Equivalence of injectivity of a lineal operator $T$ between two Banach spaces and and existence of another...












0














Given $X$ and $Y$ two Banach spaces and $T in L(X,Y)$, where $L(X,Y)$ is the set of all the linear operators of $X$ in $Y$, show that the following sentences are equivalent:



a) There exists $S in L(X,Y)$ such that $S(T(x))=x , , forall x in X$.



b) $T$ is injective and $T(X)$ is a complemented space of $Y$.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    What where your attempts in proving this?
    – James
    yesterday
















0














Given $X$ and $Y$ two Banach spaces and $T in L(X,Y)$, where $L(X,Y)$ is the set of all the linear operators of $X$ in $Y$, show that the following sentences are equivalent:



a) There exists $S in L(X,Y)$ such that $S(T(x))=x , , forall x in X$.



b) $T$ is injective and $T(X)$ is a complemented space of $Y$.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    What where your attempts in proving this?
    – James
    yesterday














0












0








0


1





Given $X$ and $Y$ two Banach spaces and $T in L(X,Y)$, where $L(X,Y)$ is the set of all the linear operators of $X$ in $Y$, show that the following sentences are equivalent:



a) There exists $S in L(X,Y)$ such that $S(T(x))=x , , forall x in X$.



b) $T$ is injective and $T(X)$ is a complemented space of $Y$.










share|cite|improve this question













Given $X$ and $Y$ two Banach spaces and $T in L(X,Y)$, where $L(X,Y)$ is the set of all the linear operators of $X$ in $Y$, show that the following sentences are equivalent:



a) There exists $S in L(X,Y)$ such that $S(T(x))=x , , forall x in X$.



b) $T$ is injective and $T(X)$ is a complemented space of $Y$.







functional-analysis linear-transformations banach-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked yesterday









Maggie94

854




854








  • 1




    What where your attempts in proving this?
    – James
    yesterday














  • 1




    What where your attempts in proving this?
    – James
    yesterday








1




1




What where your attempts in proving this?
– James
yesterday




What where your attempts in proving this?
– James
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Your $S$ should be a linear operator on $Y$, otherwise the composition makes no sense. The direction a) to b) is simple, just work with the definition of an injective map -- you don't need anything else. If you can't manage, I will add a proof here but at least try to solve it yourself.



For b) implies a), let ${x_imid iin I}$ be a basis for $X$. By infectivity of $T$, ${T(x_i)mid iin I}$ forms a basis of the image of $T$ -- convince yourself that this is true and let me know if you can't. Now define $$S:Yto X, smapstobegin{cases}T^{-1}(s),& if;sinmathrm{img}(T),\ 0,&else.end{cases}$$ You can then check by writing $s=sum alpha_ix_i$ that $S$ is as you want it to. Can you fill the missing details yourself?






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060417%2fequivalence-of-injectivity-of-a-lineal-operator-t-between-two-banach-spaces-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Your $S$ should be a linear operator on $Y$, otherwise the composition makes no sense. The direction a) to b) is simple, just work with the definition of an injective map -- you don't need anything else. If you can't manage, I will add a proof here but at least try to solve it yourself.



    For b) implies a), let ${x_imid iin I}$ be a basis for $X$. By infectivity of $T$, ${T(x_i)mid iin I}$ forms a basis of the image of $T$ -- convince yourself that this is true and let me know if you can't. Now define $$S:Yto X, smapstobegin{cases}T^{-1}(s),& if;sinmathrm{img}(T),\ 0,&else.end{cases}$$ You can then check by writing $s=sum alpha_ix_i$ that $S$ is as you want it to. Can you fill the missing details yourself?






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      Your $S$ should be a linear operator on $Y$, otherwise the composition makes no sense. The direction a) to b) is simple, just work with the definition of an injective map -- you don't need anything else. If you can't manage, I will add a proof here but at least try to solve it yourself.



      For b) implies a), let ${x_imid iin I}$ be a basis for $X$. By infectivity of $T$, ${T(x_i)mid iin I}$ forms a basis of the image of $T$ -- convince yourself that this is true and let me know if you can't. Now define $$S:Yto X, smapstobegin{cases}T^{-1}(s),& if;sinmathrm{img}(T),\ 0,&else.end{cases}$$ You can then check by writing $s=sum alpha_ix_i$ that $S$ is as you want it to. Can you fill the missing details yourself?






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        Your $S$ should be a linear operator on $Y$, otherwise the composition makes no sense. The direction a) to b) is simple, just work with the definition of an injective map -- you don't need anything else. If you can't manage, I will add a proof here but at least try to solve it yourself.



        For b) implies a), let ${x_imid iin I}$ be a basis for $X$. By infectivity of $T$, ${T(x_i)mid iin I}$ forms a basis of the image of $T$ -- convince yourself that this is true and let me know if you can't. Now define $$S:Yto X, smapstobegin{cases}T^{-1}(s),& if;sinmathrm{img}(T),\ 0,&else.end{cases}$$ You can then check by writing $s=sum alpha_ix_i$ that $S$ is as you want it to. Can you fill the missing details yourself?






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Your $S$ should be a linear operator on $Y$, otherwise the composition makes no sense. The direction a) to b) is simple, just work with the definition of an injective map -- you don't need anything else. If you can't manage, I will add a proof here but at least try to solve it yourself.



        For b) implies a), let ${x_imid iin I}$ be a basis for $X$. By infectivity of $T$, ${T(x_i)mid iin I}$ forms a basis of the image of $T$ -- convince yourself that this is true and let me know if you can't. Now define $$S:Yto X, smapstobegin{cases}T^{-1}(s),& if;sinmathrm{img}(T),\ 0,&else.end{cases}$$ You can then check by writing $s=sum alpha_ix_i$ that $S$ is as you want it to. Can you fill the missing details yourself?







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        James

        703115




        703115






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060417%2fequivalence-of-injectivity-of-a-lineal-operator-t-between-two-banach-spaces-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            An IMO inspired problem

            Management

            Investment