Presentation of group equal to trivial group












11















Problem: Show that the group given by the presentation $$langle x,y,z mid xyx^{-1}y^{-2}, , , yzy^{-1}z^{-2}, , , zxz^{-1}x^{-2} rangle $$ is equivalent to the trivial group.




I have tried all sorts of manners to try to show that the relations given by the presentation above imply that $x=y=z=e$. However, I am stuck and would appreciate any hints as to how I should move forward.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Do you know any reference where you found this question. I saw it in previous year question paper of my institution.
    – Bhaskar Vashishth
    Feb 5 '15 at 21:53
















11















Problem: Show that the group given by the presentation $$langle x,y,z mid xyx^{-1}y^{-2}, , , yzy^{-1}z^{-2}, , , zxz^{-1}x^{-2} rangle $$ is equivalent to the trivial group.




I have tried all sorts of manners to try to show that the relations given by the presentation above imply that $x=y=z=e$. However, I am stuck and would appreciate any hints as to how I should move forward.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Do you know any reference where you found this question. I saw it in previous year question paper of my institution.
    – Bhaskar Vashishth
    Feb 5 '15 at 21:53














11












11








11


4






Problem: Show that the group given by the presentation $$langle x,y,z mid xyx^{-1}y^{-2}, , , yzy^{-1}z^{-2}, , , zxz^{-1}x^{-2} rangle $$ is equivalent to the trivial group.




I have tried all sorts of manners to try to show that the relations given by the presentation above imply that $x=y=z=e$. However, I am stuck and would appreciate any hints as to how I should move forward.










share|cite|improve this question
















Problem: Show that the group given by the presentation $$langle x,y,z mid xyx^{-1}y^{-2}, , , yzy^{-1}z^{-2}, , , zxz^{-1}x^{-2} rangle $$ is equivalent to the trivial group.




I have tried all sorts of manners to try to show that the relations given by the presentation above imply that $x=y=z=e$. However, I am stuck and would appreciate any hints as to how I should move forward.







abstract-algebra group-theory algebraic-topology group-presentation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 5 '15 at 21:44









Paul Plummer

5,20721950




5,20721950










asked Nov 15 '14 at 20:39









JessJess

476616




476616












  • Do you know any reference where you found this question. I saw it in previous year question paper of my institution.
    – Bhaskar Vashishth
    Feb 5 '15 at 21:53


















  • Do you know any reference where you found this question. I saw it in previous year question paper of my institution.
    – Bhaskar Vashishth
    Feb 5 '15 at 21:53
















Do you know any reference where you found this question. I saw it in previous year question paper of my institution.
– Bhaskar Vashishth
Feb 5 '15 at 21:53




Do you know any reference where you found this question. I saw it in previous year question paper of my institution.
– Bhaskar Vashishth
Feb 5 '15 at 21:53










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















16





+50









This is a very well-known presentation of the trivial group, to be compared with the presentation of Higman's infinite group with no finite quotient. I do not know of any easy proof.



The proof I'm going to give is due to Bernhard Neumann in An Essay on Free Products of Groups with Amalgamations (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 246, 919 (1954), pp. 503-554.)



So we have to prove that in a group satisfying
$$ xyx^{-1} = y^2 qquad (R_1)$$
$$ yzy^{-1} = z^2 qquad (R_2)$$
$$ zxz^{-1} = x^2 qquad (R_3)$$
the elements $x$, $y$ and $z$ are trivial.



By inverting $(R_1)$, multiplying on the left by $y$ and on the right by $x$, we get $$yxy^{-1} = y^{-1}x.$$ This easily gives $$y^i x y^{-i} = y^{-i} x qquad(R_1^{[i]}),$$ for every integer $i$, by induction. The same argument on the second relation gives $$z^i y z^{-i} = z^{-i} y. qquad (R_2^{[i]})$$



If we now conjugate $(R_3)$ by $y$, the left-hand side becomes
$$begin{align}yzxz^{-1}y^{-1} &= z^2ycdot x cdot y^{-1}z^{-2}\
& = z^2y^{-1}xz^{-2}\
& = z^2 y^{-1}z^{-2}cdot z^2xz^{-2}\
& = y^{-1}z^2cdot x^4
end{align}$$

(the first equality is a double use of the relation $yz = z^2y$, a reformulation of $(R_2)$ ; the second uses $(R_1^{[1]})$ and the last uses the inverse of $(R_2^{[2]})$ and $R_3$ twice).



On the other hand, the left side becomes
$$begin{align} yx^2y^{-1} &= (y^{-1}x)^2 \
&= y^{-1}xy^{-1}x \
&= y^{-3}x^2
end{align}$$

(the first equality uses the $(R_1^{[1]})$ twice, the last uses the inverse of $(R_1)$).



Put together, we have proven $y^{-1}z^2x^4 = y^{-3}x^2$, which gives
$$z^2 = y^{-2}x^{-2}.qquad (R^*)$$



If we conjugate $y$ by $z^{-2}$, we now get on the one hand
$$begin{align}z^{-2}y z^2 &= x^2 y^2 cdot y cdot y^{-2} x^{-2} \
&= x^2 y x^{-2} \
&= y^4
end{align}$$

(the first equality uses $(R^*)$ twice, the last uses $(R_1)$ twice.) But, on the other hand, $z^{-2}yz^2 = z^2 y$ because of $(R_2^{[-2]}$). So we finally get $z^2 y = y^4$, which translates to
$$z^2 = y^3.$$



This proves that $y$ and $z^2$ commute. The relation $(R_2)$ then boils down to $z = z^2$, which gives $z = 1$. Because of the symmetries in the presentation, this proves that the group is trivial.



Not very enlightening, but the fact that the corresponding group with 4 generators is highly nontrivial somehow reduces my hopes of ever finding a "good reason" for this group to be trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer































    2














    Here is a proof-



    $G=langle x,y,z mid xyx^{-1}=y^{2}, , , yzy^{-1}=z^{2}, , , zxz^{-1}=x^{2} rangle$. See that $xyx^{-1}y^{-1}=y$ tells you that $y$ belongs in the Commutator subgroup generated by $x$ and $y$ and similarly $x$ belongs in Commutator subgroup generated by $x$ and $z$ and $z$ belongs in Commutator subgroup generated by $z$ and $y$ and Now this gives you that $G$ is perfect i.e. $G=G'$. Now If you can prove $G$ is solvable , you are done as only perfect solvable group is trivial group.



    So consider the subgroup generated by $H=langle x,y rangle$ and show that $H$ is solvable. For that consider $H_1=langle y rangle < H$ and it is easily seen that $H_1 unlhd H$ so what is factor group $H/H_1$? Yeah correct, $H/H_1 cong langle x rangle$ which is abelian and hence $H$ is solvable.



    Now only thing remains is to check that $H=G$, i.e. $z in langle x,y rangle$. Now is the tedious calculation work you will have to do, in order to prove this, use the relators given and express $z$ in terms of $x$ and $y$.



    I hope this helps!






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1023341%2fpresentation-of-group-equal-to-trivial-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      16





      +50









      This is a very well-known presentation of the trivial group, to be compared with the presentation of Higman's infinite group with no finite quotient. I do not know of any easy proof.



      The proof I'm going to give is due to Bernhard Neumann in An Essay on Free Products of Groups with Amalgamations (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 246, 919 (1954), pp. 503-554.)



      So we have to prove that in a group satisfying
      $$ xyx^{-1} = y^2 qquad (R_1)$$
      $$ yzy^{-1} = z^2 qquad (R_2)$$
      $$ zxz^{-1} = x^2 qquad (R_3)$$
      the elements $x$, $y$ and $z$ are trivial.



      By inverting $(R_1)$, multiplying on the left by $y$ and on the right by $x$, we get $$yxy^{-1} = y^{-1}x.$$ This easily gives $$y^i x y^{-i} = y^{-i} x qquad(R_1^{[i]}),$$ for every integer $i$, by induction. The same argument on the second relation gives $$z^i y z^{-i} = z^{-i} y. qquad (R_2^{[i]})$$



      If we now conjugate $(R_3)$ by $y$, the left-hand side becomes
      $$begin{align}yzxz^{-1}y^{-1} &= z^2ycdot x cdot y^{-1}z^{-2}\
      & = z^2y^{-1}xz^{-2}\
      & = z^2 y^{-1}z^{-2}cdot z^2xz^{-2}\
      & = y^{-1}z^2cdot x^4
      end{align}$$

      (the first equality is a double use of the relation $yz = z^2y$, a reformulation of $(R_2)$ ; the second uses $(R_1^{[1]})$ and the last uses the inverse of $(R_2^{[2]})$ and $R_3$ twice).



      On the other hand, the left side becomes
      $$begin{align} yx^2y^{-1} &= (y^{-1}x)^2 \
      &= y^{-1}xy^{-1}x \
      &= y^{-3}x^2
      end{align}$$

      (the first equality uses the $(R_1^{[1]})$ twice, the last uses the inverse of $(R_1)$).



      Put together, we have proven $y^{-1}z^2x^4 = y^{-3}x^2$, which gives
      $$z^2 = y^{-2}x^{-2}.qquad (R^*)$$



      If we conjugate $y$ by $z^{-2}$, we now get on the one hand
      $$begin{align}z^{-2}y z^2 &= x^2 y^2 cdot y cdot y^{-2} x^{-2} \
      &= x^2 y x^{-2} \
      &= y^4
      end{align}$$

      (the first equality uses $(R^*)$ twice, the last uses $(R_1)$ twice.) But, on the other hand, $z^{-2}yz^2 = z^2 y$ because of $(R_2^{[-2]}$). So we finally get $z^2 y = y^4$, which translates to
      $$z^2 = y^3.$$



      This proves that $y$ and $z^2$ commute. The relation $(R_2)$ then boils down to $z = z^2$, which gives $z = 1$. Because of the symmetries in the presentation, this proves that the group is trivial.



      Not very enlightening, but the fact that the corresponding group with 4 generators is highly nontrivial somehow reduces my hopes of ever finding a "good reason" for this group to be trivial.






      share|cite|improve this answer




























        16





        +50









        This is a very well-known presentation of the trivial group, to be compared with the presentation of Higman's infinite group with no finite quotient. I do not know of any easy proof.



        The proof I'm going to give is due to Bernhard Neumann in An Essay on Free Products of Groups with Amalgamations (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 246, 919 (1954), pp. 503-554.)



        So we have to prove that in a group satisfying
        $$ xyx^{-1} = y^2 qquad (R_1)$$
        $$ yzy^{-1} = z^2 qquad (R_2)$$
        $$ zxz^{-1} = x^2 qquad (R_3)$$
        the elements $x$, $y$ and $z$ are trivial.



        By inverting $(R_1)$, multiplying on the left by $y$ and on the right by $x$, we get $$yxy^{-1} = y^{-1}x.$$ This easily gives $$y^i x y^{-i} = y^{-i} x qquad(R_1^{[i]}),$$ for every integer $i$, by induction. The same argument on the second relation gives $$z^i y z^{-i} = z^{-i} y. qquad (R_2^{[i]})$$



        If we now conjugate $(R_3)$ by $y$, the left-hand side becomes
        $$begin{align}yzxz^{-1}y^{-1} &= z^2ycdot x cdot y^{-1}z^{-2}\
        & = z^2y^{-1}xz^{-2}\
        & = z^2 y^{-1}z^{-2}cdot z^2xz^{-2}\
        & = y^{-1}z^2cdot x^4
        end{align}$$

        (the first equality is a double use of the relation $yz = z^2y$, a reformulation of $(R_2)$ ; the second uses $(R_1^{[1]})$ and the last uses the inverse of $(R_2^{[2]})$ and $R_3$ twice).



        On the other hand, the left side becomes
        $$begin{align} yx^2y^{-1} &= (y^{-1}x)^2 \
        &= y^{-1}xy^{-1}x \
        &= y^{-3}x^2
        end{align}$$

        (the first equality uses the $(R_1^{[1]})$ twice, the last uses the inverse of $(R_1)$).



        Put together, we have proven $y^{-1}z^2x^4 = y^{-3}x^2$, which gives
        $$z^2 = y^{-2}x^{-2}.qquad (R^*)$$



        If we conjugate $y$ by $z^{-2}$, we now get on the one hand
        $$begin{align}z^{-2}y z^2 &= x^2 y^2 cdot y cdot y^{-2} x^{-2} \
        &= x^2 y x^{-2} \
        &= y^4
        end{align}$$

        (the first equality uses $(R^*)$ twice, the last uses $(R_1)$ twice.) But, on the other hand, $z^{-2}yz^2 = z^2 y$ because of $(R_2^{[-2]}$). So we finally get $z^2 y = y^4$, which translates to
        $$z^2 = y^3.$$



        This proves that $y$ and $z^2$ commute. The relation $(R_2)$ then boils down to $z = z^2$, which gives $z = 1$. Because of the symmetries in the presentation, this proves that the group is trivial.



        Not very enlightening, but the fact that the corresponding group with 4 generators is highly nontrivial somehow reduces my hopes of ever finding a "good reason" for this group to be trivial.






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          16





          +50







          16





          +50



          16




          +50




          This is a very well-known presentation of the trivial group, to be compared with the presentation of Higman's infinite group with no finite quotient. I do not know of any easy proof.



          The proof I'm going to give is due to Bernhard Neumann in An Essay on Free Products of Groups with Amalgamations (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 246, 919 (1954), pp. 503-554.)



          So we have to prove that in a group satisfying
          $$ xyx^{-1} = y^2 qquad (R_1)$$
          $$ yzy^{-1} = z^2 qquad (R_2)$$
          $$ zxz^{-1} = x^2 qquad (R_3)$$
          the elements $x$, $y$ and $z$ are trivial.



          By inverting $(R_1)$, multiplying on the left by $y$ and on the right by $x$, we get $$yxy^{-1} = y^{-1}x.$$ This easily gives $$y^i x y^{-i} = y^{-i} x qquad(R_1^{[i]}),$$ for every integer $i$, by induction. The same argument on the second relation gives $$z^i y z^{-i} = z^{-i} y. qquad (R_2^{[i]})$$



          If we now conjugate $(R_3)$ by $y$, the left-hand side becomes
          $$begin{align}yzxz^{-1}y^{-1} &= z^2ycdot x cdot y^{-1}z^{-2}\
          & = z^2y^{-1}xz^{-2}\
          & = z^2 y^{-1}z^{-2}cdot z^2xz^{-2}\
          & = y^{-1}z^2cdot x^4
          end{align}$$

          (the first equality is a double use of the relation $yz = z^2y$, a reformulation of $(R_2)$ ; the second uses $(R_1^{[1]})$ and the last uses the inverse of $(R_2^{[2]})$ and $R_3$ twice).



          On the other hand, the left side becomes
          $$begin{align} yx^2y^{-1} &= (y^{-1}x)^2 \
          &= y^{-1}xy^{-1}x \
          &= y^{-3}x^2
          end{align}$$

          (the first equality uses the $(R_1^{[1]})$ twice, the last uses the inverse of $(R_1)$).



          Put together, we have proven $y^{-1}z^2x^4 = y^{-3}x^2$, which gives
          $$z^2 = y^{-2}x^{-2}.qquad (R^*)$$



          If we conjugate $y$ by $z^{-2}$, we now get on the one hand
          $$begin{align}z^{-2}y z^2 &= x^2 y^2 cdot y cdot y^{-2} x^{-2} \
          &= x^2 y x^{-2} \
          &= y^4
          end{align}$$

          (the first equality uses $(R^*)$ twice, the last uses $(R_1)$ twice.) But, on the other hand, $z^{-2}yz^2 = z^2 y$ because of $(R_2^{[-2]}$). So we finally get $z^2 y = y^4$, which translates to
          $$z^2 = y^3.$$



          This proves that $y$ and $z^2$ commute. The relation $(R_2)$ then boils down to $z = z^2$, which gives $z = 1$. Because of the symmetries in the presentation, this proves that the group is trivial.



          Not very enlightening, but the fact that the corresponding group with 4 generators is highly nontrivial somehow reduces my hopes of ever finding a "good reason" for this group to be trivial.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          This is a very well-known presentation of the trivial group, to be compared with the presentation of Higman's infinite group with no finite quotient. I do not know of any easy proof.



          The proof I'm going to give is due to Bernhard Neumann in An Essay on Free Products of Groups with Amalgamations (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 246, 919 (1954), pp. 503-554.)



          So we have to prove that in a group satisfying
          $$ xyx^{-1} = y^2 qquad (R_1)$$
          $$ yzy^{-1} = z^2 qquad (R_2)$$
          $$ zxz^{-1} = x^2 qquad (R_3)$$
          the elements $x$, $y$ and $z$ are trivial.



          By inverting $(R_1)$, multiplying on the left by $y$ and on the right by $x$, we get $$yxy^{-1} = y^{-1}x.$$ This easily gives $$y^i x y^{-i} = y^{-i} x qquad(R_1^{[i]}),$$ for every integer $i$, by induction. The same argument on the second relation gives $$z^i y z^{-i} = z^{-i} y. qquad (R_2^{[i]})$$



          If we now conjugate $(R_3)$ by $y$, the left-hand side becomes
          $$begin{align}yzxz^{-1}y^{-1} &= z^2ycdot x cdot y^{-1}z^{-2}\
          & = z^2y^{-1}xz^{-2}\
          & = z^2 y^{-1}z^{-2}cdot z^2xz^{-2}\
          & = y^{-1}z^2cdot x^4
          end{align}$$

          (the first equality is a double use of the relation $yz = z^2y$, a reformulation of $(R_2)$ ; the second uses $(R_1^{[1]})$ and the last uses the inverse of $(R_2^{[2]})$ and $R_3$ twice).



          On the other hand, the left side becomes
          $$begin{align} yx^2y^{-1} &= (y^{-1}x)^2 \
          &= y^{-1}xy^{-1}x \
          &= y^{-3}x^2
          end{align}$$

          (the first equality uses the $(R_1^{[1]})$ twice, the last uses the inverse of $(R_1)$).



          Put together, we have proven $y^{-1}z^2x^4 = y^{-3}x^2$, which gives
          $$z^2 = y^{-2}x^{-2}.qquad (R^*)$$



          If we conjugate $y$ by $z^{-2}$, we now get on the one hand
          $$begin{align}z^{-2}y z^2 &= x^2 y^2 cdot y cdot y^{-2} x^{-2} \
          &= x^2 y x^{-2} \
          &= y^4
          end{align}$$

          (the first equality uses $(R^*)$ twice, the last uses $(R_1)$ twice.) But, on the other hand, $z^{-2}yz^2 = z^2 y$ because of $(R_2^{[-2]}$). So we finally get $z^2 y = y^4$, which translates to
          $$z^2 = y^3.$$



          This proves that $y$ and $z^2$ commute. The relation $(R_2)$ then boils down to $z = z^2$, which gives $z = 1$. Because of the symmetries in the presentation, this proves that the group is trivial.



          Not very enlightening, but the fact that the corresponding group with 4 generators is highly nontrivial somehow reduces my hopes of ever finding a "good reason" for this group to be trivial.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 4 at 12:16









          Shaun

          8,820113681




          8,820113681










          answered Feb 6 '15 at 8:27









          PseudoNeoPseudoNeo

          6,4441952




          6,4441952























              2














              Here is a proof-



              $G=langle x,y,z mid xyx^{-1}=y^{2}, , , yzy^{-1}=z^{2}, , , zxz^{-1}=x^{2} rangle$. See that $xyx^{-1}y^{-1}=y$ tells you that $y$ belongs in the Commutator subgroup generated by $x$ and $y$ and similarly $x$ belongs in Commutator subgroup generated by $x$ and $z$ and $z$ belongs in Commutator subgroup generated by $z$ and $y$ and Now this gives you that $G$ is perfect i.e. $G=G'$. Now If you can prove $G$ is solvable , you are done as only perfect solvable group is trivial group.



              So consider the subgroup generated by $H=langle x,y rangle$ and show that $H$ is solvable. For that consider $H_1=langle y rangle < H$ and it is easily seen that $H_1 unlhd H$ so what is factor group $H/H_1$? Yeah correct, $H/H_1 cong langle x rangle$ which is abelian and hence $H$ is solvable.



              Now only thing remains is to check that $H=G$, i.e. $z in langle x,y rangle$. Now is the tedious calculation work you will have to do, in order to prove this, use the relators given and express $z$ in terms of $x$ and $y$.



              I hope this helps!






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                2














                Here is a proof-



                $G=langle x,y,z mid xyx^{-1}=y^{2}, , , yzy^{-1}=z^{2}, , , zxz^{-1}=x^{2} rangle$. See that $xyx^{-1}y^{-1}=y$ tells you that $y$ belongs in the Commutator subgroup generated by $x$ and $y$ and similarly $x$ belongs in Commutator subgroup generated by $x$ and $z$ and $z$ belongs in Commutator subgroup generated by $z$ and $y$ and Now this gives you that $G$ is perfect i.e. $G=G'$. Now If you can prove $G$ is solvable , you are done as only perfect solvable group is trivial group.



                So consider the subgroup generated by $H=langle x,y rangle$ and show that $H$ is solvable. For that consider $H_1=langle y rangle < H$ and it is easily seen that $H_1 unlhd H$ so what is factor group $H/H_1$? Yeah correct, $H/H_1 cong langle x rangle$ which is abelian and hence $H$ is solvable.



                Now only thing remains is to check that $H=G$, i.e. $z in langle x,y rangle$. Now is the tedious calculation work you will have to do, in order to prove this, use the relators given and express $z$ in terms of $x$ and $y$.



                I hope this helps!






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  2












                  2








                  2






                  Here is a proof-



                  $G=langle x,y,z mid xyx^{-1}=y^{2}, , , yzy^{-1}=z^{2}, , , zxz^{-1}=x^{2} rangle$. See that $xyx^{-1}y^{-1}=y$ tells you that $y$ belongs in the Commutator subgroup generated by $x$ and $y$ and similarly $x$ belongs in Commutator subgroup generated by $x$ and $z$ and $z$ belongs in Commutator subgroup generated by $z$ and $y$ and Now this gives you that $G$ is perfect i.e. $G=G'$. Now If you can prove $G$ is solvable , you are done as only perfect solvable group is trivial group.



                  So consider the subgroup generated by $H=langle x,y rangle$ and show that $H$ is solvable. For that consider $H_1=langle y rangle < H$ and it is easily seen that $H_1 unlhd H$ so what is factor group $H/H_1$? Yeah correct, $H/H_1 cong langle x rangle$ which is abelian and hence $H$ is solvable.



                  Now only thing remains is to check that $H=G$, i.e. $z in langle x,y rangle$. Now is the tedious calculation work you will have to do, in order to prove this, use the relators given and express $z$ in terms of $x$ and $y$.



                  I hope this helps!






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Here is a proof-



                  $G=langle x,y,z mid xyx^{-1}=y^{2}, , , yzy^{-1}=z^{2}, , , zxz^{-1}=x^{2} rangle$. See that $xyx^{-1}y^{-1}=y$ tells you that $y$ belongs in the Commutator subgroup generated by $x$ and $y$ and similarly $x$ belongs in Commutator subgroup generated by $x$ and $z$ and $z$ belongs in Commutator subgroup generated by $z$ and $y$ and Now this gives you that $G$ is perfect i.e. $G=G'$. Now If you can prove $G$ is solvable , you are done as only perfect solvable group is trivial group.



                  So consider the subgroup generated by $H=langle x,y rangle$ and show that $H$ is solvable. For that consider $H_1=langle y rangle < H$ and it is easily seen that $H_1 unlhd H$ so what is factor group $H/H_1$? Yeah correct, $H/H_1 cong langle x rangle$ which is abelian and hence $H$ is solvable.



                  Now only thing remains is to check that $H=G$, i.e. $z in langle x,y rangle$. Now is the tedious calculation work you will have to do, in order to prove this, use the relators given and express $z$ in terms of $x$ and $y$.



                  I hope this helps!







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Feb 26 '15 at 11:57









                  Bhaskar VashishthBhaskar Vashishth

                  7,59712053




                  7,59712053






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1023341%2fpresentation-of-group-equal-to-trivial-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      An IMO inspired problem

                      Management

                      Investment