Is repeating a loop twice the same as multiplication by $2$ in singular homology?












1












$begingroup$


I have the following problem understanding the notion of coefficients in Singular Homology. Let $X$ be a topological space (for example closed differential manifold). Let $x:[0,1]rightarrow X$ be a continous path such that $x(0)=x(1)$. Then $x$ defines a homology class $[x]in H_{1}(X;mathbb{Z})$. Define a different path $tilde{x}:[0,1]rightarrow X$ by $tilde{x}(t)=x(2t)$, for $tin [0,1/2]$ and $tilde{x}(t)=x(2t-1)$, for $tin [1/2,1]$ (essentially the loop $x$ run twice).



Question: Do we have that $2[x]=[tilde{x}]$ in $H_{1}(X;mathbb{Z})$?



If yes or no, then can you provide an explanation?



Greetings,
Milan






algebraic-topology homology-cohomology







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You are basically using the Hurewicz homomorphism.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Young
    Jan 7 at 17:19










  • $begingroup$
    Another formulation: as the map $tmapsto 2t$ is the double covering $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1$, the homology class $[tilde{x}]$ is the image of the fundamental class of $S^1$ under the map $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1overset{x}{to} X$. Thus it suffices to show that the double covering map doubles the fundamental clas of $S^1$, which you can find in most textbooks in algebraic topology, eg) Hatcher's.
    $endgroup$
    – cjackal
    Jan 7 at 21:57
















1












$begingroup$


I have the following problem understanding the notion of coefficients in Singular Homology. Let $X$ be a topological space (for example closed differential manifold). Let $x:[0,1]rightarrow X$ be a continous path such that $x(0)=x(1)$. Then $x$ defines a homology class $[x]in H_{1}(X;mathbb{Z})$. Define a different path $tilde{x}:[0,1]rightarrow X$ by $tilde{x}(t)=x(2t)$, for $tin [0,1/2]$ and $tilde{x}(t)=x(2t-1)$, for $tin [1/2,1]$ (essentially the loop $x$ run twice).



Question: Do we have that $2[x]=[tilde{x}]$ in $H_{1}(X;mathbb{Z})$?



If yes or no, then can you provide an explanation?



Greetings,
Milan






algebraic-topology homology-cohomology







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You are basically using the Hurewicz homomorphism.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Young
    Jan 7 at 17:19










  • $begingroup$
    Another formulation: as the map $tmapsto 2t$ is the double covering $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1$, the homology class $[tilde{x}]$ is the image of the fundamental class of $S^1$ under the map $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1overset{x}{to} X$. Thus it suffices to show that the double covering map doubles the fundamental clas of $S^1$, which you can find in most textbooks in algebraic topology, eg) Hatcher's.
    $endgroup$
    – cjackal
    Jan 7 at 21:57














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I have the following problem understanding the notion of coefficients in Singular Homology. Let $X$ be a topological space (for example closed differential manifold). Let $x:[0,1]rightarrow X$ be a continous path such that $x(0)=x(1)$. Then $x$ defines a homology class $[x]in H_{1}(X;mathbb{Z})$. Define a different path $tilde{x}:[0,1]rightarrow X$ by $tilde{x}(t)=x(2t)$, for $tin [0,1/2]$ and $tilde{x}(t)=x(2t-1)$, for $tin [1/2,1]$ (essentially the loop $x$ run twice).



Question: Do we have that $2[x]=[tilde{x}]$ in $H_{1}(X;mathbb{Z})$?



If yes or no, then can you provide an explanation?



Greetings,
Milan






algebraic-topology homology-cohomology







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have the following problem understanding the notion of coefficients in Singular Homology. Let $X$ be a topological space (for example closed differential manifold). Let $x:[0,1]rightarrow X$ be a continous path such that $x(0)=x(1)$. Then $x$ defines a homology class $[x]in H_{1}(X;mathbb{Z})$. Define a different path $tilde{x}:[0,1]rightarrow X$ by $tilde{x}(t)=x(2t)$, for $tin [0,1/2]$ and $tilde{x}(t)=x(2t-1)$, for $tin [1/2,1]$ (essentially the loop $x$ run twice).



Question: Do we have that $2[x]=[tilde{x}]$ in $H_{1}(X;mathbb{Z})$?



If yes or no, then can you provide an explanation?



Greetings,
Milan






algebraic-topology homology-cohomology




algebraic-topology homology-cohomology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 21:45









Eric Wofsey

182k13209337




182k13209337










asked Jan 7 at 16:48









MilanMilan

83




83












  • $begingroup$
    You are basically using the Hurewicz homomorphism.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Young
    Jan 7 at 17:19










  • $begingroup$
    Another formulation: as the map $tmapsto 2t$ is the double covering $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1$, the homology class $[tilde{x}]$ is the image of the fundamental class of $S^1$ under the map $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1overset{x}{to} X$. Thus it suffices to show that the double covering map doubles the fundamental clas of $S^1$, which you can find in most textbooks in algebraic topology, eg) Hatcher's.
    $endgroup$
    – cjackal
    Jan 7 at 21:57


















  • $begingroup$
    You are basically using the Hurewicz homomorphism.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Young
    Jan 7 at 17:19










  • $begingroup$
    Another formulation: as the map $tmapsto 2t$ is the double covering $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1$, the homology class $[tilde{x}]$ is the image of the fundamental class of $S^1$ under the map $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1overset{x}{to} X$. Thus it suffices to show that the double covering map doubles the fundamental clas of $S^1$, which you can find in most textbooks in algebraic topology, eg) Hatcher's.
    $endgroup$
    – cjackal
    Jan 7 at 21:57
















$begingroup$
You are basically using the Hurewicz homomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Justin Young
Jan 7 at 17:19




$begingroup$
You are basically using the Hurewicz homomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Justin Young
Jan 7 at 17:19












$begingroup$
Another formulation: as the map $tmapsto 2t$ is the double covering $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1$, the homology class $[tilde{x}]$ is the image of the fundamental class of $S^1$ under the map $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1overset{x}{to} X$. Thus it suffices to show that the double covering map doubles the fundamental clas of $S^1$, which you can find in most textbooks in algebraic topology, eg) Hatcher's.
$endgroup$
– cjackal
Jan 7 at 21:57




$begingroup$
Another formulation: as the map $tmapsto 2t$ is the double covering $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1$, the homology class $[tilde{x}]$ is the image of the fundamental class of $S^1$ under the map $S^1overset{times 2}{to} S^1overset{x}{to} X$. Thus it suffices to show that the double covering map doubles the fundamental clas of $S^1$, which you can find in most textbooks in algebraic topology, eg) Hatcher's.
$endgroup$
– cjackal
Jan 7 at 21:57










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Yes. Consider an oriented equilateral triangle $Delta=e_0e_1e_2$, and let $f(P)=P’$ for every $P in Delta$, where $P’ in [e_0,e_2]$ and the lines $PP’$ and $e_0e_2$ are perpendicular.



Then the boundary of $tilde{x} circ f$ is exactly $x+x-tilde{x}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065209%2fis-repeating-a-loop-twice-the-same-as-multiplication-by-2-in-singular-homology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Yes. Consider an oriented equilateral triangle $Delta=e_0e_1e_2$, and let $f(P)=P’$ for every $P in Delta$, where $P’ in [e_0,e_2]$ and the lines $PP’$ and $e_0e_2$ are perpendicular.



    Then the boundary of $tilde{x} circ f$ is exactly $x+x-tilde{x}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Yes. Consider an oriented equilateral triangle $Delta=e_0e_1e_2$, and let $f(P)=P’$ for every $P in Delta$, where $P’ in [e_0,e_2]$ and the lines $PP’$ and $e_0e_2$ are perpendicular.



      Then the boundary of $tilde{x} circ f$ is exactly $x+x-tilde{x}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Yes. Consider an oriented equilateral triangle $Delta=e_0e_1e_2$, and let $f(P)=P’$ for every $P in Delta$, where $P’ in [e_0,e_2]$ and the lines $PP’$ and $e_0e_2$ are perpendicular.



        Then the boundary of $tilde{x} circ f$ is exactly $x+x-tilde{x}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Yes. Consider an oriented equilateral triangle $Delta=e_0e_1e_2$, and let $f(P)=P’$ for every $P in Delta$, where $P’ in [e_0,e_2]$ and the lines $PP’$ and $e_0e_2$ are perpendicular.



        Then the boundary of $tilde{x} circ f$ is exactly $x+x-tilde{x}$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 7 at 17:06









        MindlackMindlack

        3,00717




        3,00717






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065209%2fis-repeating-a-loop-twice-the-same-as-multiplication-by-2-in-singular-homology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            An IMO inspired problem

            Image
            14 4 This problem from IMO 1988 is said to be one of the most elegant ones in functional equations. Problem : The function $f$ is defined on the set of all positive integers as follows: begin{align} f(1) = 1, f(3) &= 3, f(2n) = f(n), \ f(4n+1) &= 2f(2n+1) - f(n), \ f(4n+3) &= 3 f(2n+1) - 2f(n) end{align} Find the number of $n$ with $f(n) = n, 1 leq n leq 1988$. The main idea towards the solution is realizing that these conditions stand for the fact that $f(n)$ just reverses the digits in the binary representation of the number $n$. So, essentially the solution is finding the number of binary pallindromes $leq 1988_{10}$. My question is the following : How to reformulate the problem so that $f(n)$ reverses the digits of $n$ in its ternary representation. Or even better, can we reformulate it for a
            Read more

            Management

            Image
            Management From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Manager" redirects here. For other uses, see Management (disambiguation) and Manager (disambiguation). An organization chart for the United States Coast Guard shows the hierarchy of managerial roles in that organization. Business administration Management of a business Accounting Management accounting Financial accounting Financial audit Business entities Cooperative Corporation Limited liability company Partnership Sole proprietorship State-owned enterprise Corporate governance Annual general meeting Board of directors Supervisory board Advisory board Audit committee Corporate law Commercial law Constitutional documents Contract Corporate crime Corporate liability Insolvency law International trade law Mergers and acquisitions Economics Commodity Pu
            Read more

            Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?

            Image
            36 3 The question Has there ever been a military combat going on around an active (running or in outage but not decommissioned) commercial nuclear power plant? Or dangerously near it? If yes, how did the plant and its personnel fare in such situation? Why I ask Let's assume for the scope of this question modern commercial nuclear power plants (CANDU, PWR, BWR of generation II plus all of gen III and newer) are usually reasonably safe to operate given that the engineering has been done right and there is a whole cohort of very well trained personnel on-site at all times, well rested and with considerable resources on their hands. Things hard to get with an armed conflict like the recent Syrian war raging around. I can't seem to find any reference or a comprehensive article about this, hence this question.
            Read more