Word for when we accidentally invert the syllabic utterances of words?












15














Today, during a conversation, one of my friends accidentally inverted the syllables of the word "bookmarks" as "markbooks." Then I immediately thought about describing such a mistake in speaking.



I asked my elder brother, who suggested I regard it as stuttering. But sadly, this word doesn't fit well for what I am asking over here, since stuttering denotes the repetition of sounds pertaining to just initial consonants:




verb
1. talk with continued involuntary repetition of sounds, especially initial consonants.




See the following image about stuttering:



Stuttering



In the image above, there's talk of the word "soda", which is written as s-s-s-s-soda to express stuttering.



There might be a word describing the inversion of syllabic utterance of words.




"He said 'markbooks' rather than saying 'bookmarks' because of _____ [in place of the word 'stuttering']"




The word I am asking for here can be a verb (an act of doing what I described here), or noun or noun-phrase to describe such an accidental act.





My question is different from "Is there a term for switching syllables of words?". In that post, the OP's primary question is about the exchange of two different syllables belonging to two different words; as his first example tells "trace" and "race", which are different and both having their own distinct syllables. Whereas my question is about the exchange of syllables within the same word and without dropping any letter(s) of words e.g.:




bookmarks > markbooks



clockwise > wiseclock



Textbook > booktext











share|improve this question




















  • 4




    Related (but French): Verlan.
    – Glorfindel
    2 days ago










  • @Glorfindel, the Wikipedia states differently about what I am asking here. As the website says "verlan often drops the final vowel sound after the word is inverted, so femme and flic become meuf and keuf, respectively." // but here my question is not about dropping of any consonants or vowels.
    – Ahmed
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Is there a term for switching syllables of words?
    – BruceWayne
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Ahmed I see that you amended your question with clarification about what kind of switch you're asking. There's no special word to distinguish your very specific situation from the other very specific situations. Hyperbaton is for word order swaps, spoonerism is for initial sounds of words, metathesis is for any kind of otherwise unspecified swap (but usually for phonemes).
    – Mitch
    2 days ago










  • Inverted order; it seems more natural to some deaf people in certain cases (it's natural, not French). Sometimes hearing people do it too.
    – KannE
    yesterday


















15














Today, during a conversation, one of my friends accidentally inverted the syllables of the word "bookmarks" as "markbooks." Then I immediately thought about describing such a mistake in speaking.



I asked my elder brother, who suggested I regard it as stuttering. But sadly, this word doesn't fit well for what I am asking over here, since stuttering denotes the repetition of sounds pertaining to just initial consonants:




verb
1. talk with continued involuntary repetition of sounds, especially initial consonants.




See the following image about stuttering:



Stuttering



In the image above, there's talk of the word "soda", which is written as s-s-s-s-soda to express stuttering.



There might be a word describing the inversion of syllabic utterance of words.




"He said 'markbooks' rather than saying 'bookmarks' because of _____ [in place of the word 'stuttering']"




The word I am asking for here can be a verb (an act of doing what I described here), or noun or noun-phrase to describe such an accidental act.





My question is different from "Is there a term for switching syllables of words?". In that post, the OP's primary question is about the exchange of two different syllables belonging to two different words; as his first example tells "trace" and "race", which are different and both having their own distinct syllables. Whereas my question is about the exchange of syllables within the same word and without dropping any letter(s) of words e.g.:




bookmarks > markbooks



clockwise > wiseclock



Textbook > booktext











share|improve this question




















  • 4




    Related (but French): Verlan.
    – Glorfindel
    2 days ago










  • @Glorfindel, the Wikipedia states differently about what I am asking here. As the website says "verlan often drops the final vowel sound after the word is inverted, so femme and flic become meuf and keuf, respectively." // but here my question is not about dropping of any consonants or vowels.
    – Ahmed
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Is there a term for switching syllables of words?
    – BruceWayne
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Ahmed I see that you amended your question with clarification about what kind of switch you're asking. There's no special word to distinguish your very specific situation from the other very specific situations. Hyperbaton is for word order swaps, spoonerism is for initial sounds of words, metathesis is for any kind of otherwise unspecified swap (but usually for phonemes).
    – Mitch
    2 days ago










  • Inverted order; it seems more natural to some deaf people in certain cases (it's natural, not French). Sometimes hearing people do it too.
    – KannE
    yesterday
















15












15








15


4





Today, during a conversation, one of my friends accidentally inverted the syllables of the word "bookmarks" as "markbooks." Then I immediately thought about describing such a mistake in speaking.



I asked my elder brother, who suggested I regard it as stuttering. But sadly, this word doesn't fit well for what I am asking over here, since stuttering denotes the repetition of sounds pertaining to just initial consonants:




verb
1. talk with continued involuntary repetition of sounds, especially initial consonants.




See the following image about stuttering:



Stuttering



In the image above, there's talk of the word "soda", which is written as s-s-s-s-soda to express stuttering.



There might be a word describing the inversion of syllabic utterance of words.




"He said 'markbooks' rather than saying 'bookmarks' because of _____ [in place of the word 'stuttering']"




The word I am asking for here can be a verb (an act of doing what I described here), or noun or noun-phrase to describe such an accidental act.





My question is different from "Is there a term for switching syllables of words?". In that post, the OP's primary question is about the exchange of two different syllables belonging to two different words; as his first example tells "trace" and "race", which are different and both having their own distinct syllables. Whereas my question is about the exchange of syllables within the same word and without dropping any letter(s) of words e.g.:




bookmarks > markbooks



clockwise > wiseclock



Textbook > booktext











share|improve this question















Today, during a conversation, one of my friends accidentally inverted the syllables of the word "bookmarks" as "markbooks." Then I immediately thought about describing such a mistake in speaking.



I asked my elder brother, who suggested I regard it as stuttering. But sadly, this word doesn't fit well for what I am asking over here, since stuttering denotes the repetition of sounds pertaining to just initial consonants:




verb
1. talk with continued involuntary repetition of sounds, especially initial consonants.




See the following image about stuttering:



Stuttering



In the image above, there's talk of the word "soda", which is written as s-s-s-s-soda to express stuttering.



There might be a word describing the inversion of syllabic utterance of words.




"He said 'markbooks' rather than saying 'bookmarks' because of _____ [in place of the word 'stuttering']"




The word I am asking for here can be a verb (an act of doing what I described here), or noun or noun-phrase to describe such an accidental act.





My question is different from "Is there a term for switching syllables of words?". In that post, the OP's primary question is about the exchange of two different syllables belonging to two different words; as his first example tells "trace" and "race", which are different and both having their own distinct syllables. Whereas my question is about the exchange of syllables within the same word and without dropping any letter(s) of words e.g.:




bookmarks > markbooks



clockwise > wiseclock



Textbook > booktext








single-word-requests phrase-requests verbs






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









psmears

13k14558




13k14558










asked 2 days ago









AhmedAhmed

3,63311952




3,63311952








  • 4




    Related (but French): Verlan.
    – Glorfindel
    2 days ago










  • @Glorfindel, the Wikipedia states differently about what I am asking here. As the website says "verlan often drops the final vowel sound after the word is inverted, so femme and flic become meuf and keuf, respectively." // but here my question is not about dropping of any consonants or vowels.
    – Ahmed
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Is there a term for switching syllables of words?
    – BruceWayne
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Ahmed I see that you amended your question with clarification about what kind of switch you're asking. There's no special word to distinguish your very specific situation from the other very specific situations. Hyperbaton is for word order swaps, spoonerism is for initial sounds of words, metathesis is for any kind of otherwise unspecified swap (but usually for phonemes).
    – Mitch
    2 days ago










  • Inverted order; it seems more natural to some deaf people in certain cases (it's natural, not French). Sometimes hearing people do it too.
    – KannE
    yesterday
















  • 4




    Related (but French): Verlan.
    – Glorfindel
    2 days ago










  • @Glorfindel, the Wikipedia states differently about what I am asking here. As the website says "verlan often drops the final vowel sound after the word is inverted, so femme and flic become meuf and keuf, respectively." // but here my question is not about dropping of any consonants or vowels.
    – Ahmed
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Is there a term for switching syllables of words?
    – BruceWayne
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Ahmed I see that you amended your question with clarification about what kind of switch you're asking. There's no special word to distinguish your very specific situation from the other very specific situations. Hyperbaton is for word order swaps, spoonerism is for initial sounds of words, metathesis is for any kind of otherwise unspecified swap (but usually for phonemes).
    – Mitch
    2 days ago










  • Inverted order; it seems more natural to some deaf people in certain cases (it's natural, not French). Sometimes hearing people do it too.
    – KannE
    yesterday










4




4




Related (but French): Verlan.
– Glorfindel
2 days ago




Related (but French): Verlan.
– Glorfindel
2 days ago












@Glorfindel, the Wikipedia states differently about what I am asking here. As the website says "verlan often drops the final vowel sound after the word is inverted, so femme and flic become meuf and keuf, respectively." // but here my question is not about dropping of any consonants or vowels.
– Ahmed
2 days ago




@Glorfindel, the Wikipedia states differently about what I am asking here. As the website says "verlan often drops the final vowel sound after the word is inverted, so femme and flic become meuf and keuf, respectively." // but here my question is not about dropping of any consonants or vowels.
– Ahmed
2 days ago




1




1




Possible duplicate of Is there a term for switching syllables of words?
– BruceWayne
2 days ago




Possible duplicate of Is there a term for switching syllables of words?
– BruceWayne
2 days ago




1




1




@Ahmed I see that you amended your question with clarification about what kind of switch you're asking. There's no special word to distinguish your very specific situation from the other very specific situations. Hyperbaton is for word order swaps, spoonerism is for initial sounds of words, metathesis is for any kind of otherwise unspecified swap (but usually for phonemes).
– Mitch
2 days ago




@Ahmed I see that you amended your question with clarification about what kind of switch you're asking. There's no special word to distinguish your very specific situation from the other very specific situations. Hyperbaton is for word order swaps, spoonerism is for initial sounds of words, metathesis is for any kind of otherwise unspecified swap (but usually for phonemes).
– Mitch
2 days ago












Inverted order; it seems more natural to some deaf people in certain cases (it's natural, not French). Sometimes hearing people do it too.
– KannE
yesterday






Inverted order; it seems more natural to some deaf people in certain cases (it's natural, not French). Sometimes hearing people do it too.
– KannE
yesterday












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















34














Any kind of switch in order, whether sounds, syllables, or words, is called:




metathesis




(/mɪˈtæθɪsɪs/ with accent on the second syllable).



Examples are:




  • common pronunciation of 'comfortable' as 'comfterble' /ˈkʌmftərbəl/

  • 'peckerwood' for 'woodpecker'


A spoonerism is a kind of metathesis. For example, "A well-boiled icicle" ("well-oiled bicycle").



In rhetoric, changing out of the usual word order is also called




hyperbaton




(having numerous rhetorical synonyms like anastrophe or synchysis).



Of course 'metathesis' (not to be confused with 'metastasis' a spread of cancer to a secondary site), is a bit technical sounding. A more natural sounding alternative might simply be




switch




or




transposition




or as you mentioned




inversion.




These are all mostly intentional (except for a Spoonerism). If what is happening is an actual mistake, then it might additionally be called euphemistically a




solecism.







share|improve this answer



















  • 11




    I don't know if it matters, but a 'peckerwood' and a 'woodpecker' are not the same thing.
    – Robusto
    2 days ago










  • @Robusto yes, though etymonline euphemistically considers them synonymous.
    – Mitch
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Reminds me of the comedian shtick of Rindercella and her gairy fodmother.
    – hatchet
    yesterday



















13














The most common term I've heard for this is a "Spoonerism". It's a reference to William Archibald Spooner who was known for making these kinds of utterances unintentionally.






share|improve this answer

















  • 9




    The definition of a Spoonerism isn't ironclad, but I've typically seen it as transposing only the initial sounds of words, rather than swapping the order of compound words. A Spoonerism of "bookmark" would be "mookbark", not "markbook".
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday






  • 1




    @NuclearWang - Sorry, but no. One of Spooner's best-known malaprops is, "Pardon me, Sir, but I think you are occupewing my pie."
    – WhatRoughBeast
    yesterday










  • Spooner may or may not have spoken that way intentionally but most Spoonerisms I have heard and most of those I spoken myself have been deliberate.
    – BoldBen
    yesterday






  • 1




    @WhatRoughBeast I'd argue that most Spoonerisms are made by transposing the initial sounds of two words, but you are correct that it's not the only way to make one. I'd still be hard-pressed to call "markbook" a Spoonerism, though, as it effectively reorders entire words, rather than rearranging phonemes to make new words.
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday



















1














There used to be a common expression, "backasswards" - a metathesis of ass-backwards - that could be used to describe this situation:



"You said that word backasswards, you know."



It also has other useful applications, although you don't hear it as much anymore. US.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Do you have any sources for this expression?
    – tox123
    yesterday






  • 2




    I've always heard it as "bass-ackwards".
    – SliceThePi
    yesterday










  • @SliceThePi : me, too, but it usually just means 'completely wrong'. Like if someone claims why something has occurred and attributes cause incorrectly. (especially when they're assigning blame to the incorrect party)
    – Joe
    yesterday






  • 1




    Much as I like this idea of backassward (and I very much do), Merriam-Webster defines backassward as utterly or ridiculously backward, foolish, or wrong or as equivalent to ass-backward.
    – tmgr
    yesterday













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480348%2fword-for-when-we-accidentally-invert-the-syllabic-utterances-of-words%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









34














Any kind of switch in order, whether sounds, syllables, or words, is called:




metathesis




(/mɪˈtæθɪsɪs/ with accent on the second syllable).



Examples are:




  • common pronunciation of 'comfortable' as 'comfterble' /ˈkʌmftərbəl/

  • 'peckerwood' for 'woodpecker'


A spoonerism is a kind of metathesis. For example, "A well-boiled icicle" ("well-oiled bicycle").



In rhetoric, changing out of the usual word order is also called




hyperbaton




(having numerous rhetorical synonyms like anastrophe or synchysis).



Of course 'metathesis' (not to be confused with 'metastasis' a spread of cancer to a secondary site), is a bit technical sounding. A more natural sounding alternative might simply be




switch




or




transposition




or as you mentioned




inversion.




These are all mostly intentional (except for a Spoonerism). If what is happening is an actual mistake, then it might additionally be called euphemistically a




solecism.







share|improve this answer



















  • 11




    I don't know if it matters, but a 'peckerwood' and a 'woodpecker' are not the same thing.
    – Robusto
    2 days ago










  • @Robusto yes, though etymonline euphemistically considers them synonymous.
    – Mitch
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Reminds me of the comedian shtick of Rindercella and her gairy fodmother.
    – hatchet
    yesterday
















34














Any kind of switch in order, whether sounds, syllables, or words, is called:




metathesis




(/mɪˈtæθɪsɪs/ with accent on the second syllable).



Examples are:




  • common pronunciation of 'comfortable' as 'comfterble' /ˈkʌmftərbəl/

  • 'peckerwood' for 'woodpecker'


A spoonerism is a kind of metathesis. For example, "A well-boiled icicle" ("well-oiled bicycle").



In rhetoric, changing out of the usual word order is also called




hyperbaton




(having numerous rhetorical synonyms like anastrophe or synchysis).



Of course 'metathesis' (not to be confused with 'metastasis' a spread of cancer to a secondary site), is a bit technical sounding. A more natural sounding alternative might simply be




switch




or




transposition




or as you mentioned




inversion.




These are all mostly intentional (except for a Spoonerism). If what is happening is an actual mistake, then it might additionally be called euphemistically a




solecism.







share|improve this answer



















  • 11




    I don't know if it matters, but a 'peckerwood' and a 'woodpecker' are not the same thing.
    – Robusto
    2 days ago










  • @Robusto yes, though etymonline euphemistically considers them synonymous.
    – Mitch
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Reminds me of the comedian shtick of Rindercella and her gairy fodmother.
    – hatchet
    yesterday














34












34








34






Any kind of switch in order, whether sounds, syllables, or words, is called:




metathesis




(/mɪˈtæθɪsɪs/ with accent on the second syllable).



Examples are:




  • common pronunciation of 'comfortable' as 'comfterble' /ˈkʌmftərbəl/

  • 'peckerwood' for 'woodpecker'


A spoonerism is a kind of metathesis. For example, "A well-boiled icicle" ("well-oiled bicycle").



In rhetoric, changing out of the usual word order is also called




hyperbaton




(having numerous rhetorical synonyms like anastrophe or synchysis).



Of course 'metathesis' (not to be confused with 'metastasis' a spread of cancer to a secondary site), is a bit technical sounding. A more natural sounding alternative might simply be




switch




or




transposition




or as you mentioned




inversion.




These are all mostly intentional (except for a Spoonerism). If what is happening is an actual mistake, then it might additionally be called euphemistically a




solecism.







share|improve this answer














Any kind of switch in order, whether sounds, syllables, or words, is called:




metathesis




(/mɪˈtæθɪsɪs/ with accent on the second syllable).



Examples are:




  • common pronunciation of 'comfortable' as 'comfterble' /ˈkʌmftərbəl/

  • 'peckerwood' for 'woodpecker'


A spoonerism is a kind of metathesis. For example, "A well-boiled icicle" ("well-oiled bicycle").



In rhetoric, changing out of the usual word order is also called




hyperbaton




(having numerous rhetorical synonyms like anastrophe or synchysis).



Of course 'metathesis' (not to be confused with 'metastasis' a spread of cancer to a secondary site), is a bit technical sounding. A more natural sounding alternative might simply be




switch




or




transposition




or as you mentioned




inversion.




These are all mostly intentional (except for a Spoonerism). If what is happening is an actual mistake, then it might additionally be called euphemistically a




solecism.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago









user662852

2,596619




2,596619










answered 2 days ago









MitchMitch

50.7k15103212




50.7k15103212








  • 11




    I don't know if it matters, but a 'peckerwood' and a 'woodpecker' are not the same thing.
    – Robusto
    2 days ago










  • @Robusto yes, though etymonline euphemistically considers them synonymous.
    – Mitch
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Reminds me of the comedian shtick of Rindercella and her gairy fodmother.
    – hatchet
    yesterday














  • 11




    I don't know if it matters, but a 'peckerwood' and a 'woodpecker' are not the same thing.
    – Robusto
    2 days ago










  • @Robusto yes, though etymonline euphemistically considers them synonymous.
    – Mitch
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Reminds me of the comedian shtick of Rindercella and her gairy fodmother.
    – hatchet
    yesterday








11




11




I don't know if it matters, but a 'peckerwood' and a 'woodpecker' are not the same thing.
– Robusto
2 days ago




I don't know if it matters, but a 'peckerwood' and a 'woodpecker' are not the same thing.
– Robusto
2 days ago












@Robusto yes, though etymonline euphemistically considers them synonymous.
– Mitch
2 days ago




@Robusto yes, though etymonline euphemistically considers them synonymous.
– Mitch
2 days ago




2




2




Reminds me of the comedian shtick of Rindercella and her gairy fodmother.
– hatchet
yesterday




Reminds me of the comedian shtick of Rindercella and her gairy fodmother.
– hatchet
yesterday













13














The most common term I've heard for this is a "Spoonerism". It's a reference to William Archibald Spooner who was known for making these kinds of utterances unintentionally.






share|improve this answer

















  • 9




    The definition of a Spoonerism isn't ironclad, but I've typically seen it as transposing only the initial sounds of words, rather than swapping the order of compound words. A Spoonerism of "bookmark" would be "mookbark", not "markbook".
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday






  • 1




    @NuclearWang - Sorry, but no. One of Spooner's best-known malaprops is, "Pardon me, Sir, but I think you are occupewing my pie."
    – WhatRoughBeast
    yesterday










  • Spooner may or may not have spoken that way intentionally but most Spoonerisms I have heard and most of those I spoken myself have been deliberate.
    – BoldBen
    yesterday






  • 1




    @WhatRoughBeast I'd argue that most Spoonerisms are made by transposing the initial sounds of two words, but you are correct that it's not the only way to make one. I'd still be hard-pressed to call "markbook" a Spoonerism, though, as it effectively reorders entire words, rather than rearranging phonemes to make new words.
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday
















13














The most common term I've heard for this is a "Spoonerism". It's a reference to William Archibald Spooner who was known for making these kinds of utterances unintentionally.






share|improve this answer

















  • 9




    The definition of a Spoonerism isn't ironclad, but I've typically seen it as transposing only the initial sounds of words, rather than swapping the order of compound words. A Spoonerism of "bookmark" would be "mookbark", not "markbook".
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday






  • 1




    @NuclearWang - Sorry, but no. One of Spooner's best-known malaprops is, "Pardon me, Sir, but I think you are occupewing my pie."
    – WhatRoughBeast
    yesterday










  • Spooner may or may not have spoken that way intentionally but most Spoonerisms I have heard and most of those I spoken myself have been deliberate.
    – BoldBen
    yesterday






  • 1




    @WhatRoughBeast I'd argue that most Spoonerisms are made by transposing the initial sounds of two words, but you are correct that it's not the only way to make one. I'd still be hard-pressed to call "markbook" a Spoonerism, though, as it effectively reorders entire words, rather than rearranging phonemes to make new words.
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday














13












13








13






The most common term I've heard for this is a "Spoonerism". It's a reference to William Archibald Spooner who was known for making these kinds of utterances unintentionally.






share|improve this answer












The most common term I've heard for this is a "Spoonerism". It's a reference to William Archibald Spooner who was known for making these kinds of utterances unintentionally.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









CodeMonkeyCodeMonkey

4014




4014








  • 9




    The definition of a Spoonerism isn't ironclad, but I've typically seen it as transposing only the initial sounds of words, rather than swapping the order of compound words. A Spoonerism of "bookmark" would be "mookbark", not "markbook".
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday






  • 1




    @NuclearWang - Sorry, but no. One of Spooner's best-known malaprops is, "Pardon me, Sir, but I think you are occupewing my pie."
    – WhatRoughBeast
    yesterday










  • Spooner may or may not have spoken that way intentionally but most Spoonerisms I have heard and most of those I spoken myself have been deliberate.
    – BoldBen
    yesterday






  • 1




    @WhatRoughBeast I'd argue that most Spoonerisms are made by transposing the initial sounds of two words, but you are correct that it's not the only way to make one. I'd still be hard-pressed to call "markbook" a Spoonerism, though, as it effectively reorders entire words, rather than rearranging phonemes to make new words.
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday














  • 9




    The definition of a Spoonerism isn't ironclad, but I've typically seen it as transposing only the initial sounds of words, rather than swapping the order of compound words. A Spoonerism of "bookmark" would be "mookbark", not "markbook".
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday






  • 1




    @NuclearWang - Sorry, but no. One of Spooner's best-known malaprops is, "Pardon me, Sir, but I think you are occupewing my pie."
    – WhatRoughBeast
    yesterday










  • Spooner may or may not have spoken that way intentionally but most Spoonerisms I have heard and most of those I spoken myself have been deliberate.
    – BoldBen
    yesterday






  • 1




    @WhatRoughBeast I'd argue that most Spoonerisms are made by transposing the initial sounds of two words, but you are correct that it's not the only way to make one. I'd still be hard-pressed to call "markbook" a Spoonerism, though, as it effectively reorders entire words, rather than rearranging phonemes to make new words.
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday








9




9




The definition of a Spoonerism isn't ironclad, but I've typically seen it as transposing only the initial sounds of words, rather than swapping the order of compound words. A Spoonerism of "bookmark" would be "mookbark", not "markbook".
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday




The definition of a Spoonerism isn't ironclad, but I've typically seen it as transposing only the initial sounds of words, rather than swapping the order of compound words. A Spoonerism of "bookmark" would be "mookbark", not "markbook".
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday




1




1




@NuclearWang - Sorry, but no. One of Spooner's best-known malaprops is, "Pardon me, Sir, but I think you are occupewing my pie."
– WhatRoughBeast
yesterday




@NuclearWang - Sorry, but no. One of Spooner's best-known malaprops is, "Pardon me, Sir, but I think you are occupewing my pie."
– WhatRoughBeast
yesterday












Spooner may or may not have spoken that way intentionally but most Spoonerisms I have heard and most of those I spoken myself have been deliberate.
– BoldBen
yesterday




Spooner may or may not have spoken that way intentionally but most Spoonerisms I have heard and most of those I spoken myself have been deliberate.
– BoldBen
yesterday




1




1




@WhatRoughBeast I'd argue that most Spoonerisms are made by transposing the initial sounds of two words, but you are correct that it's not the only way to make one. I'd still be hard-pressed to call "markbook" a Spoonerism, though, as it effectively reorders entire words, rather than rearranging phonemes to make new words.
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday




@WhatRoughBeast I'd argue that most Spoonerisms are made by transposing the initial sounds of two words, but you are correct that it's not the only way to make one. I'd still be hard-pressed to call "markbook" a Spoonerism, though, as it effectively reorders entire words, rather than rearranging phonemes to make new words.
– Nuclear Wang
yesterday











1














There used to be a common expression, "backasswards" - a metathesis of ass-backwards - that could be used to describe this situation:



"You said that word backasswards, you know."



It also has other useful applications, although you don't hear it as much anymore. US.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Do you have any sources for this expression?
    – tox123
    yesterday






  • 2




    I've always heard it as "bass-ackwards".
    – SliceThePi
    yesterday










  • @SliceThePi : me, too, but it usually just means 'completely wrong'. Like if someone claims why something has occurred and attributes cause incorrectly. (especially when they're assigning blame to the incorrect party)
    – Joe
    yesterday






  • 1




    Much as I like this idea of backassward (and I very much do), Merriam-Webster defines backassward as utterly or ridiculously backward, foolish, or wrong or as equivalent to ass-backward.
    – tmgr
    yesterday


















1














There used to be a common expression, "backasswards" - a metathesis of ass-backwards - that could be used to describe this situation:



"You said that word backasswards, you know."



It also has other useful applications, although you don't hear it as much anymore. US.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Do you have any sources for this expression?
    – tox123
    yesterday






  • 2




    I've always heard it as "bass-ackwards".
    – SliceThePi
    yesterday










  • @SliceThePi : me, too, but it usually just means 'completely wrong'. Like if someone claims why something has occurred and attributes cause incorrectly. (especially when they're assigning blame to the incorrect party)
    – Joe
    yesterday






  • 1




    Much as I like this idea of backassward (and I very much do), Merriam-Webster defines backassward as utterly or ridiculously backward, foolish, or wrong or as equivalent to ass-backward.
    – tmgr
    yesterday
















1












1








1






There used to be a common expression, "backasswards" - a metathesis of ass-backwards - that could be used to describe this situation:



"You said that word backasswards, you know."



It also has other useful applications, although you don't hear it as much anymore. US.






share|improve this answer












There used to be a common expression, "backasswards" - a metathesis of ass-backwards - that could be used to describe this situation:



"You said that word backasswards, you know."



It also has other useful applications, although you don't hear it as much anymore. US.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









OldbagOldbag

12.1k1437




12.1k1437








  • 1




    Do you have any sources for this expression?
    – tox123
    yesterday






  • 2




    I've always heard it as "bass-ackwards".
    – SliceThePi
    yesterday










  • @SliceThePi : me, too, but it usually just means 'completely wrong'. Like if someone claims why something has occurred and attributes cause incorrectly. (especially when they're assigning blame to the incorrect party)
    – Joe
    yesterday






  • 1




    Much as I like this idea of backassward (and I very much do), Merriam-Webster defines backassward as utterly or ridiculously backward, foolish, or wrong or as equivalent to ass-backward.
    – tmgr
    yesterday
















  • 1




    Do you have any sources for this expression?
    – tox123
    yesterday






  • 2




    I've always heard it as "bass-ackwards".
    – SliceThePi
    yesterday










  • @SliceThePi : me, too, but it usually just means 'completely wrong'. Like if someone claims why something has occurred and attributes cause incorrectly. (especially when they're assigning blame to the incorrect party)
    – Joe
    yesterday






  • 1




    Much as I like this idea of backassward (and I very much do), Merriam-Webster defines backassward as utterly or ridiculously backward, foolish, or wrong or as equivalent to ass-backward.
    – tmgr
    yesterday










1




1




Do you have any sources for this expression?
– tox123
yesterday




Do you have any sources for this expression?
– tox123
yesterday




2




2




I've always heard it as "bass-ackwards".
– SliceThePi
yesterday




I've always heard it as "bass-ackwards".
– SliceThePi
yesterday












@SliceThePi : me, too, but it usually just means 'completely wrong'. Like if someone claims why something has occurred and attributes cause incorrectly. (especially when they're assigning blame to the incorrect party)
– Joe
yesterday




@SliceThePi : me, too, but it usually just means 'completely wrong'. Like if someone claims why something has occurred and attributes cause incorrectly. (especially when they're assigning blame to the incorrect party)
– Joe
yesterday




1




1




Much as I like this idea of backassward (and I very much do), Merriam-Webster defines backassward as utterly or ridiculously backward, foolish, or wrong or as equivalent to ass-backward.
– tmgr
yesterday






Much as I like this idea of backassward (and I very much do), Merriam-Webster defines backassward as utterly or ridiculously backward, foolish, or wrong or as equivalent to ass-backward.
– tmgr
yesterday




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480348%2fword-for-when-we-accidentally-invert-the-syllabic-utterances-of-words%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

An IMO inspired problem

Management

Investment