L'Hopital's Rule and subsitution of derivative limit












-1












$begingroup$


So we're starting with the limit definition of a derivative and we want to prove something related to this with l'hopital's rule. We'll have to check that $f'$ and $g'$ exist. We're also given that $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ exists.



Assuming that limits work like this: $ lim limits_{xto a} frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{lim limits_{xto a} (f(x)-f(a)) }{lim limits_{xto a} (g(x)-g(a))} = frac{lim limits_{xto a} f(x)-lim limits_{xto a} f(a)}{lim limits_{xto a} g(x)-lim limits_{xto a} g(a)}$



After differentiating the numerator, can we just substitute the given $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ for $lim limits_{xto a} f'(a)$ ?



Edit: I just realized that it is more likely that we are substituting $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ for $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x)$ and that the f'(a) becomes 0 due to differentiation. Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why do you assume "limits work like this"? In your second fraction numerator and denominator might both be zero, even though the limit of your first fraction exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 5 at 7:33










  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown Because of the limit laws, specifically for that the limit quotient law.
    $endgroup$
    – user2793618
    Jan 5 at 7:44
















-1












$begingroup$


So we're starting with the limit definition of a derivative and we want to prove something related to this with l'hopital's rule. We'll have to check that $f'$ and $g'$ exist. We're also given that $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ exists.



Assuming that limits work like this: $ lim limits_{xto a} frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{lim limits_{xto a} (f(x)-f(a)) }{lim limits_{xto a} (g(x)-g(a))} = frac{lim limits_{xto a} f(x)-lim limits_{xto a} f(a)}{lim limits_{xto a} g(x)-lim limits_{xto a} g(a)}$



After differentiating the numerator, can we just substitute the given $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ for $lim limits_{xto a} f'(a)$ ?



Edit: I just realized that it is more likely that we are substituting $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ for $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x)$ and that the f'(a) becomes 0 due to differentiation. Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why do you assume "limits work like this"? In your second fraction numerator and denominator might both be zero, even though the limit of your first fraction exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 5 at 7:33










  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown Because of the limit laws, specifically for that the limit quotient law.
    $endgroup$
    – user2793618
    Jan 5 at 7:44














-1












-1








-1


1



$begingroup$


So we're starting with the limit definition of a derivative and we want to prove something related to this with l'hopital's rule. We'll have to check that $f'$ and $g'$ exist. We're also given that $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ exists.



Assuming that limits work like this: $ lim limits_{xto a} frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{lim limits_{xto a} (f(x)-f(a)) }{lim limits_{xto a} (g(x)-g(a))} = frac{lim limits_{xto a} f(x)-lim limits_{xto a} f(a)}{lim limits_{xto a} g(x)-lim limits_{xto a} g(a)}$



After differentiating the numerator, can we just substitute the given $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ for $lim limits_{xto a} f'(a)$ ?



Edit: I just realized that it is more likely that we are substituting $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ for $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x)$ and that the f'(a) becomes 0 due to differentiation. Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




So we're starting with the limit definition of a derivative and we want to prove something related to this with l'hopital's rule. We'll have to check that $f'$ and $g'$ exist. We're also given that $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ exists.



Assuming that limits work like this: $ lim limits_{xto a} frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{lim limits_{xto a} (f(x)-f(a)) }{lim limits_{xto a} (g(x)-g(a))} = frac{lim limits_{xto a} f(x)-lim limits_{xto a} f(a)}{lim limits_{xto a} g(x)-lim limits_{xto a} g(a)}$



After differentiating the numerator, can we just substitute the given $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ for $lim limits_{xto a} f'(a)$ ?



Edit: I just realized that it is more likely that we are substituting $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x) =k$ for $lim limits_{xto a} f'(x)$ and that the f'(a) becomes 0 due to differentiation. Is this correct?







calculus proof-writing






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 5 at 7:48







user2793618

















asked Jan 5 at 7:28









user2793618user2793618

907




907












  • $begingroup$
    Why do you assume "limits work like this"? In your second fraction numerator and denominator might both be zero, even though the limit of your first fraction exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 5 at 7:33










  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown Because of the limit laws, specifically for that the limit quotient law.
    $endgroup$
    – user2793618
    Jan 5 at 7:44


















  • $begingroup$
    Why do you assume "limits work like this"? In your second fraction numerator and denominator might both be zero, even though the limit of your first fraction exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jan 5 at 7:33










  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown Because of the limit laws, specifically for that the limit quotient law.
    $endgroup$
    – user2793618
    Jan 5 at 7:44
















$begingroup$
Why do you assume "limits work like this"? In your second fraction numerator and denominator might both be zero, even though the limit of your first fraction exists.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 5 at 7:33




$begingroup$
Why do you assume "limits work like this"? In your second fraction numerator and denominator might both be zero, even though the limit of your first fraction exists.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 5 at 7:33












$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown Because of the limit laws, specifically for that the limit quotient law.
$endgroup$
– user2793618
Jan 5 at 7:44




$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown Because of the limit laws, specifically for that the limit quotient law.
$endgroup$
– user2793618
Jan 5 at 7:44










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062476%2flhopitals-rule-and-subsitution-of-derivative-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062476%2flhopitals-rule-and-subsitution-of-derivative-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

1300-talet

1300-talet

Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?