How does a router know the MTU of a network?
I've done several exercises where you're given the MTU of a net or subnet, but I wonder how routers know the MTU of the nets they're connected. I've learnt that in OSPF protocol this information is excanged among routers. However, is there another way of finding that information for a router that doesn't use OSPF?
I hope someone can help me. Thank you for your responses.
routing router layer1 interface mtu
add a comment |
I've done several exercises where you're given the MTU of a net or subnet, but I wonder how routers know the MTU of the nets they're connected. I've learnt that in OSPF protocol this information is excanged among routers. However, is there another way of finding that information for a router that doesn't use OSPF?
I hope someone can help me. Thank you for your responses.
routing router layer1 interface mtu
add a comment |
I've done several exercises where you're given the MTU of a net or subnet, but I wonder how routers know the MTU of the nets they're connected. I've learnt that in OSPF protocol this information is excanged among routers. However, is there another way of finding that information for a router that doesn't use OSPF?
I hope someone can help me. Thank you for your responses.
routing router layer1 interface mtu
I've done several exercises where you're given the MTU of a net or subnet, but I wonder how routers know the MTU of the nets they're connected. I've learnt that in OSPF protocol this information is excanged among routers. However, is there another way of finding that information for a router that doesn't use OSPF?
I hope someone can help me. Thank you for your responses.
routing router layer1 interface mtu
routing router layer1 interface mtu
edited yesterday
Ron Maupin♦
62.9k1365120
62.9k1365120
asked yesterday
Josemi Josemi
402
402
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The MTU of an interface is a function of the layer-2 protocol for that interface, and a device, including a router, will inherently know the MTU of the interface based on the protocol for the interface. For example the MTU for ethernet is 1500.
Some routers can configure the interface MTU with a configuration command. Also virtual interfaces, e.g. a tunnel, will calculate the MTU based on the MTU of the physical interface that is the source of the tunnel, minus the tunnel protocol overhead.
For Cisco routers, you can use the show interfaces
command to see the MTU for one or more interfaces. Other vendors will have similar commands.
add a comment |
Routers know because they have physical interfaces connected to the networks. Those interfaces are configured for the correct MTU.
You are mistaken about OSPF: The protocol does not exchange MTU information.
I think the OSPF confusion is that the MTU must match for OSPF to form a neighbor.
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
I don't think so, if you consult the rfc of OSPF, version 2: rfc-editor.org/pdfrfc/rfc2328.txt.pdf , in page 195 where the information database packet is described, there is a field ofinterface MTU
.
– Josemi
yesterday
@Josemi, from Why Are OSPF Neighbors Stuck in Exstart/Exchange State?: "OSPF states for adjacency formation are Down, Init, Attempt, 2-way, Exstart, Exchange, Loading and Full. There can be number of reasons why the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) neighbors are stuck in exstart/exchange state. This document focuses on an MTU mismatch between OSPF neighbors resulting in exstart/exchange state. For more details on troubleshooting OSPF refer to Troubleshooting OSPF."
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "496"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f55931%2fhow-does-a-router-know-the-mtu-of-a-network%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The MTU of an interface is a function of the layer-2 protocol for that interface, and a device, including a router, will inherently know the MTU of the interface based on the protocol for the interface. For example the MTU for ethernet is 1500.
Some routers can configure the interface MTU with a configuration command. Also virtual interfaces, e.g. a tunnel, will calculate the MTU based on the MTU of the physical interface that is the source of the tunnel, minus the tunnel protocol overhead.
For Cisco routers, you can use the show interfaces
command to see the MTU for one or more interfaces. Other vendors will have similar commands.
add a comment |
The MTU of an interface is a function of the layer-2 protocol for that interface, and a device, including a router, will inherently know the MTU of the interface based on the protocol for the interface. For example the MTU for ethernet is 1500.
Some routers can configure the interface MTU with a configuration command. Also virtual interfaces, e.g. a tunnel, will calculate the MTU based on the MTU of the physical interface that is the source of the tunnel, minus the tunnel protocol overhead.
For Cisco routers, you can use the show interfaces
command to see the MTU for one or more interfaces. Other vendors will have similar commands.
add a comment |
The MTU of an interface is a function of the layer-2 protocol for that interface, and a device, including a router, will inherently know the MTU of the interface based on the protocol for the interface. For example the MTU for ethernet is 1500.
Some routers can configure the interface MTU with a configuration command. Also virtual interfaces, e.g. a tunnel, will calculate the MTU based on the MTU of the physical interface that is the source of the tunnel, minus the tunnel protocol overhead.
For Cisco routers, you can use the show interfaces
command to see the MTU for one or more interfaces. Other vendors will have similar commands.
The MTU of an interface is a function of the layer-2 protocol for that interface, and a device, including a router, will inherently know the MTU of the interface based on the protocol for the interface. For example the MTU for ethernet is 1500.
Some routers can configure the interface MTU with a configuration command. Also virtual interfaces, e.g. a tunnel, will calculate the MTU based on the MTU of the physical interface that is the source of the tunnel, minus the tunnel protocol overhead.
For Cisco routers, you can use the show interfaces
command to see the MTU for one or more interfaces. Other vendors will have similar commands.
answered yesterday
Ron Maupin♦Ron Maupin
62.9k1365120
62.9k1365120
add a comment |
add a comment |
Routers know because they have physical interfaces connected to the networks. Those interfaces are configured for the correct MTU.
You are mistaken about OSPF: The protocol does not exchange MTU information.
I think the OSPF confusion is that the MTU must match for OSPF to form a neighbor.
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
I don't think so, if you consult the rfc of OSPF, version 2: rfc-editor.org/pdfrfc/rfc2328.txt.pdf , in page 195 where the information database packet is described, there is a field ofinterface MTU
.
– Josemi
yesterday
@Josemi, from Why Are OSPF Neighbors Stuck in Exstart/Exchange State?: "OSPF states for adjacency formation are Down, Init, Attempt, 2-way, Exstart, Exchange, Loading and Full. There can be number of reasons why the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) neighbors are stuck in exstart/exchange state. This document focuses on an MTU mismatch between OSPF neighbors resulting in exstart/exchange state. For more details on troubleshooting OSPF refer to Troubleshooting OSPF."
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
add a comment |
Routers know because they have physical interfaces connected to the networks. Those interfaces are configured for the correct MTU.
You are mistaken about OSPF: The protocol does not exchange MTU information.
I think the OSPF confusion is that the MTU must match for OSPF to form a neighbor.
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
I don't think so, if you consult the rfc of OSPF, version 2: rfc-editor.org/pdfrfc/rfc2328.txt.pdf , in page 195 where the information database packet is described, there is a field ofinterface MTU
.
– Josemi
yesterday
@Josemi, from Why Are OSPF Neighbors Stuck in Exstart/Exchange State?: "OSPF states for adjacency formation are Down, Init, Attempt, 2-way, Exstart, Exchange, Loading and Full. There can be number of reasons why the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) neighbors are stuck in exstart/exchange state. This document focuses on an MTU mismatch between OSPF neighbors resulting in exstart/exchange state. For more details on troubleshooting OSPF refer to Troubleshooting OSPF."
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
add a comment |
Routers know because they have physical interfaces connected to the networks. Those interfaces are configured for the correct MTU.
You are mistaken about OSPF: The protocol does not exchange MTU information.
Routers know because they have physical interfaces connected to the networks. Those interfaces are configured for the correct MTU.
You are mistaken about OSPF: The protocol does not exchange MTU information.
answered yesterday
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
35k33372
35k33372
I think the OSPF confusion is that the MTU must match for OSPF to form a neighbor.
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
I don't think so, if you consult the rfc of OSPF, version 2: rfc-editor.org/pdfrfc/rfc2328.txt.pdf , in page 195 where the information database packet is described, there is a field ofinterface MTU
.
– Josemi
yesterday
@Josemi, from Why Are OSPF Neighbors Stuck in Exstart/Exchange State?: "OSPF states for adjacency formation are Down, Init, Attempt, 2-way, Exstart, Exchange, Loading and Full. There can be number of reasons why the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) neighbors are stuck in exstart/exchange state. This document focuses on an MTU mismatch between OSPF neighbors resulting in exstart/exchange state. For more details on troubleshooting OSPF refer to Troubleshooting OSPF."
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
add a comment |
I think the OSPF confusion is that the MTU must match for OSPF to form a neighbor.
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
I don't think so, if you consult the rfc of OSPF, version 2: rfc-editor.org/pdfrfc/rfc2328.txt.pdf , in page 195 where the information database packet is described, there is a field ofinterface MTU
.
– Josemi
yesterday
@Josemi, from Why Are OSPF Neighbors Stuck in Exstart/Exchange State?: "OSPF states for adjacency formation are Down, Init, Attempt, 2-way, Exstart, Exchange, Loading and Full. There can be number of reasons why the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) neighbors are stuck in exstart/exchange state. This document focuses on an MTU mismatch between OSPF neighbors resulting in exstart/exchange state. For more details on troubleshooting OSPF refer to Troubleshooting OSPF."
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
I think the OSPF confusion is that the MTU must match for OSPF to form a neighbor.
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
I think the OSPF confusion is that the MTU must match for OSPF to form a neighbor.
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
I don't think so, if you consult the rfc of OSPF, version 2: rfc-editor.org/pdfrfc/rfc2328.txt.pdf , in page 195 where the information database packet is described, there is a field of
interface MTU
.– Josemi
yesterday
I don't think so, if you consult the rfc of OSPF, version 2: rfc-editor.org/pdfrfc/rfc2328.txt.pdf , in page 195 where the information database packet is described, there is a field of
interface MTU
.– Josemi
yesterday
@Josemi, from Why Are OSPF Neighbors Stuck in Exstart/Exchange State?: "OSPF states for adjacency formation are Down, Init, Attempt, 2-way, Exstart, Exchange, Loading and Full. There can be number of reasons why the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) neighbors are stuck in exstart/exchange state. This document focuses on an MTU mismatch between OSPF neighbors resulting in exstart/exchange state. For more details on troubleshooting OSPF refer to Troubleshooting OSPF."
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
@Josemi, from Why Are OSPF Neighbors Stuck in Exstart/Exchange State?: "OSPF states for adjacency formation are Down, Init, Attempt, 2-way, Exstart, Exchange, Loading and Full. There can be number of reasons why the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) neighbors are stuck in exstart/exchange state. This document focuses on an MTU mismatch between OSPF neighbors resulting in exstart/exchange state. For more details on troubleshooting OSPF refer to Troubleshooting OSPF."
– Ron Maupin♦
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f55931%2fhow-does-a-router-know-the-mtu-of-a-network%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown