Mapping a curve-sided quadrilateral to a rectangle
I am currently investigating different ways of solving the Laplace equation
$$frac{partial^2 F}{partial x^2} + frac{partial^2 F}{partial z^2} = 0 $$
numerically on the domain $Omega$ shown as the shaded region in the figure below. As the figure shows, $Omega$ is bounded by the vertical lines $x = 0$, $x = L$, the horizontal line $z = -h$ and the curve $(x, eta(x))$ where $eta(x)$ is a smooth, $L$-periodic function.
One strategy for solving the Laplace equation is to make a coordinate transformation $(x,z) mapsto (r(x,z), s(x,z))$ and then solve the equation that the function $G(r(x,z), s(x,z)) = F(x,z)$ satisfies on the transformed domain. For this strategy to be practical, the coordinate transformation should map $Omega$ to a rectangle.
Now, my questions (which is probably more of a request) is the following: Which coordinate tranformations from $Omega$ to a rectangle exist?
I am aware of the simple vertical stretching $(x,z) mapsto (x, s(x,z))$ where
$$ s(x,z) = frac{2z + h - eta(x)}{h + eta(x)}$$
and in principal it works fine. In the mapped coordinates the function $G(x,s(x,z)) = F(x,z)$ solves the equation
$$ frac{partial^2 G}{partial x^2} + bigg( bigg[frac{partial s}{partial x} bigg]^2 + bigg[ frac{partial s}{partial z} bigg]^2 bigg) frac{partial^2 G}{partial s^2} + 2 frac{partial s}{partial x} frac{partial^2 G}{partial x partial s} + frac{partial^2 s}{partial x^2} frac{partial G}{partial s} = 0, qquad 0 leq x leq L, , , , -1 leq s leq 1$$
and while this certainly can be solved numerically, it would be nice to have a coordinate transformation which does not give rise to such a complicated equation. The ideal transformation would of course be a conformal one, since the Laplace equation is invariant under such a change of coordinates.
differential-geometry pde harmonic-functions conformal-geometry
add a comment |
I am currently investigating different ways of solving the Laplace equation
$$frac{partial^2 F}{partial x^2} + frac{partial^2 F}{partial z^2} = 0 $$
numerically on the domain $Omega$ shown as the shaded region in the figure below. As the figure shows, $Omega$ is bounded by the vertical lines $x = 0$, $x = L$, the horizontal line $z = -h$ and the curve $(x, eta(x))$ where $eta(x)$ is a smooth, $L$-periodic function.
One strategy for solving the Laplace equation is to make a coordinate transformation $(x,z) mapsto (r(x,z), s(x,z))$ and then solve the equation that the function $G(r(x,z), s(x,z)) = F(x,z)$ satisfies on the transformed domain. For this strategy to be practical, the coordinate transformation should map $Omega$ to a rectangle.
Now, my questions (which is probably more of a request) is the following: Which coordinate tranformations from $Omega$ to a rectangle exist?
I am aware of the simple vertical stretching $(x,z) mapsto (x, s(x,z))$ where
$$ s(x,z) = frac{2z + h - eta(x)}{h + eta(x)}$$
and in principal it works fine. In the mapped coordinates the function $G(x,s(x,z)) = F(x,z)$ solves the equation
$$ frac{partial^2 G}{partial x^2} + bigg( bigg[frac{partial s}{partial x} bigg]^2 + bigg[ frac{partial s}{partial z} bigg]^2 bigg) frac{partial^2 G}{partial s^2} + 2 frac{partial s}{partial x} frac{partial^2 G}{partial x partial s} + frac{partial^2 s}{partial x^2} frac{partial G}{partial s} = 0, qquad 0 leq x leq L, , , , -1 leq s leq 1$$
and while this certainly can be solved numerically, it would be nice to have a coordinate transformation which does not give rise to such a complicated equation. The ideal transformation would of course be a conformal one, since the Laplace equation is invariant under such a change of coordinates.
differential-geometry pde harmonic-functions conformal-geometry
add a comment |
I am currently investigating different ways of solving the Laplace equation
$$frac{partial^2 F}{partial x^2} + frac{partial^2 F}{partial z^2} = 0 $$
numerically on the domain $Omega$ shown as the shaded region in the figure below. As the figure shows, $Omega$ is bounded by the vertical lines $x = 0$, $x = L$, the horizontal line $z = -h$ and the curve $(x, eta(x))$ where $eta(x)$ is a smooth, $L$-periodic function.
One strategy for solving the Laplace equation is to make a coordinate transformation $(x,z) mapsto (r(x,z), s(x,z))$ and then solve the equation that the function $G(r(x,z), s(x,z)) = F(x,z)$ satisfies on the transformed domain. For this strategy to be practical, the coordinate transformation should map $Omega$ to a rectangle.
Now, my questions (which is probably more of a request) is the following: Which coordinate tranformations from $Omega$ to a rectangle exist?
I am aware of the simple vertical stretching $(x,z) mapsto (x, s(x,z))$ where
$$ s(x,z) = frac{2z + h - eta(x)}{h + eta(x)}$$
and in principal it works fine. In the mapped coordinates the function $G(x,s(x,z)) = F(x,z)$ solves the equation
$$ frac{partial^2 G}{partial x^2} + bigg( bigg[frac{partial s}{partial x} bigg]^2 + bigg[ frac{partial s}{partial z} bigg]^2 bigg) frac{partial^2 G}{partial s^2} + 2 frac{partial s}{partial x} frac{partial^2 G}{partial x partial s} + frac{partial^2 s}{partial x^2} frac{partial G}{partial s} = 0, qquad 0 leq x leq L, , , , -1 leq s leq 1$$
and while this certainly can be solved numerically, it would be nice to have a coordinate transformation which does not give rise to such a complicated equation. The ideal transformation would of course be a conformal one, since the Laplace equation is invariant under such a change of coordinates.
differential-geometry pde harmonic-functions conformal-geometry
I am currently investigating different ways of solving the Laplace equation
$$frac{partial^2 F}{partial x^2} + frac{partial^2 F}{partial z^2} = 0 $$
numerically on the domain $Omega$ shown as the shaded region in the figure below. As the figure shows, $Omega$ is bounded by the vertical lines $x = 0$, $x = L$, the horizontal line $z = -h$ and the curve $(x, eta(x))$ where $eta(x)$ is a smooth, $L$-periodic function.
One strategy for solving the Laplace equation is to make a coordinate transformation $(x,z) mapsto (r(x,z), s(x,z))$ and then solve the equation that the function $G(r(x,z), s(x,z)) = F(x,z)$ satisfies on the transformed domain. For this strategy to be practical, the coordinate transformation should map $Omega$ to a rectangle.
Now, my questions (which is probably more of a request) is the following: Which coordinate tranformations from $Omega$ to a rectangle exist?
I am aware of the simple vertical stretching $(x,z) mapsto (x, s(x,z))$ where
$$ s(x,z) = frac{2z + h - eta(x)}{h + eta(x)}$$
and in principal it works fine. In the mapped coordinates the function $G(x,s(x,z)) = F(x,z)$ solves the equation
$$ frac{partial^2 G}{partial x^2} + bigg( bigg[frac{partial s}{partial x} bigg]^2 + bigg[ frac{partial s}{partial z} bigg]^2 bigg) frac{partial^2 G}{partial s^2} + 2 frac{partial s}{partial x} frac{partial^2 G}{partial x partial s} + frac{partial^2 s}{partial x^2} frac{partial G}{partial s} = 0, qquad 0 leq x leq L, , , , -1 leq s leq 1$$
and while this certainly can be solved numerically, it would be nice to have a coordinate transformation which does not give rise to such a complicated equation. The ideal transformation would of course be a conformal one, since the Laplace equation is invariant under such a change of coordinates.
differential-geometry pde harmonic-functions conformal-geometry
differential-geometry pde harmonic-functions conformal-geometry
asked yesterday
Mathias Klahn
362
362
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060535%2fmapping-a-curve-sided-quadrilateral-to-a-rectangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060535%2fmapping-a-curve-sided-quadrilateral-to-a-rectangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown