Find all solutions $T$ of $x^{2006} T = 0$ in the space of tempered distributions, $mathcal{S}'(mathbb{R})$
I'm modeling my solution after this answer to a similar question. This is as far as I've gotten:
Every $phi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$ that vanishes at $0$ can be expressed as $phi(x) = x psi (x)$. Then, $Tphi = xT(psi) = 0$ by assumption.
Fix $chi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$ such that $chi(0) = 1$. Let $Tchi = a$. Then, for any $phi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$, $$Tphi = T(phi - phi(0) chi + phi(0) chi) = T(phi - phi(0) chi) + T(phi(0) chi).$$
This is where I've gotten stuf. I'm not sure how, in the linked solution, the answer reduces from $T(phi - phi(0) chi) + T(phi(0) chi)$ to $0 + a phi(0)$ (my primary confusion is $T(phi - phi(0) chi) = 0$) nor how to adapt that for my own question.
Any suggestions?
functional-analysis distribution-theory schwartz-space
asked Jan 4 at 5:41
kkckkc
1308
New contributor
kkc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm modeling my solution after this answer to a similar question. This is as far as I've gotten:
Every $phi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$ that vanishes at $0$ can be expressed as $phi(x) = x psi (x)$. Then, $Tphi = xT(psi) = 0$ by assumption.
Fix $chi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$ such that $chi(0) = 1$. Let $Tchi = a$. Then, for any $phi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$, $$Tphi = T(phi - phi(0) chi + phi(0) chi) = T(phi - phi(0) chi) + T(phi(0) chi).$$
This is where I've gotten stuf. I'm not sure how, in the linked solution, the answer reduces from $T(phi - phi(0) chi) + T(phi(0) chi)$ to $0 + a phi(0)$ (my primary confusion is $T(phi - phi(0) chi) = 0$) nor how to adapt that for my own question.
Any suggestions?
functional-analysis distribution-theory schwartz-space
asked Jan 4 at 5:41
kkckkc
1308
New contributor
kkc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
You know that the distributions with $xT=0$ are the multiples of the Dirac delta distribution?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 4 at 5:45
@LordSharktheUnknown I don't know that. Could you explain further or refer me to the appropriate resource? I'm fairly new to distributions
– kkc
Jan 4 at 5:49
You have $[phi-phi(0)chi](0) = 0 $ obviously, and $phi-phi(0)chiinmathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$. So by the first argument $T(phi-phi(0)chi)=0$.
– Vobo
yesterday
add a comment |
I'm modeling my solution after this answer to a similar question. This is as far as I've gotten:
Every $phi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$ that vanishes at $0$ can be expressed as $phi(x) = x psi (x)$. Then, $Tphi = xT(psi) = 0$ by assumption.
Fix $chi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$ such that $chi(0) = 1$. Let $Tchi = a$. Then, for any $phi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$, $$Tphi = T(phi - phi(0) chi + phi(0) chi) = T(phi - phi(0) chi) + T(phi(0) chi).$$
This is where I've gotten stuf. I'm not sure how, in the linked solution, the answer reduces from $T(phi - phi(0) chi) + T(phi(0) chi)$ to $0 + a phi(0)$ (my primary confusion is $T(phi - phi(0) chi) = 0$) nor how to adapt that for my own question.
Any suggestions?
functional-analysis distribution-theory schwartz-space
asked Jan 4 at 5:41
kkckkc
1308
New contributor
kkc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm modeling my solution after this answer to a similar question. This is as far as I've gotten:
Every $phi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$ that vanishes at $0$ can be expressed as $phi(x) = x psi (x)$. Then, $Tphi = xT(psi) = 0$ by assumption.
Fix $chi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$ such that $chi(0) = 1$. Let $Tchi = a$. Then, for any $phi in mathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$, $$Tphi = T(phi - phi(0) chi + phi(0) chi) = T(phi - phi(0) chi) + T(phi(0) chi).$$
This is where I've gotten stuf. I'm not sure how, in the linked solution, the answer reduces from $T(phi - phi(0) chi) + T(phi(0) chi)$ to $0 + a phi(0)$ (my primary confusion is $T(phi - phi(0) chi) = 0$) nor how to adapt that for my own question.
Any suggestions?
functional-analysis distribution-theory schwartz-space
functional-analysis distribution-theory schwartz-space
asked Jan 4 at 5:41
kkckkc
1308
New contributor
kkc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 4 at 5:41
kkckkc
1308
New contributor
kkc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 4 at 5:41
kkckkc
1308
New contributor
kkc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 4 at 5:41
kkckkc
1308
asked Jan 4 at 5:41
kkckkc
1308
1308
New contributor
kkc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
kkc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
kkc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
You know that the distributions with $xT=0$ are the multiples of the Dirac delta distribution?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 4 at 5:45
@LordSharktheUnknown I don't know that. Could you explain further or refer me to the appropriate resource? I'm fairly new to distributions
– kkc
Jan 4 at 5:49
You have $[phi-phi(0)chi](0) = 0 $ obviously, and $phi-phi(0)chiinmathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$. So by the first argument $T(phi-phi(0)chi)=0$.
– Vobo
yesterday
add a comment |
1
You know that the distributions with $xT=0$ are the multiples of the Dirac delta distribution?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 4 at 5:45
@LordSharktheUnknown I don't know that. Could you explain further or refer me to the appropriate resource? I'm fairly new to distributions
– kkc
Jan 4 at 5:49
You have $[phi-phi(0)chi](0) = 0 $ obviously, and $phi-phi(0)chiinmathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$. So by the first argument $T(phi-phi(0)chi)=0$.
– Vobo
yesterday
1
1
You know that the distributions with $xT=0$ are the multiples of the Dirac delta distribution?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 4 at 5:45
You know that the distributions with $xT=0$ are the multiples of the Dirac delta distribution?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 4 at 5:45
@LordSharktheUnknown I don't know that. Could you explain further or refer me to the appropriate resource? I'm fairly new to distributions
– kkc
Jan 4 at 5:49
@LordSharktheUnknown I don't know that. Could you explain further or refer me to the appropriate resource? I'm fairly new to distributions
– kkc
Jan 4 at 5:49
You have $[phi-phi(0)chi](0) = 0 $ obviously, and $phi-phi(0)chiinmathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$. So by the first argument $T(phi-phi(0)chi)=0$.
– Vobo
yesterday
You have $[phi-phi(0)chi](0) = 0 $ obviously, and $phi-phi(0)chiinmathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$. So by the first argument $T(phi-phi(0)chi)=0$.
– Vobo
yesterday
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
kkc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061345%2ffind-all-solutions-t-of-x2006-t-0-in-the-space-of-tempered-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
kkc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
kkc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
kkc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
kkc is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061345%2ffind-all-solutions-t-of-x2006-t-0-in-the-space-of-tempered-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
You know that the distributions with $xT=0$ are the multiples of the Dirac delta distribution?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 4 at 5:45
@LordSharktheUnknown I don't know that. Could you explain further or refer me to the appropriate resource? I'm fairly new to distributions
– kkc
Jan 4 at 5:49
You have $[phi-phi(0)chi](0) = 0 $ obviously, and $phi-phi(0)chiinmathcal{S}(mathbb{R})$. So by the first argument $T(phi-phi(0)chi)=0$.
– Vobo
yesterday