $$
            a equiv a cdot a^{10 cdot 2} = a^{1 + 10 cdot 2} = a^{3cdot7}
            equiv
            b^{3cdot7} = b^{1 + 10 cdot 2} = b cdot b^{10 cdot 2} equiv b
            bmod 11
            $$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited yesterday

























            answered yesterday









            lhflhf

            163k10167388




            163k10167388












            • @Ihf I think that above argument would work if both $u$ and $v$ are positive integers but it is not the case here.
              – prashant sharma
              yesterday










            • @prashantsharma, exactly one of $u,v$ is negative. Move the corresponding therm to the other side.
              – lhf
              yesterday












            • @Ihf Let's take $m = 3$, $p = 11$. Then one possible ordered pair of $(u, v)$ is $(1, -3)$. So we have $a^{10} equiv b^{10}$(mod $11$) and $a^{-9} equiv b^{-9}$(mod $11$) and we multiply both congruences then we get $a equiv b$(mod $11$). But second congruence is meaning less as exponents are negative.
              – prashant sharma
              yesterday










            • @prashantsharma, negative exponents do make sense but anyway see my edited answer.
              – lhf
              yesterday




















            • @Ihf I think that above argument would work if both $u$ and $v$ are positive integers but it is not the case here.
              – prashant sharma
              yesterday










            • @prashantsharma, exactly one of $u,v$ is negative. Move the corresponding therm to the other side.
              – lhf
              yesterday












            • @Ihf Let's take $m = 3$, $p = 11$. Then one possible ordered pair of $(u, v)$ is $(1, -3)$. So we have $a^{10} equiv b^{10}$(mod $11$) and $a^{-9} equiv b^{-9}$(mod $11$) and we multiply both congruences then we get $a equiv b$(mod $11$). But second congruence is meaning less as exponents are negative.
              – prashant sharma
              yesterday










            • @prashantsharma, negative exponents do make sense but anyway see my edited answer.
              – lhf
              yesterday


















            @Ihf I think that above argument would work if both $u$ and $v$ are positive integers but it is not the case here.
            – prashant sharma
            yesterday




            @Ihf I think that above argument would work if both $u$ and $v$ are positive integers but it is not the case here.
            – prashant sharma
            yesterday












            @prashantsharma, exactly one of $u,v$ is negative. Move the corresponding therm to the other side.
            – lhf
            yesterday






            @prashantsharma, exactly one of $u,v$ is negative. Move the corresponding therm to the other side.
            – lhf
            yesterday














            @Ihf Let's take $m = 3$, $p = 11$. Then one possible ordered pair of $(u, v)$ is $(1, -3)$. So we have $a^{10} equiv b^{10}$(mod $11$) and $a^{-9} equiv b^{-9}$(mod $11$) and we multiply both congruences then we get $a equiv b$(mod $11$). But second congruence is meaning less as exponents are negative.
            – prashant sharma
            yesterday




            @Ihf Let's take $m = 3$, $p = 11$. Then one possible ordered pair of $(u, v)$ is $(1, -3)$. So we have $a^{10} equiv b^{10}$(mod $11$) and $a^{-9} equiv b^{-9}$(mod $11$) and we multiply both congruences then we get $a equiv b$(mod $11$). But second congruence is meaning less as exponents are negative.
            – prashant sharma
            yesterday












            @prashantsharma, negative exponents do make sense but anyway see my edited answer.
            – lhf
            yesterday






            @prashantsharma, negative exponents do make sense but anyway see my edited answer.
            – lhf
            yesterday













            1














            If $11mid ab$ we are done.



            Say $11not{mid} ab$. Then by Fermat we have $$a^{10}equiv b^{10}equiv 1pmod {11}$$



            Since $$a^{9}equiv b^{9}pmod {11}$$ we have $$a^{10}equiv ba^{9}pmod {11}$$



            so $$ 11mid a^9(a-b)implies 11mid a-b$$



            and we are done.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              If $11mid ab$ we are done.



              Say $11not{mid} ab$. Then by Fermat we have $$a^{10}equiv b^{10}equiv 1pmod {11}$$



              Since $$a^{9}equiv b^{9}pmod {11}$$ we have $$a^{10}equiv ba^{9}pmod {11}$$



              so $$ 11mid a^9(a-b)implies 11mid a-b$$



              and we are done.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                If $11mid ab$ we are done.



                Say $11not{mid} ab$. Then by Fermat we have $$a^{10}equiv b^{10}equiv 1pmod {11}$$



                Since $$a^{9}equiv b^{9}pmod {11}$$ we have $$a^{10}equiv ba^{9}pmod {11}$$



                so $$ 11mid a^9(a-b)implies 11mid a-b$$



                and we are done.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                If $11mid ab$ we are done.



                Say $11not{mid} ab$. Then by Fermat we have $$a^{10}equiv b^{10}equiv 1pmod {11}$$



                Since $$a^{9}equiv b^{9}pmod {11}$$ we have $$a^{10}equiv ba^{9}pmod {11}$$



                so $$ 11mid a^9(a-b)implies 11mid a-b$$



                and we are done.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                greedoidgreedoid

                38.5k114797




                38.5k114797























                    0














                    Note $$1^{3} equiv 2^{3}pmod{7}$$ doesnt imply $1equiv 2pmod{7}$






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • I don't understand this note. It is more like a comment, not a solution.
                      – greedoid
                      yesterday










                    • "Can we replace 11 by any other integer" is what i have answered
                      – crskhr
                      yesterday


















                    0














                    Note $$1^{3} equiv 2^{3}pmod{7}$$ doesnt imply $1equiv 2pmod{7}$






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • I don't understand this note. It is more like a comment, not a solution.
                      – greedoid
                      yesterday










                    • "Can we replace 11 by any other integer" is what i have answered
                      – crskhr
                      yesterday
















                    0












                    0








                    0






                    Note $$1^{3} equiv 2^{3}pmod{7}$$ doesnt imply $1equiv 2pmod{7}$






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    Note $$1^{3} equiv 2^{3}pmod{7}$$ doesnt imply $1equiv 2pmod{7}$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    crskhrcrskhr

                    3,873925




                    3,873925












                    • I don't understand this note. It is more like a comment, not a solution.
                      – greedoid
                      yesterday










                    • "Can we replace 11 by any other integer" is what i have answered
                      – crskhr
                      yesterday




















                    • I don't understand this note. It is more like a comment, not a solution.
                      – greedoid
                      yesterday










                    • "Can we replace 11 by any other integer" is what i have answered
                      – crskhr
                      yesterday


















                    I don't understand this note. It is more like a comment, not a solution.
                    – greedoid
                    yesterday




                    I don't understand this note. It is more like a comment, not a solution.
                    – greedoid
                    yesterday












                    "Can we replace 11 by any other integer" is what i have answered
                    – crskhr
                    yesterday






                    "Can we replace 11 by any other integer" is what i have answered
                    – crskhr
                    yesterday





                    Popular posts from this blog

                    An IMO inspired problem

                    Management

                    Investment