Contour for $int_0^infty arctan(z) e^{-z^2},dz$ or some variant












5














I'm trying to practice my contour integration skills and got interested in the following integral:
$$int_0^infty arctan(z) e^{-z^2},dz$$
I know that the usual way to calculate integrals on $[0,infty)$ is to use the keyhole-contour, but the problem in this case is that $arctan(z)$ has branch points at $z=pm i$, with branch cuts usually chosen on $[i,iinfty)$ and $[-i,-iinfty)$, which I think means that the keyhole contour doesn't work in this case. I have tried a rectangle contour made up of $C:[0,R]cup [R+i/2] cup [R+i/2,i/2] cup [i/2,0]$ but that didn't work out. Because my function is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}setminus [i,iinfty) cap [-i,-iinfty)$ there also wouldn't be any residues to calculate, which doesn't necessarily have to be a problem as Cauchy's theorem could be used to try and compute the integral.



If I'm not mistaken, I would then get somerhing like $int_0^infty f(x)-f(x+i/2),dx=0$. One difficulty I ran into is simplify $f(z+i/2)$ (where $f(z)=arctan(x) e^{-z^2}$) into some other form such as $alpha f(z)+beta g(z)$ for some $g(z)$ whose integral can be calculated on $[0,infty)$ and $alpha, betainmathbb{C}$. This would let me then solve for $int_0^infty f(x),dx$.



I also thought that, if that makes it easier, we could extend the range of integration to $mathbb{R}$, as long as we found an odd function $q(a,x)$, such that $q(0,x)=1$ and compute



$$lim_{ato 0} frac{1}{2} int_{-infty}^infty q(a, x) arctan(x)e^{-x^2},dx$$
We could either use Cauchy's/the Residue theorem depending on whether $q(z)$ has poles or not. I have not been able to use this approach.



Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The value of the integral is $$G_{3, 2}^{1, 3} left( 1 middle| {1, 1, frac 3 2 atop 1, frac 1 2} right),$$ $G$ being the Meijer G-function. It's unlikely to have any significantly simpler closed form, it doesn't even seem to be expressible as a sum of generalized hypergeometric functions.
    – Maxim
    Jan 3 at 1:46












  • Are we allowed to use any other method to solve this integral? 'cause the Cauchy theorem doesn't seem to be applicable here.........
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Jan 4 at 15:13
















5














I'm trying to practice my contour integration skills and got interested in the following integral:
$$int_0^infty arctan(z) e^{-z^2},dz$$
I know that the usual way to calculate integrals on $[0,infty)$ is to use the keyhole-contour, but the problem in this case is that $arctan(z)$ has branch points at $z=pm i$, with branch cuts usually chosen on $[i,iinfty)$ and $[-i,-iinfty)$, which I think means that the keyhole contour doesn't work in this case. I have tried a rectangle contour made up of $C:[0,R]cup [R+i/2] cup [R+i/2,i/2] cup [i/2,0]$ but that didn't work out. Because my function is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}setminus [i,iinfty) cap [-i,-iinfty)$ there also wouldn't be any residues to calculate, which doesn't necessarily have to be a problem as Cauchy's theorem could be used to try and compute the integral.



If I'm not mistaken, I would then get somerhing like $int_0^infty f(x)-f(x+i/2),dx=0$. One difficulty I ran into is simplify $f(z+i/2)$ (where $f(z)=arctan(x) e^{-z^2}$) into some other form such as $alpha f(z)+beta g(z)$ for some $g(z)$ whose integral can be calculated on $[0,infty)$ and $alpha, betainmathbb{C}$. This would let me then solve for $int_0^infty f(x),dx$.



I also thought that, if that makes it easier, we could extend the range of integration to $mathbb{R}$, as long as we found an odd function $q(a,x)$, such that $q(0,x)=1$ and compute



$$lim_{ato 0} frac{1}{2} int_{-infty}^infty q(a, x) arctan(x)e^{-x^2},dx$$
We could either use Cauchy's/the Residue theorem depending on whether $q(z)$ has poles or not. I have not been able to use this approach.



Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The value of the integral is $$G_{3, 2}^{1, 3} left( 1 middle| {1, 1, frac 3 2 atop 1, frac 1 2} right),$$ $G$ being the Meijer G-function. It's unlikely to have any significantly simpler closed form, it doesn't even seem to be expressible as a sum of generalized hypergeometric functions.
    – Maxim
    Jan 3 at 1:46












  • Are we allowed to use any other method to solve this integral? 'cause the Cauchy theorem doesn't seem to be applicable here.........
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Jan 4 at 15:13














5












5








5


2





I'm trying to practice my contour integration skills and got interested in the following integral:
$$int_0^infty arctan(z) e^{-z^2},dz$$
I know that the usual way to calculate integrals on $[0,infty)$ is to use the keyhole-contour, but the problem in this case is that $arctan(z)$ has branch points at $z=pm i$, with branch cuts usually chosen on $[i,iinfty)$ and $[-i,-iinfty)$, which I think means that the keyhole contour doesn't work in this case. I have tried a rectangle contour made up of $C:[0,R]cup [R+i/2] cup [R+i/2,i/2] cup [i/2,0]$ but that didn't work out. Because my function is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}setminus [i,iinfty) cap [-i,-iinfty)$ there also wouldn't be any residues to calculate, which doesn't necessarily have to be a problem as Cauchy's theorem could be used to try and compute the integral.



If I'm not mistaken, I would then get somerhing like $int_0^infty f(x)-f(x+i/2),dx=0$. One difficulty I ran into is simplify $f(z+i/2)$ (where $f(z)=arctan(x) e^{-z^2}$) into some other form such as $alpha f(z)+beta g(z)$ for some $g(z)$ whose integral can be calculated on $[0,infty)$ and $alpha, betainmathbb{C}$. This would let me then solve for $int_0^infty f(x),dx$.



I also thought that, if that makes it easier, we could extend the range of integration to $mathbb{R}$, as long as we found an odd function $q(a,x)$, such that $q(0,x)=1$ and compute



$$lim_{ato 0} frac{1}{2} int_{-infty}^infty q(a, x) arctan(x)e^{-x^2},dx$$
We could either use Cauchy's/the Residue theorem depending on whether $q(z)$ has poles or not. I have not been able to use this approach.



Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question















I'm trying to practice my contour integration skills and got interested in the following integral:
$$int_0^infty arctan(z) e^{-z^2},dz$$
I know that the usual way to calculate integrals on $[0,infty)$ is to use the keyhole-contour, but the problem in this case is that $arctan(z)$ has branch points at $z=pm i$, with branch cuts usually chosen on $[i,iinfty)$ and $[-i,-iinfty)$, which I think means that the keyhole contour doesn't work in this case. I have tried a rectangle contour made up of $C:[0,R]cup [R+i/2] cup [R+i/2,i/2] cup [i/2,0]$ but that didn't work out. Because my function is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}setminus [i,iinfty) cap [-i,-iinfty)$ there also wouldn't be any residues to calculate, which doesn't necessarily have to be a problem as Cauchy's theorem could be used to try and compute the integral.



If I'm not mistaken, I would then get somerhing like $int_0^infty f(x)-f(x+i/2),dx=0$. One difficulty I ran into is simplify $f(z+i/2)$ (where $f(z)=arctan(x) e^{-z^2}$) into some other form such as $alpha f(z)+beta g(z)$ for some $g(z)$ whose integral can be calculated on $[0,infty)$ and $alpha, betainmathbb{C}$. This would let me then solve for $int_0^infty f(x),dx$.



I also thought that, if that makes it easier, we could extend the range of integration to $mathbb{R}$, as long as we found an odd function $q(a,x)$, such that $q(0,x)=1$ and compute



$$lim_{ato 0} frac{1}{2} int_{-infty}^infty q(a, x) arctan(x)e^{-x^2},dx$$
We could either use Cauchy's/the Residue theorem depending on whether $q(z)$ has poles or not. I have not been able to use this approach.



Any ideas?







integration complex-analysis definite-integrals contour-integration complex-integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 28 '18 at 6:48







Zachary

















asked Dec 28 '18 at 6:42









ZacharyZachary

2,3071214




2,3071214












  • The value of the integral is $$G_{3, 2}^{1, 3} left( 1 middle| {1, 1, frac 3 2 atop 1, frac 1 2} right),$$ $G$ being the Meijer G-function. It's unlikely to have any significantly simpler closed form, it doesn't even seem to be expressible as a sum of generalized hypergeometric functions.
    – Maxim
    Jan 3 at 1:46












  • Are we allowed to use any other method to solve this integral? 'cause the Cauchy theorem doesn't seem to be applicable here.........
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Jan 4 at 15:13


















  • The value of the integral is $$G_{3, 2}^{1, 3} left( 1 middle| {1, 1, frac 3 2 atop 1, frac 1 2} right),$$ $G$ being the Meijer G-function. It's unlikely to have any significantly simpler closed form, it doesn't even seem to be expressible as a sum of generalized hypergeometric functions.
    – Maxim
    Jan 3 at 1:46












  • Are we allowed to use any other method to solve this integral? 'cause the Cauchy theorem doesn't seem to be applicable here.........
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Jan 4 at 15:13
















The value of the integral is $$G_{3, 2}^{1, 3} left( 1 middle| {1, 1, frac 3 2 atop 1, frac 1 2} right),$$ $G$ being the Meijer G-function. It's unlikely to have any significantly simpler closed form, it doesn't even seem to be expressible as a sum of generalized hypergeometric functions.
– Maxim
Jan 3 at 1:46






The value of the integral is $$G_{3, 2}^{1, 3} left( 1 middle| {1, 1, frac 3 2 atop 1, frac 1 2} right),$$ $G$ being the Meijer G-function. It's unlikely to have any significantly simpler closed form, it doesn't even seem to be expressible as a sum of generalized hypergeometric functions.
– Maxim
Jan 3 at 1:46














Are we allowed to use any other method to solve this integral? 'cause the Cauchy theorem doesn't seem to be applicable here.........
– Mostafa Ayaz
Jan 4 at 15:13




Are we allowed to use any other method to solve this integral? 'cause the Cauchy theorem doesn't seem to be applicable here.........
– Mostafa Ayaz
Jan 4 at 15:13










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Applying of the Residue theorem is a very hard task, because the function $e^{-x^2}$ is not bounded when $zto icdot infty.$



On the other hand, parametric method can be used.



Let us consider the integral
$$begin{align}
&I(p) = intlimits_0^inftyarctan pz, e^{-z^2},mathrm dz,\[4pt]
&I'(p) = intlimits_0^inftydfrac{ze^{-z^2}}{p^2z^2+1},mathrm dz
= dfrac12 p^{-2}intlimits_0^inftydfrac{e^{-z^2}}{z^2+p^{-2}},mathrm dz^2.\[4pt]
end{align}$$

Using known definite integral
$$int_0^inftydfrac{e^{-ay}}{b+y},mathrm dy=e^{ab}mathrm {E}_1(ab),$$
one can get
$$I'(p)=dfrac12 p^{-2}e^{p^{-2}}mathrm {E}_1(-p^2),$$
$$I(p) = dfrac12 intlimits_0^p p^{-2}e^{p^{-2}}mathrm {E}_1(-p^2) dp
= left|p=frac1t,, t=frac1p,,mathrm dt=-frac{mathrm dp}{p^2}right|
= dfrac12intlimits_{p^{-1}}^infty e^{t^2}mathrm {E}_1(t^2), dt,$$

$$boxed{I(1) = dfrac12intlimits_{1}^infty e^{t^2}mathrm {E}_1(t^2), dt}.$$
Numeric calculations give the same result $I(1)approx0.40978$ for the both expressions, but this result can not presented via elementary functions.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054635%2fcontour-for-int-0-infty-arctanz-e-z2-dz-or-some-variant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Applying of the Residue theorem is a very hard task, because the function $e^{-x^2}$ is not bounded when $zto icdot infty.$



    On the other hand, parametric method can be used.



    Let us consider the integral
    $$begin{align}
    &I(p) = intlimits_0^inftyarctan pz, e^{-z^2},mathrm dz,\[4pt]
    &I'(p) = intlimits_0^inftydfrac{ze^{-z^2}}{p^2z^2+1},mathrm dz
    = dfrac12 p^{-2}intlimits_0^inftydfrac{e^{-z^2}}{z^2+p^{-2}},mathrm dz^2.\[4pt]
    end{align}$$

    Using known definite integral
    $$int_0^inftydfrac{e^{-ay}}{b+y},mathrm dy=e^{ab}mathrm {E}_1(ab),$$
    one can get
    $$I'(p)=dfrac12 p^{-2}e^{p^{-2}}mathrm {E}_1(-p^2),$$
    $$I(p) = dfrac12 intlimits_0^p p^{-2}e^{p^{-2}}mathrm {E}_1(-p^2) dp
    = left|p=frac1t,, t=frac1p,,mathrm dt=-frac{mathrm dp}{p^2}right|
    = dfrac12intlimits_{p^{-1}}^infty e^{t^2}mathrm {E}_1(t^2), dt,$$

    $$boxed{I(1) = dfrac12intlimits_{1}^infty e^{t^2}mathrm {E}_1(t^2), dt}.$$
    Numeric calculations give the same result $I(1)approx0.40978$ for the both expressions, but this result can not presented via elementary functions.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      1














      Applying of the Residue theorem is a very hard task, because the function $e^{-x^2}$ is not bounded when $zto icdot infty.$



      On the other hand, parametric method can be used.



      Let us consider the integral
      $$begin{align}
      &I(p) = intlimits_0^inftyarctan pz, e^{-z^2},mathrm dz,\[4pt]
      &I'(p) = intlimits_0^inftydfrac{ze^{-z^2}}{p^2z^2+1},mathrm dz
      = dfrac12 p^{-2}intlimits_0^inftydfrac{e^{-z^2}}{z^2+p^{-2}},mathrm dz^2.\[4pt]
      end{align}$$

      Using known definite integral
      $$int_0^inftydfrac{e^{-ay}}{b+y},mathrm dy=e^{ab}mathrm {E}_1(ab),$$
      one can get
      $$I'(p)=dfrac12 p^{-2}e^{p^{-2}}mathrm {E}_1(-p^2),$$
      $$I(p) = dfrac12 intlimits_0^p p^{-2}e^{p^{-2}}mathrm {E}_1(-p^2) dp
      = left|p=frac1t,, t=frac1p,,mathrm dt=-frac{mathrm dp}{p^2}right|
      = dfrac12intlimits_{p^{-1}}^infty e^{t^2}mathrm {E}_1(t^2), dt,$$

      $$boxed{I(1) = dfrac12intlimits_{1}^infty e^{t^2}mathrm {E}_1(t^2), dt}.$$
      Numeric calculations give the same result $I(1)approx0.40978$ for the both expressions, but this result can not presented via elementary functions.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1






        Applying of the Residue theorem is a very hard task, because the function $e^{-x^2}$ is not bounded when $zto icdot infty.$



        On the other hand, parametric method can be used.



        Let us consider the integral
        $$begin{align}
        &I(p) = intlimits_0^inftyarctan pz, e^{-z^2},mathrm dz,\[4pt]
        &I'(p) = intlimits_0^inftydfrac{ze^{-z^2}}{p^2z^2+1},mathrm dz
        = dfrac12 p^{-2}intlimits_0^inftydfrac{e^{-z^2}}{z^2+p^{-2}},mathrm dz^2.\[4pt]
        end{align}$$

        Using known definite integral
        $$int_0^inftydfrac{e^{-ay}}{b+y},mathrm dy=e^{ab}mathrm {E}_1(ab),$$
        one can get
        $$I'(p)=dfrac12 p^{-2}e^{p^{-2}}mathrm {E}_1(-p^2),$$
        $$I(p) = dfrac12 intlimits_0^p p^{-2}e^{p^{-2}}mathrm {E}_1(-p^2) dp
        = left|p=frac1t,, t=frac1p,,mathrm dt=-frac{mathrm dp}{p^2}right|
        = dfrac12intlimits_{p^{-1}}^infty e^{t^2}mathrm {E}_1(t^2), dt,$$

        $$boxed{I(1) = dfrac12intlimits_{1}^infty e^{t^2}mathrm {E}_1(t^2), dt}.$$
        Numeric calculations give the same result $I(1)approx0.40978$ for the both expressions, but this result can not presented via elementary functions.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Applying of the Residue theorem is a very hard task, because the function $e^{-x^2}$ is not bounded when $zto icdot infty.$



        On the other hand, parametric method can be used.



        Let us consider the integral
        $$begin{align}
        &I(p) = intlimits_0^inftyarctan pz, e^{-z^2},mathrm dz,\[4pt]
        &I'(p) = intlimits_0^inftydfrac{ze^{-z^2}}{p^2z^2+1},mathrm dz
        = dfrac12 p^{-2}intlimits_0^inftydfrac{e^{-z^2}}{z^2+p^{-2}},mathrm dz^2.\[4pt]
        end{align}$$

        Using known definite integral
        $$int_0^inftydfrac{e^{-ay}}{b+y},mathrm dy=e^{ab}mathrm {E}_1(ab),$$
        one can get
        $$I'(p)=dfrac12 p^{-2}e^{p^{-2}}mathrm {E}_1(-p^2),$$
        $$I(p) = dfrac12 intlimits_0^p p^{-2}e^{p^{-2}}mathrm {E}_1(-p^2) dp
        = left|p=frac1t,, t=frac1p,,mathrm dt=-frac{mathrm dp}{p^2}right|
        = dfrac12intlimits_{p^{-1}}^infty e^{t^2}mathrm {E}_1(t^2), dt,$$

        $$boxed{I(1) = dfrac12intlimits_{1}^infty e^{t^2}mathrm {E}_1(t^2), dt}.$$
        Numeric calculations give the same result $I(1)approx0.40978$ for the both expressions, but this result can not presented via elementary functions.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 4 at 20:52

























        answered Jan 2 at 22:04









        Yuri NegometyanovYuri Negometyanov

        11k1728




        11k1728






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054635%2fcontour-for-int-0-infty-arctanz-e-z2-dz-or-some-variant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            An IMO inspired problem

            Management

            Investment