Determine the AV of 13 annual deposits of $1,429 one year after the last deposit, at 2.10% effective
I got confused when calculating AV in this question.
Apparently the correct formula would be $1,429cdot 1.021 cdot frac{1.021^{13} - 1}{1.021 - 1}$. Or at least, this equals $21.511.03, which is supposed to be the correct answer. But when I was thinking of geometric series, don't we have $AV = 1,429 cdot 1.021 cdot (1 + 1.021 + ... + 1.021^{13}) = 1,429cdot 1.021 frac{1.021^{14} - 1}{1.021 - 1}$.
I just can't figure out why the formula with 14 is wrong. Any help would much be appreciated! Thank you :)
finance actuarial-science
add a comment |
I got confused when calculating AV in this question.
Apparently the correct formula would be $1,429cdot 1.021 cdot frac{1.021^{13} - 1}{1.021 - 1}$. Or at least, this equals $21.511.03, which is supposed to be the correct answer. But when I was thinking of geometric series, don't we have $AV = 1,429 cdot 1.021 cdot (1 + 1.021 + ... + 1.021^{13}) = 1,429cdot 1.021 frac{1.021^{14} - 1}{1.021 - 1}$.
I just can't figure out why the formula with 14 is wrong. Any help would much be appreciated! Thank you :)
finance actuarial-science
add a comment |
I got confused when calculating AV in this question.
Apparently the correct formula would be $1,429cdot 1.021 cdot frac{1.021^{13} - 1}{1.021 - 1}$. Or at least, this equals $21.511.03, which is supposed to be the correct answer. But when I was thinking of geometric series, don't we have $AV = 1,429 cdot 1.021 cdot (1 + 1.021 + ... + 1.021^{13}) = 1,429cdot 1.021 frac{1.021^{14} - 1}{1.021 - 1}$.
I just can't figure out why the formula with 14 is wrong. Any help would much be appreciated! Thank you :)
finance actuarial-science
I got confused when calculating AV in this question.
Apparently the correct formula would be $1,429cdot 1.021 cdot frac{1.021^{13} - 1}{1.021 - 1}$. Or at least, this equals $21.511.03, which is supposed to be the correct answer. But when I was thinking of geometric series, don't we have $AV = 1,429 cdot 1.021 cdot (1 + 1.021 + ... + 1.021^{13}) = 1,429cdot 1.021 frac{1.021^{14} - 1}{1.021 - 1}$.
I just can't figure out why the formula with 14 is wrong. Any help would much be appreciated! Thank you :)
finance actuarial-science
finance actuarial-science
asked Jan 4 at 2:04
quietkidquietkid
254
254
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There are only $13$ deposits. Your sum clearly contains $14$ terms, which is why it cannot be correct.
When we write the cash flow for the accumulated value, the final ($13^{rm th}$) deposit has had $1$ year to accumulate value. This much should be obvious. Then the $12^{rm th}$ deposit has had $2$ years, and so forth, so that the first deposit has had $13$ years to accumulate value. Consequently, the accumulated value of this first payment must be $1429(1.021)^{13}$. So not only do you have an extra deposit, you also have an extra year of interest accrued. The correct cash flow written out is
$$1429 left( (1.021)^{13} + (1.021)^{12} + cdots + (1.021)^2 + (1.021) right).$$ After factoring out the common factor of $1.021$, and applying the formula for the sum of a geometric series, we get the claimed answer.
Okay! Thank you :) that makes sense
– quietkid
Jan 4 at 3:02
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061239%2fdetermine-the-av-of-13-annual-deposits-of-1-429-one-year-after-the-last-deposit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are only $13$ deposits. Your sum clearly contains $14$ terms, which is why it cannot be correct.
When we write the cash flow for the accumulated value, the final ($13^{rm th}$) deposit has had $1$ year to accumulate value. This much should be obvious. Then the $12^{rm th}$ deposit has had $2$ years, and so forth, so that the first deposit has had $13$ years to accumulate value. Consequently, the accumulated value of this first payment must be $1429(1.021)^{13}$. So not only do you have an extra deposit, you also have an extra year of interest accrued. The correct cash flow written out is
$$1429 left( (1.021)^{13} + (1.021)^{12} + cdots + (1.021)^2 + (1.021) right).$$ After factoring out the common factor of $1.021$, and applying the formula for the sum of a geometric series, we get the claimed answer.
Okay! Thank you :) that makes sense
– quietkid
Jan 4 at 3:02
add a comment |
There are only $13$ deposits. Your sum clearly contains $14$ terms, which is why it cannot be correct.
When we write the cash flow for the accumulated value, the final ($13^{rm th}$) deposit has had $1$ year to accumulate value. This much should be obvious. Then the $12^{rm th}$ deposit has had $2$ years, and so forth, so that the first deposit has had $13$ years to accumulate value. Consequently, the accumulated value of this first payment must be $1429(1.021)^{13}$. So not only do you have an extra deposit, you also have an extra year of interest accrued. The correct cash flow written out is
$$1429 left( (1.021)^{13} + (1.021)^{12} + cdots + (1.021)^2 + (1.021) right).$$ After factoring out the common factor of $1.021$, and applying the formula for the sum of a geometric series, we get the claimed answer.
Okay! Thank you :) that makes sense
– quietkid
Jan 4 at 3:02
add a comment |
There are only $13$ deposits. Your sum clearly contains $14$ terms, which is why it cannot be correct.
When we write the cash flow for the accumulated value, the final ($13^{rm th}$) deposit has had $1$ year to accumulate value. This much should be obvious. Then the $12^{rm th}$ deposit has had $2$ years, and so forth, so that the first deposit has had $13$ years to accumulate value. Consequently, the accumulated value of this first payment must be $1429(1.021)^{13}$. So not only do you have an extra deposit, you also have an extra year of interest accrued. The correct cash flow written out is
$$1429 left( (1.021)^{13} + (1.021)^{12} + cdots + (1.021)^2 + (1.021) right).$$ After factoring out the common factor of $1.021$, and applying the formula for the sum of a geometric series, we get the claimed answer.
There are only $13$ deposits. Your sum clearly contains $14$ terms, which is why it cannot be correct.
When we write the cash flow for the accumulated value, the final ($13^{rm th}$) deposit has had $1$ year to accumulate value. This much should be obvious. Then the $12^{rm th}$ deposit has had $2$ years, and so forth, so that the first deposit has had $13$ years to accumulate value. Consequently, the accumulated value of this first payment must be $1429(1.021)^{13}$. So not only do you have an extra deposit, you also have an extra year of interest accrued. The correct cash flow written out is
$$1429 left( (1.021)^{13} + (1.021)^{12} + cdots + (1.021)^2 + (1.021) right).$$ After factoring out the common factor of $1.021$, and applying the formula for the sum of a geometric series, we get the claimed answer.
answered Jan 4 at 2:09
heropupheropup
62.6k66099
62.6k66099
Okay! Thank you :) that makes sense
– quietkid
Jan 4 at 3:02
add a comment |
Okay! Thank you :) that makes sense
– quietkid
Jan 4 at 3:02
Okay! Thank you :) that makes sense
– quietkid
Jan 4 at 3:02
Okay! Thank you :) that makes sense
– quietkid
Jan 4 at 3:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061239%2fdetermine-the-av-of-13-annual-deposits-of-1-429-one-year-after-the-last-deposit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown