What is the conductor of $ mathbb Q(sqrt 2 )/mathbb Q?$ $4mathbb Z$ or $8 mathbb Z?$
By execise 6.8 of Childress's Class Field Theory, $mathbb f(mathbb Q(sqrt 2)/ mathbb Q)=8mathbb Z$. But considering the norm of the local field about the place correspondent with 2, it should be $4mathbb Z$ and there is contraction to the ordering theorem.
algebraic-number-theory
|
show 2 more comments
By execise 6.8 of Childress's Class Field Theory, $mathbb f(mathbb Q(sqrt 2)/ mathbb Q)=8mathbb Z$. But considering the norm of the local field about the place correspondent with 2, it should be $4mathbb Z$ and there is contraction to the ordering theorem.
algebraic-number-theory
1
Certainly $m=8$ is the smallest integer such that $Bbb{Q}(sqrt2)subseteqBbb{Q}(zeta_m)$. What does the ording theorem say. I couldn't find it.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 6:50
Also, it seems to me that $1+8Bbb{Z}$ is contained in the image of the norm map, but $1+4Bbb{Z}$ certainly is not: $x^2-2y^2notequiv5pmod8$. So the local conductor is $3$ resulting in a factor $2^3$. What result suggests that it should $4$ only?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 7:18
Yes, you are right. By the lemme 5.3 of Childress's Class Field Theory, I get that. And the ordering theorem is on P136. It seems that I am wrong about the image of the norm map.
– lorry
Jan 3 at 8:09
I don't have Childress, that's why I asked you to quote the theorem. Anyway, integers congruent to $1$ modulo $8$ have square roots in $Bbb{Q}_2$, so they are trivially included in the image of the norm.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 10:29
Let $k_1/ mathbb Q_p$ and $k_2/k_1$ be finite extensions and $Gal(k_2/k_1)$ is cyclic. Let $mathbb U_j$ denote the units of the valuation ring of $k_j$.Then $[mathbb U_1 : mathbb N_{k_2/k_1}mathbb U_2]=e(k_2/k_1)$. In this case, $[1+2mathbb Z_2:mathbb N_{k_2/mathbb Q_2}mathbb U_2]=2$, then the image of the norm map is $1+2^2mathbb Z_2$
– lorry
Jan 4 at 3:34
|
show 2 more comments
By execise 6.8 of Childress's Class Field Theory, $mathbb f(mathbb Q(sqrt 2)/ mathbb Q)=8mathbb Z$. But considering the norm of the local field about the place correspondent with 2, it should be $4mathbb Z$ and there is contraction to the ordering theorem.
algebraic-number-theory
By execise 6.8 of Childress's Class Field Theory, $mathbb f(mathbb Q(sqrt 2)/ mathbb Q)=8mathbb Z$. But considering the norm of the local field about the place correspondent with 2, it should be $4mathbb Z$ and there is contraction to the ordering theorem.
algebraic-number-theory
algebraic-number-theory
edited Jan 7 at 0:32
lorry
asked Jan 3 at 6:36
lorry lorry
112
112
1
Certainly $m=8$ is the smallest integer such that $Bbb{Q}(sqrt2)subseteqBbb{Q}(zeta_m)$. What does the ording theorem say. I couldn't find it.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 6:50
Also, it seems to me that $1+8Bbb{Z}$ is contained in the image of the norm map, but $1+4Bbb{Z}$ certainly is not: $x^2-2y^2notequiv5pmod8$. So the local conductor is $3$ resulting in a factor $2^3$. What result suggests that it should $4$ only?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 7:18
Yes, you are right. By the lemme 5.3 of Childress's Class Field Theory, I get that. And the ordering theorem is on P136. It seems that I am wrong about the image of the norm map.
– lorry
Jan 3 at 8:09
I don't have Childress, that's why I asked you to quote the theorem. Anyway, integers congruent to $1$ modulo $8$ have square roots in $Bbb{Q}_2$, so they are trivially included in the image of the norm.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 10:29
Let $k_1/ mathbb Q_p$ and $k_2/k_1$ be finite extensions and $Gal(k_2/k_1)$ is cyclic. Let $mathbb U_j$ denote the units of the valuation ring of $k_j$.Then $[mathbb U_1 : mathbb N_{k_2/k_1}mathbb U_2]=e(k_2/k_1)$. In this case, $[1+2mathbb Z_2:mathbb N_{k_2/mathbb Q_2}mathbb U_2]=2$, then the image of the norm map is $1+2^2mathbb Z_2$
– lorry
Jan 4 at 3:34
|
show 2 more comments
1
Certainly $m=8$ is the smallest integer such that $Bbb{Q}(sqrt2)subseteqBbb{Q}(zeta_m)$. What does the ording theorem say. I couldn't find it.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 6:50
Also, it seems to me that $1+8Bbb{Z}$ is contained in the image of the norm map, but $1+4Bbb{Z}$ certainly is not: $x^2-2y^2notequiv5pmod8$. So the local conductor is $3$ resulting in a factor $2^3$. What result suggests that it should $4$ only?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 7:18
Yes, you are right. By the lemme 5.3 of Childress's Class Field Theory, I get that. And the ordering theorem is on P136. It seems that I am wrong about the image of the norm map.
– lorry
Jan 3 at 8:09
I don't have Childress, that's why I asked you to quote the theorem. Anyway, integers congruent to $1$ modulo $8$ have square roots in $Bbb{Q}_2$, so they are trivially included in the image of the norm.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 10:29
Let $k_1/ mathbb Q_p$ and $k_2/k_1$ be finite extensions and $Gal(k_2/k_1)$ is cyclic. Let $mathbb U_j$ denote the units of the valuation ring of $k_j$.Then $[mathbb U_1 : mathbb N_{k_2/k_1}mathbb U_2]=e(k_2/k_1)$. In this case, $[1+2mathbb Z_2:mathbb N_{k_2/mathbb Q_2}mathbb U_2]=2$, then the image of the norm map is $1+2^2mathbb Z_2$
– lorry
Jan 4 at 3:34
1
1
Certainly $m=8$ is the smallest integer such that $Bbb{Q}(sqrt2)subseteqBbb{Q}(zeta_m)$. What does the ording theorem say. I couldn't find it.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 6:50
Certainly $m=8$ is the smallest integer such that $Bbb{Q}(sqrt2)subseteqBbb{Q}(zeta_m)$. What does the ording theorem say. I couldn't find it.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 6:50
Also, it seems to me that $1+8Bbb{Z}$ is contained in the image of the norm map, but $1+4Bbb{Z}$ certainly is not: $x^2-2y^2notequiv5pmod8$. So the local conductor is $3$ resulting in a factor $2^3$. What result suggests that it should $4$ only?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 7:18
Also, it seems to me that $1+8Bbb{Z}$ is contained in the image of the norm map, but $1+4Bbb{Z}$ certainly is not: $x^2-2y^2notequiv5pmod8$. So the local conductor is $3$ resulting in a factor $2^3$. What result suggests that it should $4$ only?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 7:18
Yes, you are right. By the lemme 5.3 of Childress's Class Field Theory, I get that. And the ordering theorem is on P136. It seems that I am wrong about the image of the norm map.
– lorry
Jan 3 at 8:09
Yes, you are right. By the lemme 5.3 of Childress's Class Field Theory, I get that. And the ordering theorem is on P136. It seems that I am wrong about the image of the norm map.
– lorry
Jan 3 at 8:09
I don't have Childress, that's why I asked you to quote the theorem. Anyway, integers congruent to $1$ modulo $8$ have square roots in $Bbb{Q}_2$, so they are trivially included in the image of the norm.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 10:29
I don't have Childress, that's why I asked you to quote the theorem. Anyway, integers congruent to $1$ modulo $8$ have square roots in $Bbb{Q}_2$, so they are trivially included in the image of the norm.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 10:29
Let $k_1/ mathbb Q_p$ and $k_2/k_1$ be finite extensions and $Gal(k_2/k_1)$ is cyclic. Let $mathbb U_j$ denote the units of the valuation ring of $k_j$.Then $[mathbb U_1 : mathbb N_{k_2/k_1}mathbb U_2]=e(k_2/k_1)$. In this case, $[1+2mathbb Z_2:mathbb N_{k_2/mathbb Q_2}mathbb U_2]=2$, then the image of the norm map is $1+2^2mathbb Z_2$
– lorry
Jan 4 at 3:34
Let $k_1/ mathbb Q_p$ and $k_2/k_1$ be finite extensions and $Gal(k_2/k_1)$ is cyclic. Let $mathbb U_j$ denote the units of the valuation ring of $k_j$.Then $[mathbb U_1 : mathbb N_{k_2/k_1}mathbb U_2]=e(k_2/k_1)$. In this case, $[1+2mathbb Z_2:mathbb N_{k_2/mathbb Q_2}mathbb U_2]=2$, then the image of the norm map is $1+2^2mathbb Z_2$
– lorry
Jan 4 at 3:34
|
show 2 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060308%2fwhat-is-the-conductor-of-mathbb-q-sqrt-2-mathbb-q-4-mathbb-z-or-8-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060308%2fwhat-is-the-conductor-of-mathbb-q-sqrt-2-mathbb-q-4-mathbb-z-or-8-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Certainly $m=8$ is the smallest integer such that $Bbb{Q}(sqrt2)subseteqBbb{Q}(zeta_m)$. What does the ording theorem say. I couldn't find it.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 6:50
Also, it seems to me that $1+8Bbb{Z}$ is contained in the image of the norm map, but $1+4Bbb{Z}$ certainly is not: $x^2-2y^2notequiv5pmod8$. So the local conductor is $3$ resulting in a factor $2^3$. What result suggests that it should $4$ only?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 7:18
Yes, you are right. By the lemme 5.3 of Childress's Class Field Theory, I get that. And the ordering theorem is on P136. It seems that I am wrong about the image of the norm map.
– lorry
Jan 3 at 8:09
I don't have Childress, that's why I asked you to quote the theorem. Anyway, integers congruent to $1$ modulo $8$ have square roots in $Bbb{Q}_2$, so they are trivially included in the image of the norm.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 3 at 10:29
Let $k_1/ mathbb Q_p$ and $k_2/k_1$ be finite extensions and $Gal(k_2/k_1)$ is cyclic. Let $mathbb U_j$ denote the units of the valuation ring of $k_j$.Then $[mathbb U_1 : mathbb N_{k_2/k_1}mathbb U_2]=e(k_2/k_1)$. In this case, $[1+2mathbb Z_2:mathbb N_{k_2/mathbb Q_2}mathbb U_2]=2$, then the image of the norm map is $1+2^2mathbb Z_2$
– lorry
Jan 4 at 3:34