Lebesgue measure is zero for a set
In Pollicott and Simon Paper "The Hausdorff dimension of $ lambda-$ expansions with deleted digits https://www.jstor.org/stable/2154881?seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents he mention that for $ lambda in [1/n,1/l] $, Lebesgue measure of $ Lambda (lambda) $ is zero.
I used Proposition 2 from Keane, Smorodisky and Solomyak paper https://www.jstor.org/stable/2154880?seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents, for $ lambda < 1/l quad $ is straight forward but for $ lambda = 1/l $, we required that $ l in S $ and that is not mention anywhere in Pollicott and Simon paper.
lebesgue-measure number-systems
edited Jan 4 at 6:17
max_zorn
3,29361328
asked Jan 4 at 5:19
Uswadkar Prashant VasantraoUswadkar Prashant Vasantrao
506
add a comment |
In Pollicott and Simon Paper "The Hausdorff dimension of $ lambda-$ expansions with deleted digits https://www.jstor.org/stable/2154881?seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents he mention that for $ lambda in [1/n,1/l] $, Lebesgue measure of $ Lambda (lambda) $ is zero.
I used Proposition 2 from Keane, Smorodisky and Solomyak paper https://www.jstor.org/stable/2154880?seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents, for $ lambda < 1/l quad $ is straight forward but for $ lambda = 1/l $, we required that $ l in S $ and that is not mention anywhere in Pollicott and Simon paper.
lebesgue-measure number-systems
edited Jan 4 at 6:17
max_zorn
3,29361328
asked Jan 4 at 5:19
Uswadkar Prashant VasantraoUswadkar Prashant Vasantrao
506
add a comment |
In Pollicott and Simon Paper "The Hausdorff dimension of $ lambda-$ expansions with deleted digits https://www.jstor.org/stable/2154881?seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents he mention that for $ lambda in [1/n,1/l] $, Lebesgue measure of $ Lambda (lambda) $ is zero.
I used Proposition 2 from Keane, Smorodisky and Solomyak paper https://www.jstor.org/stable/2154880?seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents, for $ lambda < 1/l quad $ is straight forward but for $ lambda = 1/l $, we required that $ l in S $ and that is not mention anywhere in Pollicott and Simon paper.
lebesgue-measure number-systems
edited Jan 4 at 6:17
max_zorn
3,29361328
asked Jan 4 at 5:19
Uswadkar Prashant VasantraoUswadkar Prashant Vasantrao
506
In Pollicott and Simon Paper "The Hausdorff dimension of $ lambda-$ expansions with deleted digits https://www.jstor.org/stable/2154881?seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents he mention that for $ lambda in [1/n,1/l] $, Lebesgue measure of $ Lambda (lambda) $ is zero.
I used Proposition 2 from Keane, Smorodisky and Solomyak paper https://www.jstor.org/stable/2154880?seq=2#metadata_info_tab_contents, for $ lambda < 1/l quad $ is straight forward but for $ lambda = 1/l $, we required that $ l in S $ and that is not mention anywhere in Pollicott and Simon paper.
lebesgue-measure number-systems
lebesgue-measure number-systems
edited Jan 4 at 6:17
max_zorn
3,29361328
asked Jan 4 at 5:19
Uswadkar Prashant VasantraoUswadkar Prashant Vasantrao
506
edited Jan 4 at 6:17
max_zorn
3,29361328
asked Jan 4 at 5:19
Uswadkar Prashant VasantraoUswadkar Prashant Vasantrao
506
edited Jan 4 at 6:17
max_zorn
3,29361328
edited Jan 4 at 6:17
max_zorn
3,29361328
edited Jan 4 at 6:17
max_zorn
3,29361328
3,29361328
asked Jan 4 at 5:19
Uswadkar Prashant VasantraoUswadkar Prashant Vasantrao
506
asked Jan 4 at 5:19
Uswadkar Prashant VasantraoUswadkar Prashant Vasantrao
506
asked Jan 4 at 5:19
Uswadkar Prashant VasantraoUswadkar Prashant Vasantrao
506
506
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061336%2flebesgue-measure-is-zero-for-a-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061336%2flebesgue-measure-is-zero-for-a-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
