Maximum weight matching with repeated nodes
We are given two sets of nodes $A$ and $B$ forming a graph where each element $x in A$ can be connected with an element $y in B$ with different possible weights. The graph can be explained in two ways.
There are multiple edges possible between elements of $X$ and $Y$ having different weights.
Elements of $A$ can be matched with repeated nodes of elements of $B$ with different edge weights.
Let $E(x)$ be the set of edges involving element x. Then the maximum weight matching problem can be formulated as follows:
Let $x_{ij}$ takes value 1, if edge $(i, j) in E$ is selected and $w_{ij}$ be weight of edge $(i, j) in E$.
$$text{minimize} sum_{(i, j) in E} x_{ij}w_{ij}$$
$$sum_{j in E(i)}x_{ij} le 1 forall i in A$$
$$sum_{i in E(j)}x_{ij} le 1 forall j in B$$
$$x_{ij} = {0, 1} quad forall (i, j) in E$$
My question is whether this problem satisfy the total unimodularity condition. If it does, how can we prove it? I know proof for the standard problem where you consider submatrices and find the determinant.
Can we still use network flow algorithms to solve this problem?
optimization discrete-optimization bipartite-graph matching-theory
New contributor
add a comment |
We are given two sets of nodes $A$ and $B$ forming a graph where each element $x in A$ can be connected with an element $y in B$ with different possible weights. The graph can be explained in two ways.
There are multiple edges possible between elements of $X$ and $Y$ having different weights.
Elements of $A$ can be matched with repeated nodes of elements of $B$ with different edge weights.
Let $E(x)$ be the set of edges involving element x. Then the maximum weight matching problem can be formulated as follows:
Let $x_{ij}$ takes value 1, if edge $(i, j) in E$ is selected and $w_{ij}$ be weight of edge $(i, j) in E$.
$$text{minimize} sum_{(i, j) in E} x_{ij}w_{ij}$$
$$sum_{j in E(i)}x_{ij} le 1 forall i in A$$
$$sum_{i in E(j)}x_{ij} le 1 forall j in B$$
$$x_{ij} = {0, 1} quad forall (i, j) in E$$
My question is whether this problem satisfy the total unimodularity condition. If it does, how can we prove it? I know proof for the standard problem where you consider submatrices and find the determinant.
Can we still use network flow algorithms to solve this problem?
optimization discrete-optimization bipartite-graph matching-theory
New contributor
add a comment |
We are given two sets of nodes $A$ and $B$ forming a graph where each element $x in A$ can be connected with an element $y in B$ with different possible weights. The graph can be explained in two ways.
There are multiple edges possible between elements of $X$ and $Y$ having different weights.
Elements of $A$ can be matched with repeated nodes of elements of $B$ with different edge weights.
Let $E(x)$ be the set of edges involving element x. Then the maximum weight matching problem can be formulated as follows:
Let $x_{ij}$ takes value 1, if edge $(i, j) in E$ is selected and $w_{ij}$ be weight of edge $(i, j) in E$.
$$text{minimize} sum_{(i, j) in E} x_{ij}w_{ij}$$
$$sum_{j in E(i)}x_{ij} le 1 forall i in A$$
$$sum_{i in E(j)}x_{ij} le 1 forall j in B$$
$$x_{ij} = {0, 1} quad forall (i, j) in E$$
My question is whether this problem satisfy the total unimodularity condition. If it does, how can we prove it? I know proof for the standard problem where you consider submatrices and find the determinant.
Can we still use network flow algorithms to solve this problem?
optimization discrete-optimization bipartite-graph matching-theory
New contributor
We are given two sets of nodes $A$ and $B$ forming a graph where each element $x in A$ can be connected with an element $y in B$ with different possible weights. The graph can be explained in two ways.
There are multiple edges possible between elements of $X$ and $Y$ having different weights.
Elements of $A$ can be matched with repeated nodes of elements of $B$ with different edge weights.
Let $E(x)$ be the set of edges involving element x. Then the maximum weight matching problem can be formulated as follows:
Let $x_{ij}$ takes value 1, if edge $(i, j) in E$ is selected and $w_{ij}$ be weight of edge $(i, j) in E$.
$$text{minimize} sum_{(i, j) in E} x_{ij}w_{ij}$$
$$sum_{j in E(i)}x_{ij} le 1 forall i in A$$
$$sum_{i in E(j)}x_{ij} le 1 forall j in B$$
$$x_{ij} = {0, 1} quad forall (i, j) in E$$
My question is whether this problem satisfy the total unimodularity condition. If it does, how can we prove it? I know proof for the standard problem where you consider submatrices and find the determinant.
Can we still use network flow algorithms to solve this problem?
optimization discrete-optimization bipartite-graph matching-theory
optimization discrete-optimization bipartite-graph matching-theory
New contributor
New contributor
edited Jan 4 at 5:52
Dan
New contributor
asked Jan 4 at 5:30
DanDan
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Dan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061340%2fmaximum-weight-matching-with-repeated-nodes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Dan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061340%2fmaximum-weight-matching-with-repeated-nodes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown