Can a dancing sword be used continuously?












9














I just noticed, reading the Dungeons & Dragons 5E DMG that there appears to be a difference between the dancing sword from previous editions. Unlike previous editions, there doesn't seem to be any "after dancing, the weapon can’t dance (attack on its own) again for 4 rounds" clause in 5E. (This particular quote came from the 3.5 SRD)



However, even in 5E there's still this bit in the dancing sword's description:




After the hovering sword attacks for the fourth time, it flies up to
30 feet and tries to return to your hand.




But:




  1. Is there any reason you can't just use a bonus action to toss this
    magic sword into the air and speak the command word once more,
    effectively having the sword dance every round all day?

  2. In what way is the "return to hand after four rounds" a limitation
    at all in practice, assuming there are no limits to dancing? There
    seems to be zero difference between using your bonus action to
    have it dance, and using your bonus action keep it dancing.










share|improve this question





























    9














    I just noticed, reading the Dungeons & Dragons 5E DMG that there appears to be a difference between the dancing sword from previous editions. Unlike previous editions, there doesn't seem to be any "after dancing, the weapon can’t dance (attack on its own) again for 4 rounds" clause in 5E. (This particular quote came from the 3.5 SRD)



    However, even in 5E there's still this bit in the dancing sword's description:




    After the hovering sword attacks for the fourth time, it flies up to
    30 feet and tries to return to your hand.




    But:




    1. Is there any reason you can't just use a bonus action to toss this
      magic sword into the air and speak the command word once more,
      effectively having the sword dance every round all day?

    2. In what way is the "return to hand after four rounds" a limitation
      at all in practice, assuming there are no limits to dancing? There
      seems to be zero difference between using your bonus action to
      have it dance, and using your bonus action keep it dancing.










    share|improve this question



























      9












      9








      9







      I just noticed, reading the Dungeons & Dragons 5E DMG that there appears to be a difference between the dancing sword from previous editions. Unlike previous editions, there doesn't seem to be any "after dancing, the weapon can’t dance (attack on its own) again for 4 rounds" clause in 5E. (This particular quote came from the 3.5 SRD)



      However, even in 5E there's still this bit in the dancing sword's description:




      After the hovering sword attacks for the fourth time, it flies up to
      30 feet and tries to return to your hand.




      But:




      1. Is there any reason you can't just use a bonus action to toss this
        magic sword into the air and speak the command word once more,
        effectively having the sword dance every round all day?

      2. In what way is the "return to hand after four rounds" a limitation
        at all in practice, assuming there are no limits to dancing? There
        seems to be zero difference between using your bonus action to
        have it dance, and using your bonus action keep it dancing.










      share|improve this question















      I just noticed, reading the Dungeons & Dragons 5E DMG that there appears to be a difference between the dancing sword from previous editions. Unlike previous editions, there doesn't seem to be any "after dancing, the weapon can’t dance (attack on its own) again for 4 rounds" clause in 5E. (This particular quote came from the 3.5 SRD)



      However, even in 5E there's still this bit in the dancing sword's description:




      After the hovering sword attacks for the fourth time, it flies up to
      30 feet and tries to return to your hand.




      But:




      1. Is there any reason you can't just use a bonus action to toss this
        magic sword into the air and speak the command word once more,
        effectively having the sword dance every round all day?

      2. In what way is the "return to hand after four rounds" a limitation
        at all in practice, assuming there are no limits to dancing? There
        seems to be zero difference between using your bonus action to
        have it dance, and using your bonus action keep it dancing.







      dnd-5e magic-items






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      V2Blast

      19.8k357123




      19.8k357123










      asked yesterday









      CapnZappCapnZapp

      34228




      34228






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          15














          The sword might not make it back



          So first thing is that the blade doesn't always make it back:




          If you have no hand free, it falls to the ground at your feet. If the sword has no unobstructed path to you, it moves as close to you as it can and then falls to the ground. It also ceases to hover if you grasp it or move more than 30 feet away from it.




          If this happens, you are obviously going to need to move to the weapon and pick it up if you can. However, if you already used your bonus action to have the weapon move and attack (or for anything else) then you will not be able to reactivate it that turn.



          Remember you must have the weapon in hand to cause it to activate it:




          You can use a bonus action to toss this magic sword into the air and speak the command word.




          So there is a difference, you cannot use a bonus action to keep the blade dancing only to start it dancing again.



          Assuming the blade returns safely every time there's no reason you can't have it hovering almost all the time



          After returning to you, you can use your bonus action next turn (you've already used it this turn to have it move/attack). But other than that there's nothing restricting you from using the feature again next turn. With smart usage, you could be able to have it hovering almost every round if you wanted.



          Note that it's clear that the designers did not want a limit put on it. If they did, they would have kept the wording from previous editions. They just have had their own reasons for doing so. Perhaps the use of the bonus action was deemed cost enough. For some characters, this is a very valuable resource. However, for others, it's not at all.



          Whatever the reason, as long as you can get the weapon back into your hand, there's really no limit on you using it every round.



          Different editions make a lot of changes



          There are many changes made with each new edition of D&D. Honestly it's best to think of each version of D&D as a completely different game with different rules in a lot of ways. Given that, I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was kept exactly the same from 3.5 through 4e and into 5e.



          There's a lot of reasons the change could have been made, but the important part is to realize that changes were clearly made and it no longer functions as it did in 3.5






          share|improve this answer























          • Thx. So the "dancing property" really has changed in this edition then? No more use four, don't use four, use four... ?
            – CapnZapp
            yesterday






          • 6




            @CapnZapp correct! Honestly it's best to think of reach version of D&D as a completely different game. I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was exactly the same.
            – Rubiksmoose
            yesterday












          • @Rubriksmoose you mean "each" not "reach" right? (Considering the unrelated Q I just posted I got jittery :-) Thx
            – CapnZapp
            yesterday










          • @CapnZapp you are correct just a typo. I meant each.
            – Rubiksmoose
            yesterday











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138549%2fcan-a-dancing-sword-be-used-continuously%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          15














          The sword might not make it back



          So first thing is that the blade doesn't always make it back:




          If you have no hand free, it falls to the ground at your feet. If the sword has no unobstructed path to you, it moves as close to you as it can and then falls to the ground. It also ceases to hover if you grasp it or move more than 30 feet away from it.




          If this happens, you are obviously going to need to move to the weapon and pick it up if you can. However, if you already used your bonus action to have the weapon move and attack (or for anything else) then you will not be able to reactivate it that turn.



          Remember you must have the weapon in hand to cause it to activate it:




          You can use a bonus action to toss this magic sword into the air and speak the command word.




          So there is a difference, you cannot use a bonus action to keep the blade dancing only to start it dancing again.



          Assuming the blade returns safely every time there's no reason you can't have it hovering almost all the time



          After returning to you, you can use your bonus action next turn (you've already used it this turn to have it move/attack). But other than that there's nothing restricting you from using the feature again next turn. With smart usage, you could be able to have it hovering almost every round if you wanted.



          Note that it's clear that the designers did not want a limit put on it. If they did, they would have kept the wording from previous editions. They just have had their own reasons for doing so. Perhaps the use of the bonus action was deemed cost enough. For some characters, this is a very valuable resource. However, for others, it's not at all.



          Whatever the reason, as long as you can get the weapon back into your hand, there's really no limit on you using it every round.



          Different editions make a lot of changes



          There are many changes made with each new edition of D&D. Honestly it's best to think of each version of D&D as a completely different game with different rules in a lot of ways. Given that, I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was kept exactly the same from 3.5 through 4e and into 5e.



          There's a lot of reasons the change could have been made, but the important part is to realize that changes were clearly made and it no longer functions as it did in 3.5






          share|improve this answer























          • Thx. So the "dancing property" really has changed in this edition then? No more use four, don't use four, use four... ?
            – CapnZapp
            yesterday






          • 6




            @CapnZapp correct! Honestly it's best to think of reach version of D&D as a completely different game. I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was exactly the same.
            – Rubiksmoose
            yesterday












          • @Rubriksmoose you mean "each" not "reach" right? (Considering the unrelated Q I just posted I got jittery :-) Thx
            – CapnZapp
            yesterday










          • @CapnZapp you are correct just a typo. I meant each.
            – Rubiksmoose
            yesterday
















          15














          The sword might not make it back



          So first thing is that the blade doesn't always make it back:




          If you have no hand free, it falls to the ground at your feet. If the sword has no unobstructed path to you, it moves as close to you as it can and then falls to the ground. It also ceases to hover if you grasp it or move more than 30 feet away from it.




          If this happens, you are obviously going to need to move to the weapon and pick it up if you can. However, if you already used your bonus action to have the weapon move and attack (or for anything else) then you will not be able to reactivate it that turn.



          Remember you must have the weapon in hand to cause it to activate it:




          You can use a bonus action to toss this magic sword into the air and speak the command word.




          So there is a difference, you cannot use a bonus action to keep the blade dancing only to start it dancing again.



          Assuming the blade returns safely every time there's no reason you can't have it hovering almost all the time



          After returning to you, you can use your bonus action next turn (you've already used it this turn to have it move/attack). But other than that there's nothing restricting you from using the feature again next turn. With smart usage, you could be able to have it hovering almost every round if you wanted.



          Note that it's clear that the designers did not want a limit put on it. If they did, they would have kept the wording from previous editions. They just have had their own reasons for doing so. Perhaps the use of the bonus action was deemed cost enough. For some characters, this is a very valuable resource. However, for others, it's not at all.



          Whatever the reason, as long as you can get the weapon back into your hand, there's really no limit on you using it every round.



          Different editions make a lot of changes



          There are many changes made with each new edition of D&D. Honestly it's best to think of each version of D&D as a completely different game with different rules in a lot of ways. Given that, I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was kept exactly the same from 3.5 through 4e and into 5e.



          There's a lot of reasons the change could have been made, but the important part is to realize that changes were clearly made and it no longer functions as it did in 3.5






          share|improve this answer























          • Thx. So the "dancing property" really has changed in this edition then? No more use four, don't use four, use four... ?
            – CapnZapp
            yesterday






          • 6




            @CapnZapp correct! Honestly it's best to think of reach version of D&D as a completely different game. I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was exactly the same.
            – Rubiksmoose
            yesterday












          • @Rubriksmoose you mean "each" not "reach" right? (Considering the unrelated Q I just posted I got jittery :-) Thx
            – CapnZapp
            yesterday










          • @CapnZapp you are correct just a typo. I meant each.
            – Rubiksmoose
            yesterday














          15












          15








          15






          The sword might not make it back



          So first thing is that the blade doesn't always make it back:




          If you have no hand free, it falls to the ground at your feet. If the sword has no unobstructed path to you, it moves as close to you as it can and then falls to the ground. It also ceases to hover if you grasp it or move more than 30 feet away from it.




          If this happens, you are obviously going to need to move to the weapon and pick it up if you can. However, if you already used your bonus action to have the weapon move and attack (or for anything else) then you will not be able to reactivate it that turn.



          Remember you must have the weapon in hand to cause it to activate it:




          You can use a bonus action to toss this magic sword into the air and speak the command word.




          So there is a difference, you cannot use a bonus action to keep the blade dancing only to start it dancing again.



          Assuming the blade returns safely every time there's no reason you can't have it hovering almost all the time



          After returning to you, you can use your bonus action next turn (you've already used it this turn to have it move/attack). But other than that there's nothing restricting you from using the feature again next turn. With smart usage, you could be able to have it hovering almost every round if you wanted.



          Note that it's clear that the designers did not want a limit put on it. If they did, they would have kept the wording from previous editions. They just have had their own reasons for doing so. Perhaps the use of the bonus action was deemed cost enough. For some characters, this is a very valuable resource. However, for others, it's not at all.



          Whatever the reason, as long as you can get the weapon back into your hand, there's really no limit on you using it every round.



          Different editions make a lot of changes



          There are many changes made with each new edition of D&D. Honestly it's best to think of each version of D&D as a completely different game with different rules in a lot of ways. Given that, I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was kept exactly the same from 3.5 through 4e and into 5e.



          There's a lot of reasons the change could have been made, but the important part is to realize that changes were clearly made and it no longer functions as it did in 3.5






          share|improve this answer














          The sword might not make it back



          So first thing is that the blade doesn't always make it back:




          If you have no hand free, it falls to the ground at your feet. If the sword has no unobstructed path to you, it moves as close to you as it can and then falls to the ground. It also ceases to hover if you grasp it or move more than 30 feet away from it.




          If this happens, you are obviously going to need to move to the weapon and pick it up if you can. However, if you already used your bonus action to have the weapon move and attack (or for anything else) then you will not be able to reactivate it that turn.



          Remember you must have the weapon in hand to cause it to activate it:




          You can use a bonus action to toss this magic sword into the air and speak the command word.




          So there is a difference, you cannot use a bonus action to keep the blade dancing only to start it dancing again.



          Assuming the blade returns safely every time there's no reason you can't have it hovering almost all the time



          After returning to you, you can use your bonus action next turn (you've already used it this turn to have it move/attack). But other than that there's nothing restricting you from using the feature again next turn. With smart usage, you could be able to have it hovering almost every round if you wanted.



          Note that it's clear that the designers did not want a limit put on it. If they did, they would have kept the wording from previous editions. They just have had their own reasons for doing so. Perhaps the use of the bonus action was deemed cost enough. For some characters, this is a very valuable resource. However, for others, it's not at all.



          Whatever the reason, as long as you can get the weapon back into your hand, there's really no limit on you using it every round.



          Different editions make a lot of changes



          There are many changes made with each new edition of D&D. Honestly it's best to think of each version of D&D as a completely different game with different rules in a lot of ways. Given that, I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was kept exactly the same from 3.5 through 4e and into 5e.



          There's a lot of reasons the change could have been made, but the important part is to realize that changes were clearly made and it no longer functions as it did in 3.5







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 8 hours ago

























          answered yesterday









          RubiksmooseRubiksmoose

          48.9k6243369




          48.9k6243369












          • Thx. So the "dancing property" really has changed in this edition then? No more use four, don't use four, use four... ?
            – CapnZapp
            yesterday






          • 6




            @CapnZapp correct! Honestly it's best to think of reach version of D&D as a completely different game. I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was exactly the same.
            – Rubiksmoose
            yesterday












          • @Rubriksmoose you mean "each" not "reach" right? (Considering the unrelated Q I just posted I got jittery :-) Thx
            – CapnZapp
            yesterday










          • @CapnZapp you are correct just a typo. I meant each.
            – Rubiksmoose
            yesterday


















          • Thx. So the "dancing property" really has changed in this edition then? No more use four, don't use four, use four... ?
            – CapnZapp
            yesterday






          • 6




            @CapnZapp correct! Honestly it's best to think of reach version of D&D as a completely different game. I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was exactly the same.
            – Rubiksmoose
            yesterday












          • @Rubriksmoose you mean "each" not "reach" right? (Considering the unrelated Q I just posted I got jittery :-) Thx
            – CapnZapp
            yesterday










          • @CapnZapp you are correct just a typo. I meant each.
            – Rubiksmoose
            yesterday
















          Thx. So the "dancing property" really has changed in this edition then? No more use four, don't use four, use four... ?
          – CapnZapp
          yesterday




          Thx. So the "dancing property" really has changed in this edition then? No more use four, don't use four, use four... ?
          – CapnZapp
          yesterday




          6




          6




          @CapnZapp correct! Honestly it's best to think of reach version of D&D as a completely different game. I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was exactly the same.
          – Rubiksmoose
          yesterday






          @CapnZapp correct! Honestly it's best to think of reach version of D&D as a completely different game. I'd honestly be more surprised if the item was exactly the same.
          – Rubiksmoose
          yesterday














          @Rubriksmoose you mean "each" not "reach" right? (Considering the unrelated Q I just posted I got jittery :-) Thx
          – CapnZapp
          yesterday




          @Rubriksmoose you mean "each" not "reach" right? (Considering the unrelated Q I just posted I got jittery :-) Thx
          – CapnZapp
          yesterday












          @CapnZapp you are correct just a typo. I meant each.
          – Rubiksmoose
          yesterday




          @CapnZapp you are correct just a typo. I meant each.
          – Rubiksmoose
          yesterday


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138549%2fcan-a-dancing-sword-be-used-continuously%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          1300-talet

          1300-talet

          Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8