Does a continuous-time stochastic process satisfying this evolution equation have the Markov property?












1














It is well-known that, for a continuous-time Markov process, the transition probabilities $mathbf{P} = mathbb{P}left[X(t) = j |X(0) = iright]$ satisfy the following evolution equation:



$$frac{dmathbf{P}}{dt} = mathbf{A}{mathbf{P}}$$



where $mathbf{A}$ is a time-independent matrix usually called the generator matrix.



If I were to identify a stochastic process whose transition probabilities evolve according to this equation, would this immediately imply the process possesses the Markov property?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • No, because this says nothing about higher dimensional marginals of the process, for example, about whether $$P(X(2)in Bmid X(1),X(0))=P(X(2)in Bmid X(1))$$
    – Did
    2 days ago












  • Additional to @Did's comment, if you consider a stochastic differential equation for $X_t$: ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are, say, smooth functions, and $W_t$ denotes the Wiener process, then $X_t$ has the Markov property. However, this does not hold true if ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t,t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t,t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are time-dependent.
    – hypernova
    2 days ago
















1














It is well-known that, for a continuous-time Markov process, the transition probabilities $mathbf{P} = mathbb{P}left[X(t) = j |X(0) = iright]$ satisfy the following evolution equation:



$$frac{dmathbf{P}}{dt} = mathbf{A}{mathbf{P}}$$



where $mathbf{A}$ is a time-independent matrix usually called the generator matrix.



If I were to identify a stochastic process whose transition probabilities evolve according to this equation, would this immediately imply the process possesses the Markov property?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • No, because this says nothing about higher dimensional marginals of the process, for example, about whether $$P(X(2)in Bmid X(1),X(0))=P(X(2)in Bmid X(1))$$
    – Did
    2 days ago












  • Additional to @Did's comment, if you consider a stochastic differential equation for $X_t$: ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are, say, smooth functions, and $W_t$ denotes the Wiener process, then $X_t$ has the Markov property. However, this does not hold true if ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t,t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t,t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are time-dependent.
    – hypernova
    2 days ago














1












1








1


1





It is well-known that, for a continuous-time Markov process, the transition probabilities $mathbf{P} = mathbb{P}left[X(t) = j |X(0) = iright]$ satisfy the following evolution equation:



$$frac{dmathbf{P}}{dt} = mathbf{A}{mathbf{P}}$$



where $mathbf{A}$ is a time-independent matrix usually called the generator matrix.



If I were to identify a stochastic process whose transition probabilities evolve according to this equation, would this immediately imply the process possesses the Markov property?










share|cite|improve this question















It is well-known that, for a continuous-time Markov process, the transition probabilities $mathbf{P} = mathbb{P}left[X(t) = j |X(0) = iright]$ satisfy the following evolution equation:



$$frac{dmathbf{P}}{dt} = mathbf{A}{mathbf{P}}$$



where $mathbf{A}$ is a time-independent matrix usually called the generator matrix.



If I were to identify a stochastic process whose transition probabilities evolve according to this equation, would this immediately imply the process possesses the Markov property?







probability stochastic-processes markov-process






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







aghostinthefigures

















asked Jan 4 at 22:41









aghostinthefiguresaghostinthefigures

1,2301216




1,2301216












  • No, because this says nothing about higher dimensional marginals of the process, for example, about whether $$P(X(2)in Bmid X(1),X(0))=P(X(2)in Bmid X(1))$$
    – Did
    2 days ago












  • Additional to @Did's comment, if you consider a stochastic differential equation for $X_t$: ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are, say, smooth functions, and $W_t$ denotes the Wiener process, then $X_t$ has the Markov property. However, this does not hold true if ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t,t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t,t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are time-dependent.
    – hypernova
    2 days ago


















  • No, because this says nothing about higher dimensional marginals of the process, for example, about whether $$P(X(2)in Bmid X(1),X(0))=P(X(2)in Bmid X(1))$$
    – Did
    2 days ago












  • Additional to @Did's comment, if you consider a stochastic differential equation for $X_t$: ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are, say, smooth functions, and $W_t$ denotes the Wiener process, then $X_t$ has the Markov property. However, this does not hold true if ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t,t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t,t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are time-dependent.
    – hypernova
    2 days ago
















No, because this says nothing about higher dimensional marginals of the process, for example, about whether $$P(X(2)in Bmid X(1),X(0))=P(X(2)in Bmid X(1))$$
– Did
2 days ago






No, because this says nothing about higher dimensional marginals of the process, for example, about whether $$P(X(2)in Bmid X(1),X(0))=P(X(2)in Bmid X(1))$$
– Did
2 days ago














Additional to @Did's comment, if you consider a stochastic differential equation for $X_t$: ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are, say, smooth functions, and $W_t$ denotes the Wiener process, then $X_t$ has the Markov property. However, this does not hold true if ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t,t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t,t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are time-dependent.
– hypernova
2 days ago




Additional to @Did's comment, if you consider a stochastic differential equation for $X_t$: ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are, say, smooth functions, and $W_t$ denotes the Wiener process, then $X_t$ has the Markov property. However, this does not hold true if ${rm d}X_t=b(X_t,t),{rm d}t+sigma(X_t,t),{rm d}W_t$, where $b$ and $sigma$ are time-dependent.
– hypernova
2 days ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062200%2fdoes-a-continuous-time-stochastic-process-satisfying-this-evolution-equation-hav%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062200%2fdoes-a-continuous-time-stochastic-process-satisfying-this-evolution-equation-hav%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

1300-talet

1300-talet

Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?