Where can I listen to the actual cockpit voice recorder audio from US Airways Flight 1549? [duplicate]












17
















This question already has an answer here:




  • Does the NTSB provide CVR audio recordings alongside transcripts in accident reports?

    1 answer




I have searched for the audio recorded on the CVR from the US Airways Flight 1549, but all clips and audios I found seems to be audio recorded from the flight control and not from microphones inside the cockpit.



For example:






In this clip, we only hear the pilot sparsely, but the air traffic control and the airport tower controls quite often. Although, we can also see a transcript of what is said in the cockpit, so there obviously exists some recordings from the cockpit.



Where can I listen to the audio recorded from the cockpit and not from the air traffic control?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Björn Larsson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by Sanchises, Community 17 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.




















    17
















    This question already has an answer here:




    • Does the NTSB provide CVR audio recordings alongside transcripts in accident reports?

      1 answer




    I have searched for the audio recorded on the CVR from the US Airways Flight 1549, but all clips and audios I found seems to be audio recorded from the flight control and not from microphones inside the cockpit.



    For example:






    In this clip, we only hear the pilot sparsely, but the air traffic control and the airport tower controls quite often. Although, we can also see a transcript of what is said in the cockpit, so there obviously exists some recordings from the cockpit.



    Where can I listen to the audio recorded from the cockpit and not from the air traffic control?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Björn Larsson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.











    marked as duplicate by Sanchises, Community 17 hours ago


    This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















      17












      17








      17









      This question already has an answer here:




      • Does the NTSB provide CVR audio recordings alongside transcripts in accident reports?

        1 answer




      I have searched for the audio recorded on the CVR from the US Airways Flight 1549, but all clips and audios I found seems to be audio recorded from the flight control and not from microphones inside the cockpit.



      For example:






      In this clip, we only hear the pilot sparsely, but the air traffic control and the airport tower controls quite often. Although, we can also see a transcript of what is said in the cockpit, so there obviously exists some recordings from the cockpit.



      Where can I listen to the audio recorded from the cockpit and not from the air traffic control?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Björn Larsson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.













      This question already has an answer here:




      • Does the NTSB provide CVR audio recordings alongside transcripts in accident reports?

        1 answer




      I have searched for the audio recorded on the CVR from the US Airways Flight 1549, but all clips and audios I found seems to be audio recorded from the flight control and not from microphones inside the cockpit.



      For example:






      In this clip, we only hear the pilot sparsely, but the air traffic control and the airport tower controls quite often. Although, we can also see a transcript of what is said in the cockpit, so there obviously exists some recordings from the cockpit.



      Where can I listen to the audio recorded from the cockpit and not from the air traffic control?





      This question already has an answer here:




      • Does the NTSB provide CVR audio recordings alongside transcripts in accident reports?

        1 answer
















      cockpit-voice-recorder us1549-accident






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Björn Larsson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Björn Larsson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      Jimy

      1,45731227




      1,45731227






      New contributor




      Björn Larsson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      Björn LarssonBjörn Larsson

      18817




      18817




      New contributor




      Björn Larsson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Björn Larsson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Björn Larsson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      marked as duplicate by Sanchises, Community 17 hours ago


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






      marked as duplicate by Sanchises, Community 17 hours ago


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          41














          You can't, because it is in fact forbidden to release CVR audio under US law. From the NTSB:




          The CVR recordings are treated differently than the other factual information obtained in an accident investigation. Due to the highly sensitive nature of the verbal communications inside the cockpit, Congress has required that the Safety Board not release any part of a CVR audio recording.




          Other countries may have different rules.



          This rule came about after the crash of Delta Air Lines flight 1141, (commented by @MichaelK)




          [...] where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats







          share|improve this answer





















          • 17





            You can't listen to it, but you can read the transcripts. This rule is mostly to avoid the stress/grief caused to families as they listen to the last minutes of a loved ones life.

            – Ron Beyer
            2 days ago








          • 30





            Trivia about that: this decision came about after the fatal accident of Delta Air Lines 1141 in 1988, where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats.

            – MichaelK
            2 days ago






          • 10





            @Fattie Want to know the final rub of salt in the wound? It was the CVR recording that revealed that the flap and slat points on the checklists had not been stated by the crew, and that there were no sounds from the handles being moved... thus presenting solid evidence that the flaps and slats were not extended. This recording was then played on the news, the crew's error being laid bare for all hear. As a direct result of this, legislation came into place that the NTSB may not release recordings from CVRs.

            – MichaelK
            2 days ago








          • 22





            The 1st amdmt protects a person from being told what to say by the State. It doesn't mandate that investigators have to broadcast the final words of people to the public.

            – John K
            2 days ago






          • 14





            "highly sensitive nature" - "[extremely embarrassing and costing us money, so we all got together and lobbied Congress to make it illegal]"

            – Mazura
            2 days ago



















          9














          You can't listen to it due to the regulation mentioned in Sanchises' answer, but you can find the transcripts. There is one here, for example.






          share|improve this answer






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            41














            You can't, because it is in fact forbidden to release CVR audio under US law. From the NTSB:




            The CVR recordings are treated differently than the other factual information obtained in an accident investigation. Due to the highly sensitive nature of the verbal communications inside the cockpit, Congress has required that the Safety Board not release any part of a CVR audio recording.




            Other countries may have different rules.



            This rule came about after the crash of Delta Air Lines flight 1141, (commented by @MichaelK)




            [...] where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats







            share|improve this answer





















            • 17





              You can't listen to it, but you can read the transcripts. This rule is mostly to avoid the stress/grief caused to families as they listen to the last minutes of a loved ones life.

              – Ron Beyer
              2 days ago








            • 30





              Trivia about that: this decision came about after the fatal accident of Delta Air Lines 1141 in 1988, where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats.

              – MichaelK
              2 days ago






            • 10





              @Fattie Want to know the final rub of salt in the wound? It was the CVR recording that revealed that the flap and slat points on the checklists had not been stated by the crew, and that there were no sounds from the handles being moved... thus presenting solid evidence that the flaps and slats were not extended. This recording was then played on the news, the crew's error being laid bare for all hear. As a direct result of this, legislation came into place that the NTSB may not release recordings from CVRs.

              – MichaelK
              2 days ago








            • 22





              The 1st amdmt protects a person from being told what to say by the State. It doesn't mandate that investigators have to broadcast the final words of people to the public.

              – John K
              2 days ago






            • 14





              "highly sensitive nature" - "[extremely embarrassing and costing us money, so we all got together and lobbied Congress to make it illegal]"

              – Mazura
              2 days ago
















            41














            You can't, because it is in fact forbidden to release CVR audio under US law. From the NTSB:




            The CVR recordings are treated differently than the other factual information obtained in an accident investigation. Due to the highly sensitive nature of the verbal communications inside the cockpit, Congress has required that the Safety Board not release any part of a CVR audio recording.




            Other countries may have different rules.



            This rule came about after the crash of Delta Air Lines flight 1141, (commented by @MichaelK)




            [...] where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats







            share|improve this answer





















            • 17





              You can't listen to it, but you can read the transcripts. This rule is mostly to avoid the stress/grief caused to families as they listen to the last minutes of a loved ones life.

              – Ron Beyer
              2 days ago








            • 30





              Trivia about that: this decision came about after the fatal accident of Delta Air Lines 1141 in 1988, where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats.

              – MichaelK
              2 days ago






            • 10





              @Fattie Want to know the final rub of salt in the wound? It was the CVR recording that revealed that the flap and slat points on the checklists had not been stated by the crew, and that there were no sounds from the handles being moved... thus presenting solid evidence that the flaps and slats were not extended. This recording was then played on the news, the crew's error being laid bare for all hear. As a direct result of this, legislation came into place that the NTSB may not release recordings from CVRs.

              – MichaelK
              2 days ago








            • 22





              The 1st amdmt protects a person from being told what to say by the State. It doesn't mandate that investigators have to broadcast the final words of people to the public.

              – John K
              2 days ago






            • 14





              "highly sensitive nature" - "[extremely embarrassing and costing us money, so we all got together and lobbied Congress to make it illegal]"

              – Mazura
              2 days ago














            41












            41








            41







            You can't, because it is in fact forbidden to release CVR audio under US law. From the NTSB:




            The CVR recordings are treated differently than the other factual information obtained in an accident investigation. Due to the highly sensitive nature of the verbal communications inside the cockpit, Congress has required that the Safety Board not release any part of a CVR audio recording.




            Other countries may have different rules.



            This rule came about after the crash of Delta Air Lines flight 1141, (commented by @MichaelK)




            [...] where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats







            share|improve this answer















            You can't, because it is in fact forbidden to release CVR audio under US law. From the NTSB:




            The CVR recordings are treated differently than the other factual information obtained in an accident investigation. Due to the highly sensitive nature of the verbal communications inside the cockpit, Congress has required that the Safety Board not release any part of a CVR audio recording.




            Other countries may have different rules.



            This rule came about after the crash of Delta Air Lines flight 1141, (commented by @MichaelK)




            [...] where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 18 hours ago

























            answered 2 days ago









            SanchisesSanchises

            5,95712453




            5,95712453








            • 17





              You can't listen to it, but you can read the transcripts. This rule is mostly to avoid the stress/grief caused to families as they listen to the last minutes of a loved ones life.

              – Ron Beyer
              2 days ago








            • 30





              Trivia about that: this decision came about after the fatal accident of Delta Air Lines 1141 in 1988, where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats.

              – MichaelK
              2 days ago






            • 10





              @Fattie Want to know the final rub of salt in the wound? It was the CVR recording that revealed that the flap and slat points on the checklists had not been stated by the crew, and that there were no sounds from the handles being moved... thus presenting solid evidence that the flaps and slats were not extended. This recording was then played on the news, the crew's error being laid bare for all hear. As a direct result of this, legislation came into place that the NTSB may not release recordings from CVRs.

              – MichaelK
              2 days ago








            • 22





              The 1st amdmt protects a person from being told what to say by the State. It doesn't mandate that investigators have to broadcast the final words of people to the public.

              – John K
              2 days ago






            • 14





              "highly sensitive nature" - "[extremely embarrassing and costing us money, so we all got together and lobbied Congress to make it illegal]"

              – Mazura
              2 days ago














            • 17





              You can't listen to it, but you can read the transcripts. This rule is mostly to avoid the stress/grief caused to families as they listen to the last minutes of a loved ones life.

              – Ron Beyer
              2 days ago








            • 30





              Trivia about that: this decision came about after the fatal accident of Delta Air Lines 1141 in 1988, where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats.

              – MichaelK
              2 days ago






            • 10





              @Fattie Want to know the final rub of salt in the wound? It was the CVR recording that revealed that the flap and slat points on the checklists had not been stated by the crew, and that there were no sounds from the handles being moved... thus presenting solid evidence that the flaps and slats were not extended. This recording was then played on the news, the crew's error being laid bare for all hear. As a direct result of this, legislation came into place that the NTSB may not release recordings from CVRs.

              – MichaelK
              2 days ago








            • 22





              The 1st amdmt protects a person from being told what to say by the State. It doesn't mandate that investigators have to broadcast the final words of people to the public.

              – John K
              2 days ago






            • 14





              "highly sensitive nature" - "[extremely embarrassing and costing us money, so we all got together and lobbied Congress to make it illegal]"

              – Mazura
              2 days ago








            17




            17





            You can't listen to it, but you can read the transcripts. This rule is mostly to avoid the stress/grief caused to families as they listen to the last minutes of a loved ones life.

            – Ron Beyer
            2 days ago







            You can't listen to it, but you can read the transcripts. This rule is mostly to avoid the stress/grief caused to families as they listen to the last minutes of a loved ones life.

            – Ron Beyer
            2 days ago






            30




            30





            Trivia about that: this decision came about after the fatal accident of Delta Air Lines 1141 in 1988, where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats.

            – MichaelK
            2 days ago





            Trivia about that: this decision came about after the fatal accident of Delta Air Lines 1141 in 1988, where the crew — in extremely cruel irony — were bantering on the flight deck about what to say that would get captured on the CVR in case of a crash. That irony was then squared in that the bantering was a directly contributing cause of the crash, in that they forgot to deploy flaps and slats.

            – MichaelK
            2 days ago




            10




            10





            @Fattie Want to know the final rub of salt in the wound? It was the CVR recording that revealed that the flap and slat points on the checklists had not been stated by the crew, and that there were no sounds from the handles being moved... thus presenting solid evidence that the flaps and slats were not extended. This recording was then played on the news, the crew's error being laid bare for all hear. As a direct result of this, legislation came into place that the NTSB may not release recordings from CVRs.

            – MichaelK
            2 days ago







            @Fattie Want to know the final rub of salt in the wound? It was the CVR recording that revealed that the flap and slat points on the checklists had not been stated by the crew, and that there were no sounds from the handles being moved... thus presenting solid evidence that the flaps and slats were not extended. This recording was then played on the news, the crew's error being laid bare for all hear. As a direct result of this, legislation came into place that the NTSB may not release recordings from CVRs.

            – MichaelK
            2 days ago






            22




            22





            The 1st amdmt protects a person from being told what to say by the State. It doesn't mandate that investigators have to broadcast the final words of people to the public.

            – John K
            2 days ago





            The 1st amdmt protects a person from being told what to say by the State. It doesn't mandate that investigators have to broadcast the final words of people to the public.

            – John K
            2 days ago




            14




            14





            "highly sensitive nature" - "[extremely embarrassing and costing us money, so we all got together and lobbied Congress to make it illegal]"

            – Mazura
            2 days ago





            "highly sensitive nature" - "[extremely embarrassing and costing us money, so we all got together and lobbied Congress to make it illegal]"

            – Mazura
            2 days ago











            9














            You can't listen to it due to the regulation mentioned in Sanchises' answer, but you can find the transcripts. There is one here, for example.






            share|improve this answer




























              9














              You can't listen to it due to the regulation mentioned in Sanchises' answer, but you can find the transcripts. There is one here, for example.






              share|improve this answer


























                9












                9








                9







                You can't listen to it due to the regulation mentioned in Sanchises' answer, but you can find the transcripts. There is one here, for example.






                share|improve this answer













                You can't listen to it due to the regulation mentioned in Sanchises' answer, but you can find the transcripts. There is one here, for example.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                reirabreirab

                13.9k135106




                13.9k135106















                    Popular posts from this blog

                    1300-talet

                    1300-talet

                    Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?