Why $mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$?












6












$begingroup$


Let $lambda(n) = lambda(mathbb{Z}_n^*)$ be the Carmichael function and $phi(n) = | mathbb{Z}_{n}^{*} |$ be the Euler function. I need to show:



$$mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$$



Some facts I know (maybe not relevant)




  1. $lambda(n)|phi(n)$.


  2. Any finite abelian group $G$ contains a cyclic subgroup of order $lambda(G)$.


  3. Any two finite cyclic groups of the same order are isomorphic.



But why should $mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$ one be a subgroup of the other? This was stated in one course on cryptography but I cannot find a good justification for it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 6 at 23:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 6 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 9:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    @Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:22
















6












$begingroup$


Let $lambda(n) = lambda(mathbb{Z}_n^*)$ be the Carmichael function and $phi(n) = | mathbb{Z}_{n}^{*} |$ be the Euler function. I need to show:



$$mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$$



Some facts I know (maybe not relevant)




  1. $lambda(n)|phi(n)$.


  2. Any finite abelian group $G$ contains a cyclic subgroup of order $lambda(G)$.


  3. Any two finite cyclic groups of the same order are isomorphic.



But why should $mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$ one be a subgroup of the other? This was stated in one course on cryptography but I cannot find a good justification for it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 6 at 23:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 6 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 9:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    @Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:22














6












6








6





$begingroup$


Let $lambda(n) = lambda(mathbb{Z}_n^*)$ be the Carmichael function and $phi(n) = | mathbb{Z}_{n}^{*} |$ be the Euler function. I need to show:



$$mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$$



Some facts I know (maybe not relevant)




  1. $lambda(n)|phi(n)$.


  2. Any finite abelian group $G$ contains a cyclic subgroup of order $lambda(G)$.


  3. Any two finite cyclic groups of the same order are isomorphic.



But why should $mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$ one be a subgroup of the other? This was stated in one course on cryptography but I cannot find a good justification for it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $lambda(n) = lambda(mathbb{Z}_n^*)$ be the Carmichael function and $phi(n) = | mathbb{Z}_{n}^{*} |$ be the Euler function. I need to show:



$$mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$$



Some facts I know (maybe not relevant)




  1. $lambda(n)|phi(n)$.


  2. Any finite abelian group $G$ contains a cyclic subgroup of order $lambda(G)$.


  3. Any two finite cyclic groups of the same order are isomorphic.



But why should $mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$ one be a subgroup of the other? This was stated in one course on cryptography but I cannot find a good justification for it.







abstract-algebra group-theory number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 23:16







Javier

















asked Jan 6 at 22:55









JavierJavier

2,01621133




2,01621133












  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 6 at 23:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 6 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 9:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    @Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:22


















  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 6 at 23:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 6 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 9:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    @Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:22
















$begingroup$
If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 6 at 23:05






$begingroup$
If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 6 at 23:05






2




2




$begingroup$
We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 6 at 23:07




$begingroup$
We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 6 at 23:07












$begingroup$
I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 7 at 9:03




$begingroup$
I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 7 at 9:03












$begingroup$
@DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 7 at 23:17




$begingroup$
@DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 7 at 23:17












$begingroup$
@Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 7 at 23:22




$begingroup$
@Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 7 at 23:22










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064491%2fwhy-mathbbz-lambdan-le-mathbbz-phin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064491%2fwhy-mathbbz-lambdan-le-mathbbz-phin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

1300-talet

1300-talet

Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8