Showing a set of subspaces are subspaces of a homomorphism?












1














another question from a problem set that I am struggling to answer. Any guidance or help would be appreciated. I don't even really understand what the question is asking.





Let $V$ be a nonzero vector space and let $T in text{Hom}(V, V )$. Show that ${S in Hom(V, V ) : S circ T = T circ S }$ is a subspace of $ text{Hom}(V, V )$.










share|cite|improve this question





























    1














    another question from a problem set that I am struggling to answer. Any guidance or help would be appreciated. I don't even really understand what the question is asking.





    Let $V$ be a nonzero vector space and let $T in text{Hom}(V, V )$. Show that ${S in Hom(V, V ) : S circ T = T circ S }$ is a subspace of $ text{Hom}(V, V )$.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1







      another question from a problem set that I am struggling to answer. Any guidance or help would be appreciated. I don't even really understand what the question is asking.





      Let $V$ be a nonzero vector space and let $T in text{Hom}(V, V )$. Show that ${S in Hom(V, V ) : S circ T = T circ S }$ is a subspace of $ text{Hom}(V, V )$.










      share|cite|improve this question















      another question from a problem set that I am struggling to answer. Any guidance or help would be appreciated. I don't even really understand what the question is asking.





      Let $V$ be a nonzero vector space and let $T in text{Hom}(V, V )$. Show that ${S in Hom(V, V ) : S circ T = T circ S }$ is a subspace of $ text{Hom}(V, V )$.







      linear-algebra vector-spaces proof-writing dual-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 4 at 5:54









      André 3000

      12.5k22042




      12.5k22042










      asked Jun 5 '17 at 11:55









      Vivek KatialVivek Katial

      113




      113






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Let us call the given set K. You will be done if you can show the following two steps:




          1. If $S_1,S_2 in K$, then $S_1 + S_2 in K$.


          2. If $S in K$, then $kS in K$ for all $k$.



          To show the first, note that $(S_1+S_2) circ T = S_1 circ T + S_2 circ T = T circ S_1 + T circ S_2 = T circ (S_1 + S_2)$.



          The second simply follows: $(kS) circ T = k(S circ T) = k(T circ S) = T circ (kS)$.



          You can verify these steps yourself, but do ask if doubts persist. The above two steps show that $K$ is closed under addition, and scalar multiplication respectively, so $K$ is a subspace of $operatorname{Hom} (V,V)$.



          ADDENDUM : I should mention, thanks to the comment below, that $K$ is non-empty , since $T$ commutes with itself, hence is in $K$. (The identity map is in $K$ as well, as is the zero map!)






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Strictly speaking, the two conditions are not sufficient for $K$ to be a subspace. With only these conditions, it might happen that $K=emptyset$. Fortunately, $Tin K$
            – Hagen von Eitzen
            Jun 5 '17 at 12:04












          • @HagenvonEitzen Yes, thank you for pointing this out.
            – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
            Jun 5 '17 at 12:06











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2310593%2fshowing-a-set-of-subspaces-are-subspaces-of-a-homomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Let us call the given set K. You will be done if you can show the following two steps:




          1. If $S_1,S_2 in K$, then $S_1 + S_2 in K$.


          2. If $S in K$, then $kS in K$ for all $k$.



          To show the first, note that $(S_1+S_2) circ T = S_1 circ T + S_2 circ T = T circ S_1 + T circ S_2 = T circ (S_1 + S_2)$.



          The second simply follows: $(kS) circ T = k(S circ T) = k(T circ S) = T circ (kS)$.



          You can verify these steps yourself, but do ask if doubts persist. The above two steps show that $K$ is closed under addition, and scalar multiplication respectively, so $K$ is a subspace of $operatorname{Hom} (V,V)$.



          ADDENDUM : I should mention, thanks to the comment below, that $K$ is non-empty , since $T$ commutes with itself, hence is in $K$. (The identity map is in $K$ as well, as is the zero map!)






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Strictly speaking, the two conditions are not sufficient for $K$ to be a subspace. With only these conditions, it might happen that $K=emptyset$. Fortunately, $Tin K$
            – Hagen von Eitzen
            Jun 5 '17 at 12:04












          • @HagenvonEitzen Yes, thank you for pointing this out.
            – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
            Jun 5 '17 at 12:06
















          1














          Let us call the given set K. You will be done if you can show the following two steps:




          1. If $S_1,S_2 in K$, then $S_1 + S_2 in K$.


          2. If $S in K$, then $kS in K$ for all $k$.



          To show the first, note that $(S_1+S_2) circ T = S_1 circ T + S_2 circ T = T circ S_1 + T circ S_2 = T circ (S_1 + S_2)$.



          The second simply follows: $(kS) circ T = k(S circ T) = k(T circ S) = T circ (kS)$.



          You can verify these steps yourself, but do ask if doubts persist. The above two steps show that $K$ is closed under addition, and scalar multiplication respectively, so $K$ is a subspace of $operatorname{Hom} (V,V)$.



          ADDENDUM : I should mention, thanks to the comment below, that $K$ is non-empty , since $T$ commutes with itself, hence is in $K$. (The identity map is in $K$ as well, as is the zero map!)






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Strictly speaking, the two conditions are not sufficient for $K$ to be a subspace. With only these conditions, it might happen that $K=emptyset$. Fortunately, $Tin K$
            – Hagen von Eitzen
            Jun 5 '17 at 12:04












          • @HagenvonEitzen Yes, thank you for pointing this out.
            – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
            Jun 5 '17 at 12:06














          1












          1








          1






          Let us call the given set K. You will be done if you can show the following two steps:




          1. If $S_1,S_2 in K$, then $S_1 + S_2 in K$.


          2. If $S in K$, then $kS in K$ for all $k$.



          To show the first, note that $(S_1+S_2) circ T = S_1 circ T + S_2 circ T = T circ S_1 + T circ S_2 = T circ (S_1 + S_2)$.



          The second simply follows: $(kS) circ T = k(S circ T) = k(T circ S) = T circ (kS)$.



          You can verify these steps yourself, but do ask if doubts persist. The above two steps show that $K$ is closed under addition, and scalar multiplication respectively, so $K$ is a subspace of $operatorname{Hom} (V,V)$.



          ADDENDUM : I should mention, thanks to the comment below, that $K$ is non-empty , since $T$ commutes with itself, hence is in $K$. (The identity map is in $K$ as well, as is the zero map!)






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Let us call the given set K. You will be done if you can show the following two steps:




          1. If $S_1,S_2 in K$, then $S_1 + S_2 in K$.


          2. If $S in K$, then $kS in K$ for all $k$.



          To show the first, note that $(S_1+S_2) circ T = S_1 circ T + S_2 circ T = T circ S_1 + T circ S_2 = T circ (S_1 + S_2)$.



          The second simply follows: $(kS) circ T = k(S circ T) = k(T circ S) = T circ (kS)$.



          You can verify these steps yourself, but do ask if doubts persist. The above two steps show that $K$ is closed under addition, and scalar multiplication respectively, so $K$ is a subspace of $operatorname{Hom} (V,V)$.



          ADDENDUM : I should mention, thanks to the comment below, that $K$ is non-empty , since $T$ commutes with itself, hence is in $K$. (The identity map is in $K$ as well, as is the zero map!)







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 4 at 5:45

























          answered Jun 5 '17 at 12:01









          астон вілла олоф мэллбэргастон вілла олоф мэллбэрг

          37.4k33376




          37.4k33376












          • Strictly speaking, the two conditions are not sufficient for $K$ to be a subspace. With only these conditions, it might happen that $K=emptyset$. Fortunately, $Tin K$
            – Hagen von Eitzen
            Jun 5 '17 at 12:04












          • @HagenvonEitzen Yes, thank you for pointing this out.
            – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
            Jun 5 '17 at 12:06


















          • Strictly speaking, the two conditions are not sufficient for $K$ to be a subspace. With only these conditions, it might happen that $K=emptyset$. Fortunately, $Tin K$
            – Hagen von Eitzen
            Jun 5 '17 at 12:04












          • @HagenvonEitzen Yes, thank you for pointing this out.
            – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
            Jun 5 '17 at 12:06
















          Strictly speaking, the two conditions are not sufficient for $K$ to be a subspace. With only these conditions, it might happen that $K=emptyset$. Fortunately, $Tin K$
          – Hagen von Eitzen
          Jun 5 '17 at 12:04






          Strictly speaking, the two conditions are not sufficient for $K$ to be a subspace. With only these conditions, it might happen that $K=emptyset$. Fortunately, $Tin K$
          – Hagen von Eitzen
          Jun 5 '17 at 12:04














          @HagenvonEitzen Yes, thank you for pointing this out.
          – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
          Jun 5 '17 at 12:06




          @HagenvonEitzen Yes, thank you for pointing this out.
          – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
          Jun 5 '17 at 12:06


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2310593%2fshowing-a-set-of-subspaces-are-subspaces-of-a-homomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          1300-talet

          1300-talet

          Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8