Roots of polynomial equation in geometric progression












2















Find the relation between $a, b, c, d$ if the roots of $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$ are in geometric progression.



By considering $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(alpha+gamma)$ show that the above cubic equation has two roots equal in size but opposite in sign if and only if $ad=bc$.




I can do the second part if I am given some hints on the first. I can use $beta$ as the middle root and make $alpha=beta/r$ and $gamma=r times beta$, but haven't got anywhere so far.










share|cite|improve this question





























    2















    Find the relation between $a, b, c, d$ if the roots of $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$ are in geometric progression.



    By considering $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(alpha+gamma)$ show that the above cubic equation has two roots equal in size but opposite in sign if and only if $ad=bc$.




    I can do the second part if I am given some hints on the first. I can use $beta$ as the middle root and make $alpha=beta/r$ and $gamma=r times beta$, but haven't got anywhere so far.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2


      0






      Find the relation between $a, b, c, d$ if the roots of $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$ are in geometric progression.



      By considering $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(alpha+gamma)$ show that the above cubic equation has two roots equal in size but opposite in sign if and only if $ad=bc$.




      I can do the second part if I am given some hints on the first. I can use $beta$ as the middle root and make $alpha=beta/r$ and $gamma=r times beta$, but haven't got anywhere so far.










      share|cite|improve this question
















      Find the relation between $a, b, c, d$ if the roots of $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$ are in geometric progression.



      By considering $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(alpha+gamma)$ show that the above cubic equation has two roots equal in size but opposite in sign if and only if $ad=bc$.




      I can do the second part if I am given some hints on the first. I can use $beta$ as the middle root and make $alpha=beta/r$ and $gamma=r times beta$, but haven't got anywhere so far.







      polynomials






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Feb 5 '13 at 9:28









      Martin Sleziak

      44.7k8115271




      44.7k8115271










      asked Feb 1 '13 at 15:53









      bbr4inbbr4in

      177212




      177212






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          The monic polynomial with roots $beta/r,beta, rbeta$ is
          $$ x^3-betaleft(1+r+frac1rright) x^2+beta^2left(1+r+frac1rright)x-beta^3$$
          We find $beta=-frac cb$ and $beta^3=-frac da$, hence
          $$db^3=ac^3$$
          as necessary condition. Why is it also sufficient? What additional condition(s) would we need if we wanted the roots to be real?






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            0














            If $alpha, beta, gamma$ are the roots of $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$



            Using Vieta's Formulas, $$alpha+beta+gamma=-frac ba, alphabeta+betagamma+gammaalpha=frac ca,alphabetagamma=-frac da$$



            If $alpha,beta,gamma$ are in Geometric Progression, $fracbetaalpha=fracgammabeta$ is constant $=r$(say).
            Clearly, $alpha rne 0$



            $implies beta=alpha r, gamma=beta r=alpha r^2$



            $$implies alpha+alpha r+alpha r^2=-frac baimplies alpha(1+r+r^2)=-frac ba$$



            $$alphaalpha r+alpha ralpha r^2+alpha r^2alpha=frac caimplies alpha^2 r(1+r+r^2)=frac ca$$



            $$alphaalpha ralpha r^2=-frac daimplies alpha^3 r^3=-frac da$$



            So, $$frac{alpha^2 r(1+r+r^2)}{alpha(1+r+r^2)}=frac{frac ca}{-frac ba}implies alpha r=-frac cb text{ if }1+r+r^2ne0$$



            Then, $$left(-frac cbright)^3=-frac daimplies b^3d=c^3a$$



            If $1+r+r^2=0,$



            $b=c=0$
            and $r=frac{-1pmsqrt3}2$ i.e., r is a complex cube root of $1$



            So, the equation reduces to $ax^3+d=0$ whose roots are $left(-frac daright)^frac13,left(-frac daright)^frac13r, left(-frac daright)^frac13r^2$.



            So, we don't find any relationship among $a,b,c$ and $d$ here.





            In the 2nd case, let us find the equation whose roots are $alpha+beta,beta+gamma, gamma+alpha$ using the Transformation of Equations.



            If $y=alpha+beta=alpha+beta+gamma-gamma=-frac ba-gammaimplies gamma=-left(y+frac baright)$



            As $gamma$ is a root of the given equation, $-aleft(y+frac baright)^3+bleft(y+frac baright)^2-cleft(y+frac baright)+d=0$



            On simplification, $$ay^3+(cdots)y^2+(cdots)y^2+frac{bc-ad}a=0$$ whose roots are $alpha+beta,beta+gamma, gamma+alpha$



            Using Vieta's Formulas again, $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(gamma+alpha)=frac{ad-bc}{a^2}$



            If among $alpha,beta,gamma$ two have same absolute value but opposite sign, $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(gamma+alpha)=0implies ad=bc$ (the condition is necessary)



            Sufficiency: Again, if $ad=bc,$ $frac ab=frac cd=t$(say,) so $a=bt,c=dt$



            Then the equation becomes $$btx^3+bx^2+dtx+d=0implies bx^2(tx+1)+d(tx+1)=0$$



            So, $$(tx+1)(bx^2+d)=0$$ One root is $-frac1t$ What about the others?






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • $x=sqrt{-d/b}$ which is not really $1/t$, the thing we need?
              – bbr4in
              Feb 1 '13 at 21:59










            • @user52187, I left it for you to find the two roots other than $-frac1t=-frac ba=-frac dc$ to prove the proposition as it is after all a 'homework'.
              – lab bhattacharjee
              Feb 2 '13 at 3:27










            • So is what I wrote incorrect?
              – bbr4in
              Feb 3 '13 at 22:09










            • @user52187, no. You are right when you say $frac1tne pmsqrt{-frac db}$. But 'homework' is not supposed to be answered fully here as my last comment has pointed out.
              – lab bhattacharjee
              Feb 4 '13 at 3:29





















            0














            Suppose $a not = 0$ , let $p=frac{b}{a},q=frac{c}{a},r=frac{d}{a}$, then the equation is $$x^3+px^2+qx+r=0$$
            Using Vieta's Formulas,$$alpha + beta + gamma=-p \ alpha beta + beta gamma + alpha gamma =q \ alpha beta gamma = -r$$Suppose $beta^2=alpha gamma$, we get $$q^3=p^3r$$that is $$left { begin{array}{l} ac^3=b^3d \ a not = 0 \ d not = 0 end{array} right.$$
            Now we prove it is sufficient.
            $$q^3-p^3r \ =(alpha beta + beta gamma + alpha gamma)^3-alpha beta gamma(alpha + beta + gamma) \ = alpha^3beta^3+alpha^3gamma^3+beta^3gamma^3-alpha beta gamma(alpha^3+beta^3+gamma^3) \ = (alpha^2-beta gamma)(beta^2-alpha gamma)(gamma^2-alpha beta) \=0$$
            So the roots are in geometric progression.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f292159%2froots-of-polynomial-equation-in-geometric-progression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              The monic polynomial with roots $beta/r,beta, rbeta$ is
              $$ x^3-betaleft(1+r+frac1rright) x^2+beta^2left(1+r+frac1rright)x-beta^3$$
              We find $beta=-frac cb$ and $beta^3=-frac da$, hence
              $$db^3=ac^3$$
              as necessary condition. Why is it also sufficient? What additional condition(s) would we need if we wanted the roots to be real?






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                2














                The monic polynomial with roots $beta/r,beta, rbeta$ is
                $$ x^3-betaleft(1+r+frac1rright) x^2+beta^2left(1+r+frac1rright)x-beta^3$$
                We find $beta=-frac cb$ and $beta^3=-frac da$, hence
                $$db^3=ac^3$$
                as necessary condition. Why is it also sufficient? What additional condition(s) would we need if we wanted the roots to be real?






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  2












                  2








                  2






                  The monic polynomial with roots $beta/r,beta, rbeta$ is
                  $$ x^3-betaleft(1+r+frac1rright) x^2+beta^2left(1+r+frac1rright)x-beta^3$$
                  We find $beta=-frac cb$ and $beta^3=-frac da$, hence
                  $$db^3=ac^3$$
                  as necessary condition. Why is it also sufficient? What additional condition(s) would we need if we wanted the roots to be real?






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  The monic polynomial with roots $beta/r,beta, rbeta$ is
                  $$ x^3-betaleft(1+r+frac1rright) x^2+beta^2left(1+r+frac1rright)x-beta^3$$
                  We find $beta=-frac cb$ and $beta^3=-frac da$, hence
                  $$db^3=ac^3$$
                  as necessary condition. Why is it also sufficient? What additional condition(s) would we need if we wanted the roots to be real?







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Feb 1 '13 at 16:07









                  Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen

                  276k21269496




                  276k21269496























                      0














                      If $alpha, beta, gamma$ are the roots of $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$



                      Using Vieta's Formulas, $$alpha+beta+gamma=-frac ba, alphabeta+betagamma+gammaalpha=frac ca,alphabetagamma=-frac da$$



                      If $alpha,beta,gamma$ are in Geometric Progression, $fracbetaalpha=fracgammabeta$ is constant $=r$(say).
                      Clearly, $alpha rne 0$



                      $implies beta=alpha r, gamma=beta r=alpha r^2$



                      $$implies alpha+alpha r+alpha r^2=-frac baimplies alpha(1+r+r^2)=-frac ba$$



                      $$alphaalpha r+alpha ralpha r^2+alpha r^2alpha=frac caimplies alpha^2 r(1+r+r^2)=frac ca$$



                      $$alphaalpha ralpha r^2=-frac daimplies alpha^3 r^3=-frac da$$



                      So, $$frac{alpha^2 r(1+r+r^2)}{alpha(1+r+r^2)}=frac{frac ca}{-frac ba}implies alpha r=-frac cb text{ if }1+r+r^2ne0$$



                      Then, $$left(-frac cbright)^3=-frac daimplies b^3d=c^3a$$



                      If $1+r+r^2=0,$



                      $b=c=0$
                      and $r=frac{-1pmsqrt3}2$ i.e., r is a complex cube root of $1$



                      So, the equation reduces to $ax^3+d=0$ whose roots are $left(-frac daright)^frac13,left(-frac daright)^frac13r, left(-frac daright)^frac13r^2$.



                      So, we don't find any relationship among $a,b,c$ and $d$ here.





                      In the 2nd case, let us find the equation whose roots are $alpha+beta,beta+gamma, gamma+alpha$ using the Transformation of Equations.



                      If $y=alpha+beta=alpha+beta+gamma-gamma=-frac ba-gammaimplies gamma=-left(y+frac baright)$



                      As $gamma$ is a root of the given equation, $-aleft(y+frac baright)^3+bleft(y+frac baright)^2-cleft(y+frac baright)+d=0$



                      On simplification, $$ay^3+(cdots)y^2+(cdots)y^2+frac{bc-ad}a=0$$ whose roots are $alpha+beta,beta+gamma, gamma+alpha$



                      Using Vieta's Formulas again, $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(gamma+alpha)=frac{ad-bc}{a^2}$



                      If among $alpha,beta,gamma$ two have same absolute value but opposite sign, $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(gamma+alpha)=0implies ad=bc$ (the condition is necessary)



                      Sufficiency: Again, if $ad=bc,$ $frac ab=frac cd=t$(say,) so $a=bt,c=dt$



                      Then the equation becomes $$btx^3+bx^2+dtx+d=0implies bx^2(tx+1)+d(tx+1)=0$$



                      So, $$(tx+1)(bx^2+d)=0$$ One root is $-frac1t$ What about the others?






                      share|cite|improve this answer























                      • $x=sqrt{-d/b}$ which is not really $1/t$, the thing we need?
                        – bbr4in
                        Feb 1 '13 at 21:59










                      • @user52187, I left it for you to find the two roots other than $-frac1t=-frac ba=-frac dc$ to prove the proposition as it is after all a 'homework'.
                        – lab bhattacharjee
                        Feb 2 '13 at 3:27










                      • So is what I wrote incorrect?
                        – bbr4in
                        Feb 3 '13 at 22:09










                      • @user52187, no. You are right when you say $frac1tne pmsqrt{-frac db}$. But 'homework' is not supposed to be answered fully here as my last comment has pointed out.
                        – lab bhattacharjee
                        Feb 4 '13 at 3:29


















                      0














                      If $alpha, beta, gamma$ are the roots of $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$



                      Using Vieta's Formulas, $$alpha+beta+gamma=-frac ba, alphabeta+betagamma+gammaalpha=frac ca,alphabetagamma=-frac da$$



                      If $alpha,beta,gamma$ are in Geometric Progression, $fracbetaalpha=fracgammabeta$ is constant $=r$(say).
                      Clearly, $alpha rne 0$



                      $implies beta=alpha r, gamma=beta r=alpha r^2$



                      $$implies alpha+alpha r+alpha r^2=-frac baimplies alpha(1+r+r^2)=-frac ba$$



                      $$alphaalpha r+alpha ralpha r^2+alpha r^2alpha=frac caimplies alpha^2 r(1+r+r^2)=frac ca$$



                      $$alphaalpha ralpha r^2=-frac daimplies alpha^3 r^3=-frac da$$



                      So, $$frac{alpha^2 r(1+r+r^2)}{alpha(1+r+r^2)}=frac{frac ca}{-frac ba}implies alpha r=-frac cb text{ if }1+r+r^2ne0$$



                      Then, $$left(-frac cbright)^3=-frac daimplies b^3d=c^3a$$



                      If $1+r+r^2=0,$



                      $b=c=0$
                      and $r=frac{-1pmsqrt3}2$ i.e., r is a complex cube root of $1$



                      So, the equation reduces to $ax^3+d=0$ whose roots are $left(-frac daright)^frac13,left(-frac daright)^frac13r, left(-frac daright)^frac13r^2$.



                      So, we don't find any relationship among $a,b,c$ and $d$ here.





                      In the 2nd case, let us find the equation whose roots are $alpha+beta,beta+gamma, gamma+alpha$ using the Transformation of Equations.



                      If $y=alpha+beta=alpha+beta+gamma-gamma=-frac ba-gammaimplies gamma=-left(y+frac baright)$



                      As $gamma$ is a root of the given equation, $-aleft(y+frac baright)^3+bleft(y+frac baright)^2-cleft(y+frac baright)+d=0$



                      On simplification, $$ay^3+(cdots)y^2+(cdots)y^2+frac{bc-ad}a=0$$ whose roots are $alpha+beta,beta+gamma, gamma+alpha$



                      Using Vieta's Formulas again, $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(gamma+alpha)=frac{ad-bc}{a^2}$



                      If among $alpha,beta,gamma$ two have same absolute value but opposite sign, $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(gamma+alpha)=0implies ad=bc$ (the condition is necessary)



                      Sufficiency: Again, if $ad=bc,$ $frac ab=frac cd=t$(say,) so $a=bt,c=dt$



                      Then the equation becomes $$btx^3+bx^2+dtx+d=0implies bx^2(tx+1)+d(tx+1)=0$$



                      So, $$(tx+1)(bx^2+d)=0$$ One root is $-frac1t$ What about the others?






                      share|cite|improve this answer























                      • $x=sqrt{-d/b}$ which is not really $1/t$, the thing we need?
                        – bbr4in
                        Feb 1 '13 at 21:59










                      • @user52187, I left it for you to find the two roots other than $-frac1t=-frac ba=-frac dc$ to prove the proposition as it is after all a 'homework'.
                        – lab bhattacharjee
                        Feb 2 '13 at 3:27










                      • So is what I wrote incorrect?
                        – bbr4in
                        Feb 3 '13 at 22:09










                      • @user52187, no. You are right when you say $frac1tne pmsqrt{-frac db}$. But 'homework' is not supposed to be answered fully here as my last comment has pointed out.
                        – lab bhattacharjee
                        Feb 4 '13 at 3:29
















                      0












                      0








                      0






                      If $alpha, beta, gamma$ are the roots of $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$



                      Using Vieta's Formulas, $$alpha+beta+gamma=-frac ba, alphabeta+betagamma+gammaalpha=frac ca,alphabetagamma=-frac da$$



                      If $alpha,beta,gamma$ are in Geometric Progression, $fracbetaalpha=fracgammabeta$ is constant $=r$(say).
                      Clearly, $alpha rne 0$



                      $implies beta=alpha r, gamma=beta r=alpha r^2$



                      $$implies alpha+alpha r+alpha r^2=-frac baimplies alpha(1+r+r^2)=-frac ba$$



                      $$alphaalpha r+alpha ralpha r^2+alpha r^2alpha=frac caimplies alpha^2 r(1+r+r^2)=frac ca$$



                      $$alphaalpha ralpha r^2=-frac daimplies alpha^3 r^3=-frac da$$



                      So, $$frac{alpha^2 r(1+r+r^2)}{alpha(1+r+r^2)}=frac{frac ca}{-frac ba}implies alpha r=-frac cb text{ if }1+r+r^2ne0$$



                      Then, $$left(-frac cbright)^3=-frac daimplies b^3d=c^3a$$



                      If $1+r+r^2=0,$



                      $b=c=0$
                      and $r=frac{-1pmsqrt3}2$ i.e., r is a complex cube root of $1$



                      So, the equation reduces to $ax^3+d=0$ whose roots are $left(-frac daright)^frac13,left(-frac daright)^frac13r, left(-frac daright)^frac13r^2$.



                      So, we don't find any relationship among $a,b,c$ and $d$ here.





                      In the 2nd case, let us find the equation whose roots are $alpha+beta,beta+gamma, gamma+alpha$ using the Transformation of Equations.



                      If $y=alpha+beta=alpha+beta+gamma-gamma=-frac ba-gammaimplies gamma=-left(y+frac baright)$



                      As $gamma$ is a root of the given equation, $-aleft(y+frac baright)^3+bleft(y+frac baright)^2-cleft(y+frac baright)+d=0$



                      On simplification, $$ay^3+(cdots)y^2+(cdots)y^2+frac{bc-ad}a=0$$ whose roots are $alpha+beta,beta+gamma, gamma+alpha$



                      Using Vieta's Formulas again, $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(gamma+alpha)=frac{ad-bc}{a^2}$



                      If among $alpha,beta,gamma$ two have same absolute value but opposite sign, $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(gamma+alpha)=0implies ad=bc$ (the condition is necessary)



                      Sufficiency: Again, if $ad=bc,$ $frac ab=frac cd=t$(say,) so $a=bt,c=dt$



                      Then the equation becomes $$btx^3+bx^2+dtx+d=0implies bx^2(tx+1)+d(tx+1)=0$$



                      So, $$(tx+1)(bx^2+d)=0$$ One root is $-frac1t$ What about the others?






                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      If $alpha, beta, gamma$ are the roots of $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0$



                      Using Vieta's Formulas, $$alpha+beta+gamma=-frac ba, alphabeta+betagamma+gammaalpha=frac ca,alphabetagamma=-frac da$$



                      If $alpha,beta,gamma$ are in Geometric Progression, $fracbetaalpha=fracgammabeta$ is constant $=r$(say).
                      Clearly, $alpha rne 0$



                      $implies beta=alpha r, gamma=beta r=alpha r^2$



                      $$implies alpha+alpha r+alpha r^2=-frac baimplies alpha(1+r+r^2)=-frac ba$$



                      $$alphaalpha r+alpha ralpha r^2+alpha r^2alpha=frac caimplies alpha^2 r(1+r+r^2)=frac ca$$



                      $$alphaalpha ralpha r^2=-frac daimplies alpha^3 r^3=-frac da$$



                      So, $$frac{alpha^2 r(1+r+r^2)}{alpha(1+r+r^2)}=frac{frac ca}{-frac ba}implies alpha r=-frac cb text{ if }1+r+r^2ne0$$



                      Then, $$left(-frac cbright)^3=-frac daimplies b^3d=c^3a$$



                      If $1+r+r^2=0,$



                      $b=c=0$
                      and $r=frac{-1pmsqrt3}2$ i.e., r is a complex cube root of $1$



                      So, the equation reduces to $ax^3+d=0$ whose roots are $left(-frac daright)^frac13,left(-frac daright)^frac13r, left(-frac daright)^frac13r^2$.



                      So, we don't find any relationship among $a,b,c$ and $d$ here.





                      In the 2nd case, let us find the equation whose roots are $alpha+beta,beta+gamma, gamma+alpha$ using the Transformation of Equations.



                      If $y=alpha+beta=alpha+beta+gamma-gamma=-frac ba-gammaimplies gamma=-left(y+frac baright)$



                      As $gamma$ is a root of the given equation, $-aleft(y+frac baright)^3+bleft(y+frac baright)^2-cleft(y+frac baright)+d=0$



                      On simplification, $$ay^3+(cdots)y^2+(cdots)y^2+frac{bc-ad}a=0$$ whose roots are $alpha+beta,beta+gamma, gamma+alpha$



                      Using Vieta's Formulas again, $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(gamma+alpha)=frac{ad-bc}{a^2}$



                      If among $alpha,beta,gamma$ two have same absolute value but opposite sign, $(alpha+beta)(beta+gamma)(gamma+alpha)=0implies ad=bc$ (the condition is necessary)



                      Sufficiency: Again, if $ad=bc,$ $frac ab=frac cd=t$(say,) so $a=bt,c=dt$



                      Then the equation becomes $$btx^3+bx^2+dtx+d=0implies bx^2(tx+1)+d(tx+1)=0$$



                      So, $$(tx+1)(bx^2+d)=0$$ One root is $-frac1t$ What about the others?







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Feb 1 '13 at 18:31

























                      answered Feb 1 '13 at 18:17









                      lab bhattacharjeelab bhattacharjee

                      223k15156274




                      223k15156274












                      • $x=sqrt{-d/b}$ which is not really $1/t$, the thing we need?
                        – bbr4in
                        Feb 1 '13 at 21:59










                      • @user52187, I left it for you to find the two roots other than $-frac1t=-frac ba=-frac dc$ to prove the proposition as it is after all a 'homework'.
                        – lab bhattacharjee
                        Feb 2 '13 at 3:27










                      • So is what I wrote incorrect?
                        – bbr4in
                        Feb 3 '13 at 22:09










                      • @user52187, no. You are right when you say $frac1tne pmsqrt{-frac db}$. But 'homework' is not supposed to be answered fully here as my last comment has pointed out.
                        – lab bhattacharjee
                        Feb 4 '13 at 3:29




















                      • $x=sqrt{-d/b}$ which is not really $1/t$, the thing we need?
                        – bbr4in
                        Feb 1 '13 at 21:59










                      • @user52187, I left it for you to find the two roots other than $-frac1t=-frac ba=-frac dc$ to prove the proposition as it is after all a 'homework'.
                        – lab bhattacharjee
                        Feb 2 '13 at 3:27










                      • So is what I wrote incorrect?
                        – bbr4in
                        Feb 3 '13 at 22:09










                      • @user52187, no. You are right when you say $frac1tne pmsqrt{-frac db}$. But 'homework' is not supposed to be answered fully here as my last comment has pointed out.
                        – lab bhattacharjee
                        Feb 4 '13 at 3:29


















                      $x=sqrt{-d/b}$ which is not really $1/t$, the thing we need?
                      – bbr4in
                      Feb 1 '13 at 21:59




                      $x=sqrt{-d/b}$ which is not really $1/t$, the thing we need?
                      – bbr4in
                      Feb 1 '13 at 21:59












                      @user52187, I left it for you to find the two roots other than $-frac1t=-frac ba=-frac dc$ to prove the proposition as it is after all a 'homework'.
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      Feb 2 '13 at 3:27




                      @user52187, I left it for you to find the two roots other than $-frac1t=-frac ba=-frac dc$ to prove the proposition as it is after all a 'homework'.
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      Feb 2 '13 at 3:27












                      So is what I wrote incorrect?
                      – bbr4in
                      Feb 3 '13 at 22:09




                      So is what I wrote incorrect?
                      – bbr4in
                      Feb 3 '13 at 22:09












                      @user52187, no. You are right when you say $frac1tne pmsqrt{-frac db}$. But 'homework' is not supposed to be answered fully here as my last comment has pointed out.
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      Feb 4 '13 at 3:29






                      @user52187, no. You are right when you say $frac1tne pmsqrt{-frac db}$. But 'homework' is not supposed to be answered fully here as my last comment has pointed out.
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      Feb 4 '13 at 3:29













                      0














                      Suppose $a not = 0$ , let $p=frac{b}{a},q=frac{c}{a},r=frac{d}{a}$, then the equation is $$x^3+px^2+qx+r=0$$
                      Using Vieta's Formulas,$$alpha + beta + gamma=-p \ alpha beta + beta gamma + alpha gamma =q \ alpha beta gamma = -r$$Suppose $beta^2=alpha gamma$, we get $$q^3=p^3r$$that is $$left { begin{array}{l} ac^3=b^3d \ a not = 0 \ d not = 0 end{array} right.$$
                      Now we prove it is sufficient.
                      $$q^3-p^3r \ =(alpha beta + beta gamma + alpha gamma)^3-alpha beta gamma(alpha + beta + gamma) \ = alpha^3beta^3+alpha^3gamma^3+beta^3gamma^3-alpha beta gamma(alpha^3+beta^3+gamma^3) \ = (alpha^2-beta gamma)(beta^2-alpha gamma)(gamma^2-alpha beta) \=0$$
                      So the roots are in geometric progression.






                      share|cite|improve this answer


























                        0














                        Suppose $a not = 0$ , let $p=frac{b}{a},q=frac{c}{a},r=frac{d}{a}$, then the equation is $$x^3+px^2+qx+r=0$$
                        Using Vieta's Formulas,$$alpha + beta + gamma=-p \ alpha beta + beta gamma + alpha gamma =q \ alpha beta gamma = -r$$Suppose $beta^2=alpha gamma$, we get $$q^3=p^3r$$that is $$left { begin{array}{l} ac^3=b^3d \ a not = 0 \ d not = 0 end{array} right.$$
                        Now we prove it is sufficient.
                        $$q^3-p^3r \ =(alpha beta + beta gamma + alpha gamma)^3-alpha beta gamma(alpha + beta + gamma) \ = alpha^3beta^3+alpha^3gamma^3+beta^3gamma^3-alpha beta gamma(alpha^3+beta^3+gamma^3) \ = (alpha^2-beta gamma)(beta^2-alpha gamma)(gamma^2-alpha beta) \=0$$
                        So the roots are in geometric progression.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          0












                          0








                          0






                          Suppose $a not = 0$ , let $p=frac{b}{a},q=frac{c}{a},r=frac{d}{a}$, then the equation is $$x^3+px^2+qx+r=0$$
                          Using Vieta's Formulas,$$alpha + beta + gamma=-p \ alpha beta + beta gamma + alpha gamma =q \ alpha beta gamma = -r$$Suppose $beta^2=alpha gamma$, we get $$q^3=p^3r$$that is $$left { begin{array}{l} ac^3=b^3d \ a not = 0 \ d not = 0 end{array} right.$$
                          Now we prove it is sufficient.
                          $$q^3-p^3r \ =(alpha beta + beta gamma + alpha gamma)^3-alpha beta gamma(alpha + beta + gamma) \ = alpha^3beta^3+alpha^3gamma^3+beta^3gamma^3-alpha beta gamma(alpha^3+beta^3+gamma^3) \ = (alpha^2-beta gamma)(beta^2-alpha gamma)(gamma^2-alpha beta) \=0$$
                          So the roots are in geometric progression.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Suppose $a not = 0$ , let $p=frac{b}{a},q=frac{c}{a},r=frac{d}{a}$, then the equation is $$x^3+px^2+qx+r=0$$
                          Using Vieta's Formulas,$$alpha + beta + gamma=-p \ alpha beta + beta gamma + alpha gamma =q \ alpha beta gamma = -r$$Suppose $beta^2=alpha gamma$, we get $$q^3=p^3r$$that is $$left { begin{array}{l} ac^3=b^3d \ a not = 0 \ d not = 0 end{array} right.$$
                          Now we prove it is sufficient.
                          $$q^3-p^3r \ =(alpha beta + beta gamma + alpha gamma)^3-alpha beta gamma(alpha + beta + gamma) \ = alpha^3beta^3+alpha^3gamma^3+beta^3gamma^3-alpha beta gamma(alpha^3+beta^3+gamma^3) \ = (alpha^2-beta gamma)(beta^2-alpha gamma)(gamma^2-alpha beta) \=0$$
                          So the roots are in geometric progression.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jun 24 '18 at 16:26









                          TA123TA123

                          958




                          958






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f292159%2froots-of-polynomial-equation-in-geometric-progression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              1300-talet

                              1300-talet

                              Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8