Should messages in WP_Error already be html escaped?












2















This isn't about what html escaping is or how it's done, but if there's an established best practice about when to do it.



I have some utility code in my plugin that may generate a WP_Error based on user input, and other display code that shows that WP_Error. Of course that user input needs to be html escaped when displaying, but I'm not sure when would be the best time to do it.



I have a choice about whether to:




  • Escape the message as I'm constructing the WP_Error, and the display code shows it as-is.


  • Don't worry about escaping when constructing the WP_Error, and in the display code fully escape all the WP_Error messages.



Either would work, but if my plugin ends up interacting with other plugins and possibly displaying their WP_Error or vice-versa, I'd like to match whatever precedent exists in the Wordpress world.



I had hoped the documentation would address this, but I didn't see anything on https://codex.wordpress.org/Class_Reference/WP_Error










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jason Viers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    2















    This isn't about what html escaping is or how it's done, but if there's an established best practice about when to do it.



    I have some utility code in my plugin that may generate a WP_Error based on user input, and other display code that shows that WP_Error. Of course that user input needs to be html escaped when displaying, but I'm not sure when would be the best time to do it.



    I have a choice about whether to:




    • Escape the message as I'm constructing the WP_Error, and the display code shows it as-is.


    • Don't worry about escaping when constructing the WP_Error, and in the display code fully escape all the WP_Error messages.



    Either would work, but if my plugin ends up interacting with other plugins and possibly displaying their WP_Error or vice-versa, I'd like to match whatever precedent exists in the Wordpress world.



    I had hoped the documentation would address this, but I didn't see anything on https://codex.wordpress.org/Class_Reference/WP_Error










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Jason Viers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      2












      2








      2








      This isn't about what html escaping is or how it's done, but if there's an established best practice about when to do it.



      I have some utility code in my plugin that may generate a WP_Error based on user input, and other display code that shows that WP_Error. Of course that user input needs to be html escaped when displaying, but I'm not sure when would be the best time to do it.



      I have a choice about whether to:




      • Escape the message as I'm constructing the WP_Error, and the display code shows it as-is.


      • Don't worry about escaping when constructing the WP_Error, and in the display code fully escape all the WP_Error messages.



      Either would work, but if my plugin ends up interacting with other plugins and possibly displaying their WP_Error or vice-versa, I'd like to match whatever precedent exists in the Wordpress world.



      I had hoped the documentation would address this, but I didn't see anything on https://codex.wordpress.org/Class_Reference/WP_Error










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Jason Viers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      This isn't about what html escaping is or how it's done, but if there's an established best practice about when to do it.



      I have some utility code in my plugin that may generate a WP_Error based on user input, and other display code that shows that WP_Error. Of course that user input needs to be html escaped when displaying, but I'm not sure when would be the best time to do it.



      I have a choice about whether to:




      • Escape the message as I'm constructing the WP_Error, and the display code shows it as-is.


      • Don't worry about escaping when constructing the WP_Error, and in the display code fully escape all the WP_Error messages.



      Either would work, but if my plugin ends up interacting with other plugins and possibly displaying their WP_Error or vice-versa, I'd like to match whatever precedent exists in the Wordpress world.



      I had hoped the documentation would address this, but I didn't see anything on https://codex.wordpress.org/Class_Reference/WP_Error







      plugins errors escaping






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Jason Viers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Jason Viers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 13 at 18:42







      Jason Viers













      New contributor




      Jason Viers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Jan 13 at 18:37









      Jason ViersJason Viers

      1134




      1134




      New contributor




      Jason Viers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Jason Viers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Jason Viers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          No, escaping should happen at the moment of output ( late escaping ) so that we know that it only occurs once. Double escaping can allow specially crafted output to break out.



          By escaping, we're talking about functions such as esc_html, wp_kses_post, esc_url, etc.



          Sanitizing functions and validating functions are not the same, e.g. sanitize_textfield. Sanitising cleans data, validation tests data, escaping enforces a type of data.



          Think of it like this for a triangle factory:





          • The validator tests the item is a triangle , and gives it a thumb up or down, it only observes. If it's triangle shaped, yes! If not, no. Validators are a good way to reject input, and should happen on input.


          • The sanitizer cleans the item, removes things that don't belong on a triangle on input. Other examples might be removing trailing spaces. If the item is meant to be a number it might strip out any letters and symbols. The end result is just a cleaner, easier to manage version of what went in.


          • The escaper enforces the triangle shape, it's like a cookie cutter with an triangle shaped hole in a triangle factory. It doesn't matter what goes in, a triangle is coming out, even if a square went in. Sure you might end up with a mangled broken thing that's triangle shaped, but triangles are what we intended and triangles are what we're getting


          Double escaping is bad because if we then take our broken square that's shaped like a triangle, flip it upside down, and run it through the cookie cutter a second time, we don't get a triangle, we get a hexagon. We didn't want hexagons!



          We can sanitize and validate as many times as we want, but we should only escape once, and it should happen at the moment of output, if not as close as possible to it.





          So since WP_Error does not output, and is not responsible for outputting, it should not perform any escaping internally, nor should its inputs be escaped. Validated/sanitized perhaps, but not escaped.



          If we did escape on input, we would either have to double escape, or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter. All it would take is a single plugin developer forgetting to escape on input. It's also a lot easier to escape in the one place that outputs, than to escape in the many places that input.



          So instead, the code that receives and outputs the WP_Error object is where the escaping should be, that way we escape on output safe in the knowledge that no early escaping has occurred, no double escaping happens, whether it's been escaped is not a problem we have to deal with, and the responsibility for escaping is clear and straight forward



          As for how to safely output a WP_Error object, either esc_html or wp_kses_post will suffice. The latter will allow tags such as <strong> etc. Generally, putting anything more complex in an error object than what you'd put into a post is a bad idea, WP_Error objects are structured data already






          share|improve this answer


























          • "or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter" This essentially answers my question. Definitely sounds like WP_Error cannot be assumed to contain html escaped content, therefore WP_Errors MUST be escaped when displayed.

            – Jason Viers
            2 days ago













          • And what with error messages that contain HTML tags? You can’t escape all messages during printing them - even WP doesn’t escape them during printing...

            – Krzysiek Dróżdż
            2 days ago






          • 1





            WP does escape in a lot of cases, and wp_kses and wp_kses_post are useful here when outputting. Eitherway you shouldn't be inserting styling into error messages, it's the responsibility of the code that renders the error object to do that. Perhaps at most a pre tag or a strong but nothing that couldn't appear in a post anyway

            – Tom J Nowell
            2 days ago













          • Thanks for mentioning wp_kses and wp_kses_post, that will be very useful and take all the sting out of the "escape at display time" method!

            – Jason Viers
            2 days ago



















          2














          It's a very good question.



          WP_Error class doesn't do anything with messages you set. So what you set is what you get ;)



          On the other hand, the error messages can contain HTML, so you can't escape all of them, when printing errors. For example here you get a message from wp-login.php file:



          $errors->add('empty_username', __('<strong>ERROR</strong>: Enter a username or email address.'));


          And to make things even harder - as you can see - it's passed through __() function, so after translation the message may contain even more HTML tags.



          All of that means that you should take care of escaping data that may be harmful and remember that errors can contain HTML tags when printing them.






          share|improve this answer
























          • This was the difficulty I was imagining - if my display code somehow ended up getting a hold of the WP_Error with that add()-ed message, it will display literal <strong> tags to the user. But it sounds like it's unsafe to assume that tags in WP_Error are "intentional from devs and safe", so it'll have to be escaped on display.

            – Jason Viers
            2 days ago











          • @JasonViers on the other hand, as you can see, some tags are intentional - even in WP core.

            – Krzysiek Dróżdż
            2 days ago



















          1














          Personally, I'd keep the error messages basically plain text and static (don't include the user's input) - from what I've seen, most plugins take this mindset of error messages being short text-only notes of what has gone wrong. This allows you to use messages like "Password is too short" vs "'MyPass' is to short of a password".



          If you need some HTML in the error message itself, I'd escape it on the way in.



          $error = new WP_Error();

          $message = "The correct tag is <strong></strong>";
          $html_ok_message = htmlspecialchars($message);

          $error->add($code, $html_ok_message, $data);


          You could escape them on the way out if you know all the possible errors encountered have no HTML that needs to be displayed. If you escape them all always when outputting, you'll likely end up with things like &lt;strong;Error&gt; Something went wrong in XY_Other_plugin .






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "110"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Jason Viers is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwordpress.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f325478%2fshould-messages-in-wp-error-already-be-html-escaped%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            No, escaping should happen at the moment of output ( late escaping ) so that we know that it only occurs once. Double escaping can allow specially crafted output to break out.



            By escaping, we're talking about functions such as esc_html, wp_kses_post, esc_url, etc.



            Sanitizing functions and validating functions are not the same, e.g. sanitize_textfield. Sanitising cleans data, validation tests data, escaping enforces a type of data.



            Think of it like this for a triangle factory:





            • The validator tests the item is a triangle , and gives it a thumb up or down, it only observes. If it's triangle shaped, yes! If not, no. Validators are a good way to reject input, and should happen on input.


            • The sanitizer cleans the item, removes things that don't belong on a triangle on input. Other examples might be removing trailing spaces. If the item is meant to be a number it might strip out any letters and symbols. The end result is just a cleaner, easier to manage version of what went in.


            • The escaper enforces the triangle shape, it's like a cookie cutter with an triangle shaped hole in a triangle factory. It doesn't matter what goes in, a triangle is coming out, even if a square went in. Sure you might end up with a mangled broken thing that's triangle shaped, but triangles are what we intended and triangles are what we're getting


            Double escaping is bad because if we then take our broken square that's shaped like a triangle, flip it upside down, and run it through the cookie cutter a second time, we don't get a triangle, we get a hexagon. We didn't want hexagons!



            We can sanitize and validate as many times as we want, but we should only escape once, and it should happen at the moment of output, if not as close as possible to it.





            So since WP_Error does not output, and is not responsible for outputting, it should not perform any escaping internally, nor should its inputs be escaped. Validated/sanitized perhaps, but not escaped.



            If we did escape on input, we would either have to double escape, or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter. All it would take is a single plugin developer forgetting to escape on input. It's also a lot easier to escape in the one place that outputs, than to escape in the many places that input.



            So instead, the code that receives and outputs the WP_Error object is where the escaping should be, that way we escape on output safe in the knowledge that no early escaping has occurred, no double escaping happens, whether it's been escaped is not a problem we have to deal with, and the responsibility for escaping is clear and straight forward



            As for how to safely output a WP_Error object, either esc_html or wp_kses_post will suffice. The latter will allow tags such as <strong> etc. Generally, putting anything more complex in an error object than what you'd put into a post is a bad idea, WP_Error objects are structured data already






            share|improve this answer


























            • "or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter" This essentially answers my question. Definitely sounds like WP_Error cannot be assumed to contain html escaped content, therefore WP_Errors MUST be escaped when displayed.

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago













            • And what with error messages that contain HTML tags? You can’t escape all messages during printing them - even WP doesn’t escape them during printing...

              – Krzysiek Dróżdż
              2 days ago






            • 1





              WP does escape in a lot of cases, and wp_kses and wp_kses_post are useful here when outputting. Eitherway you shouldn't be inserting styling into error messages, it's the responsibility of the code that renders the error object to do that. Perhaps at most a pre tag or a strong but nothing that couldn't appear in a post anyway

              – Tom J Nowell
              2 days ago













            • Thanks for mentioning wp_kses and wp_kses_post, that will be very useful and take all the sting out of the "escape at display time" method!

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago
















            2














            No, escaping should happen at the moment of output ( late escaping ) so that we know that it only occurs once. Double escaping can allow specially crafted output to break out.



            By escaping, we're talking about functions such as esc_html, wp_kses_post, esc_url, etc.



            Sanitizing functions and validating functions are not the same, e.g. sanitize_textfield. Sanitising cleans data, validation tests data, escaping enforces a type of data.



            Think of it like this for a triangle factory:





            • The validator tests the item is a triangle , and gives it a thumb up or down, it only observes. If it's triangle shaped, yes! If not, no. Validators are a good way to reject input, and should happen on input.


            • The sanitizer cleans the item, removes things that don't belong on a triangle on input. Other examples might be removing trailing spaces. If the item is meant to be a number it might strip out any letters and symbols. The end result is just a cleaner, easier to manage version of what went in.


            • The escaper enforces the triangle shape, it's like a cookie cutter with an triangle shaped hole in a triangle factory. It doesn't matter what goes in, a triangle is coming out, even if a square went in. Sure you might end up with a mangled broken thing that's triangle shaped, but triangles are what we intended and triangles are what we're getting


            Double escaping is bad because if we then take our broken square that's shaped like a triangle, flip it upside down, and run it through the cookie cutter a second time, we don't get a triangle, we get a hexagon. We didn't want hexagons!



            We can sanitize and validate as many times as we want, but we should only escape once, and it should happen at the moment of output, if not as close as possible to it.





            So since WP_Error does not output, and is not responsible for outputting, it should not perform any escaping internally, nor should its inputs be escaped. Validated/sanitized perhaps, but not escaped.



            If we did escape on input, we would either have to double escape, or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter. All it would take is a single plugin developer forgetting to escape on input. It's also a lot easier to escape in the one place that outputs, than to escape in the many places that input.



            So instead, the code that receives and outputs the WP_Error object is where the escaping should be, that way we escape on output safe in the knowledge that no early escaping has occurred, no double escaping happens, whether it's been escaped is not a problem we have to deal with, and the responsibility for escaping is clear and straight forward



            As for how to safely output a WP_Error object, either esc_html or wp_kses_post will suffice. The latter will allow tags such as <strong> etc. Generally, putting anything more complex in an error object than what you'd put into a post is a bad idea, WP_Error objects are structured data already






            share|improve this answer


























            • "or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter" This essentially answers my question. Definitely sounds like WP_Error cannot be assumed to contain html escaped content, therefore WP_Errors MUST be escaped when displayed.

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago













            • And what with error messages that contain HTML tags? You can’t escape all messages during printing them - even WP doesn’t escape them during printing...

              – Krzysiek Dróżdż
              2 days ago






            • 1





              WP does escape in a lot of cases, and wp_kses and wp_kses_post are useful here when outputting. Eitherway you shouldn't be inserting styling into error messages, it's the responsibility of the code that renders the error object to do that. Perhaps at most a pre tag or a strong but nothing that couldn't appear in a post anyway

              – Tom J Nowell
              2 days ago













            • Thanks for mentioning wp_kses and wp_kses_post, that will be very useful and take all the sting out of the "escape at display time" method!

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago














            2












            2








            2







            No, escaping should happen at the moment of output ( late escaping ) so that we know that it only occurs once. Double escaping can allow specially crafted output to break out.



            By escaping, we're talking about functions such as esc_html, wp_kses_post, esc_url, etc.



            Sanitizing functions and validating functions are not the same, e.g. sanitize_textfield. Sanitising cleans data, validation tests data, escaping enforces a type of data.



            Think of it like this for a triangle factory:





            • The validator tests the item is a triangle , and gives it a thumb up or down, it only observes. If it's triangle shaped, yes! If not, no. Validators are a good way to reject input, and should happen on input.


            • The sanitizer cleans the item, removes things that don't belong on a triangle on input. Other examples might be removing trailing spaces. If the item is meant to be a number it might strip out any letters and symbols. The end result is just a cleaner, easier to manage version of what went in.


            • The escaper enforces the triangle shape, it's like a cookie cutter with an triangle shaped hole in a triangle factory. It doesn't matter what goes in, a triangle is coming out, even if a square went in. Sure you might end up with a mangled broken thing that's triangle shaped, but triangles are what we intended and triangles are what we're getting


            Double escaping is bad because if we then take our broken square that's shaped like a triangle, flip it upside down, and run it through the cookie cutter a second time, we don't get a triangle, we get a hexagon. We didn't want hexagons!



            We can sanitize and validate as many times as we want, but we should only escape once, and it should happen at the moment of output, if not as close as possible to it.





            So since WP_Error does not output, and is not responsible for outputting, it should not perform any escaping internally, nor should its inputs be escaped. Validated/sanitized perhaps, but not escaped.



            If we did escape on input, we would either have to double escape, or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter. All it would take is a single plugin developer forgetting to escape on input. It's also a lot easier to escape in the one place that outputs, than to escape in the many places that input.



            So instead, the code that receives and outputs the WP_Error object is where the escaping should be, that way we escape on output safe in the knowledge that no early escaping has occurred, no double escaping happens, whether it's been escaped is not a problem we have to deal with, and the responsibility for escaping is clear and straight forward



            As for how to safely output a WP_Error object, either esc_html or wp_kses_post will suffice. The latter will allow tags such as <strong> etc. Generally, putting anything more complex in an error object than what you'd put into a post is a bad idea, WP_Error objects are structured data already






            share|improve this answer















            No, escaping should happen at the moment of output ( late escaping ) so that we know that it only occurs once. Double escaping can allow specially crafted output to break out.



            By escaping, we're talking about functions such as esc_html, wp_kses_post, esc_url, etc.



            Sanitizing functions and validating functions are not the same, e.g. sanitize_textfield. Sanitising cleans data, validation tests data, escaping enforces a type of data.



            Think of it like this for a triangle factory:





            • The validator tests the item is a triangle , and gives it a thumb up or down, it only observes. If it's triangle shaped, yes! If not, no. Validators are a good way to reject input, and should happen on input.


            • The sanitizer cleans the item, removes things that don't belong on a triangle on input. Other examples might be removing trailing spaces. If the item is meant to be a number it might strip out any letters and symbols. The end result is just a cleaner, easier to manage version of what went in.


            • The escaper enforces the triangle shape, it's like a cookie cutter with an triangle shaped hole in a triangle factory. It doesn't matter what goes in, a triangle is coming out, even if a square went in. Sure you might end up with a mangled broken thing that's triangle shaped, but triangles are what we intended and triangles are what we're getting


            Double escaping is bad because if we then take our broken square that's shaped like a triangle, flip it upside down, and run it through the cookie cutter a second time, we don't get a triangle, we get a hexagon. We didn't want hexagons!



            We can sanitize and validate as many times as we want, but we should only escape once, and it should happen at the moment of output, if not as close as possible to it.





            So since WP_Error does not output, and is not responsible for outputting, it should not perform any escaping internally, nor should its inputs be escaped. Validated/sanitized perhaps, but not escaped.



            If we did escape on input, we would either have to double escape, or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter. All it would take is a single plugin developer forgetting to escape on input. It's also a lot easier to escape in the one place that outputs, than to escape in the many places that input.



            So instead, the code that receives and outputs the WP_Error object is where the escaping should be, that way we escape on output safe in the knowledge that no early escaping has occurred, no double escaping happens, whether it's been escaped is not a problem we have to deal with, and the responsibility for escaping is clear and straight forward



            As for how to safely output a WP_Error object, either esc_html or wp_kses_post will suffice. The latter will allow tags such as <strong> etc. Generally, putting anything more complex in an error object than what you'd put into a post is a bad idea, WP_Error objects are structured data already







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago

























            answered Jan 13 at 23:19









            Tom J NowellTom J Nowell

            32.2k44796




            32.2k44796













            • "or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter" This essentially answers my question. Definitely sounds like WP_Error cannot be assumed to contain html escaped content, therefore WP_Errors MUST be escaped when displayed.

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago













            • And what with error messages that contain HTML tags? You can’t escape all messages during printing them - even WP doesn’t escape them during printing...

              – Krzysiek Dróżdż
              2 days ago






            • 1





              WP does escape in a lot of cases, and wp_kses and wp_kses_post are useful here when outputting. Eitherway you shouldn't be inserting styling into error messages, it's the responsibility of the code that renders the error object to do that. Perhaps at most a pre tag or a strong but nothing that couldn't appear in a post anyway

              – Tom J Nowell
              2 days ago













            • Thanks for mentioning wp_kses and wp_kses_post, that will be very useful and take all the sting out of the "escape at display time" method!

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago



















            • "or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter" This essentially answers my question. Definitely sounds like WP_Error cannot be assumed to contain html escaped content, therefore WP_Errors MUST be escaped when displayed.

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago













            • And what with error messages that contain HTML tags? You can’t escape all messages during printing them - even WP doesn’t escape them during printing...

              – Krzysiek Dróżdż
              2 days ago






            • 1





              WP does escape in a lot of cases, and wp_kses and wp_kses_post are useful here when outputting. Eitherway you shouldn't be inserting styling into error messages, it's the responsibility of the code that renders the error object to do that. Perhaps at most a pre tag or a strong but nothing that couldn't appear in a post anyway

              – Tom J Nowell
              2 days ago













            • Thanks for mentioning wp_kses and wp_kses_post, that will be very useful and take all the sting out of the "escape at display time" method!

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago

















            "or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter" This essentially answers my question. Definitely sounds like WP_Error cannot be assumed to contain html escaped content, therefore WP_Errors MUST be escaped when displayed.

            – Jason Viers
            2 days ago







            "or trust all WP_Error objects, which is a non-starter" This essentially answers my question. Definitely sounds like WP_Error cannot be assumed to contain html escaped content, therefore WP_Errors MUST be escaped when displayed.

            – Jason Viers
            2 days ago















            And what with error messages that contain HTML tags? You can’t escape all messages during printing them - even WP doesn’t escape them during printing...

            – Krzysiek Dróżdż
            2 days ago





            And what with error messages that contain HTML tags? You can’t escape all messages during printing them - even WP doesn’t escape them during printing...

            – Krzysiek Dróżdż
            2 days ago




            1




            1





            WP does escape in a lot of cases, and wp_kses and wp_kses_post are useful here when outputting. Eitherway you shouldn't be inserting styling into error messages, it's the responsibility of the code that renders the error object to do that. Perhaps at most a pre tag or a strong but nothing that couldn't appear in a post anyway

            – Tom J Nowell
            2 days ago







            WP does escape in a lot of cases, and wp_kses and wp_kses_post are useful here when outputting. Eitherway you shouldn't be inserting styling into error messages, it's the responsibility of the code that renders the error object to do that. Perhaps at most a pre tag or a strong but nothing that couldn't appear in a post anyway

            – Tom J Nowell
            2 days ago















            Thanks for mentioning wp_kses and wp_kses_post, that will be very useful and take all the sting out of the "escape at display time" method!

            – Jason Viers
            2 days ago





            Thanks for mentioning wp_kses and wp_kses_post, that will be very useful and take all the sting out of the "escape at display time" method!

            – Jason Viers
            2 days ago













            2














            It's a very good question.



            WP_Error class doesn't do anything with messages you set. So what you set is what you get ;)



            On the other hand, the error messages can contain HTML, so you can't escape all of them, when printing errors. For example here you get a message from wp-login.php file:



            $errors->add('empty_username', __('<strong>ERROR</strong>: Enter a username or email address.'));


            And to make things even harder - as you can see - it's passed through __() function, so after translation the message may contain even more HTML tags.



            All of that means that you should take care of escaping data that may be harmful and remember that errors can contain HTML tags when printing them.






            share|improve this answer
























            • This was the difficulty I was imagining - if my display code somehow ended up getting a hold of the WP_Error with that add()-ed message, it will display literal <strong> tags to the user. But it sounds like it's unsafe to assume that tags in WP_Error are "intentional from devs and safe", so it'll have to be escaped on display.

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago











            • @JasonViers on the other hand, as you can see, some tags are intentional - even in WP core.

              – Krzysiek Dróżdż
              2 days ago
















            2














            It's a very good question.



            WP_Error class doesn't do anything with messages you set. So what you set is what you get ;)



            On the other hand, the error messages can contain HTML, so you can't escape all of them, when printing errors. For example here you get a message from wp-login.php file:



            $errors->add('empty_username', __('<strong>ERROR</strong>: Enter a username or email address.'));


            And to make things even harder - as you can see - it's passed through __() function, so after translation the message may contain even more HTML tags.



            All of that means that you should take care of escaping data that may be harmful and remember that errors can contain HTML tags when printing them.






            share|improve this answer
























            • This was the difficulty I was imagining - if my display code somehow ended up getting a hold of the WP_Error with that add()-ed message, it will display literal <strong> tags to the user. But it sounds like it's unsafe to assume that tags in WP_Error are "intentional from devs and safe", so it'll have to be escaped on display.

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago











            • @JasonViers on the other hand, as you can see, some tags are intentional - even in WP core.

              – Krzysiek Dróżdż
              2 days ago














            2












            2








            2







            It's a very good question.



            WP_Error class doesn't do anything with messages you set. So what you set is what you get ;)



            On the other hand, the error messages can contain HTML, so you can't escape all of them, when printing errors. For example here you get a message from wp-login.php file:



            $errors->add('empty_username', __('<strong>ERROR</strong>: Enter a username or email address.'));


            And to make things even harder - as you can see - it's passed through __() function, so after translation the message may contain even more HTML tags.



            All of that means that you should take care of escaping data that may be harmful and remember that errors can contain HTML tags when printing them.






            share|improve this answer













            It's a very good question.



            WP_Error class doesn't do anything with messages you set. So what you set is what you get ;)



            On the other hand, the error messages can contain HTML, so you can't escape all of them, when printing errors. For example here you get a message from wp-login.php file:



            $errors->add('empty_username', __('<strong>ERROR</strong>: Enter a username or email address.'));


            And to make things even harder - as you can see - it's passed through __() function, so after translation the message may contain even more HTML tags.



            All of that means that you should take care of escaping data that may be harmful and remember that errors can contain HTML tags when printing them.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jan 13 at 20:37









            Krzysiek DróżdżKrzysiek Dróżdż

            14.6k52742




            14.6k52742













            • This was the difficulty I was imagining - if my display code somehow ended up getting a hold of the WP_Error with that add()-ed message, it will display literal <strong> tags to the user. But it sounds like it's unsafe to assume that tags in WP_Error are "intentional from devs and safe", so it'll have to be escaped on display.

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago











            • @JasonViers on the other hand, as you can see, some tags are intentional - even in WP core.

              – Krzysiek Dróżdż
              2 days ago



















            • This was the difficulty I was imagining - if my display code somehow ended up getting a hold of the WP_Error with that add()-ed message, it will display literal <strong> tags to the user. But it sounds like it's unsafe to assume that tags in WP_Error are "intentional from devs and safe", so it'll have to be escaped on display.

              – Jason Viers
              2 days ago











            • @JasonViers on the other hand, as you can see, some tags are intentional - even in WP core.

              – Krzysiek Dróżdż
              2 days ago

















            This was the difficulty I was imagining - if my display code somehow ended up getting a hold of the WP_Error with that add()-ed message, it will display literal <strong> tags to the user. But it sounds like it's unsafe to assume that tags in WP_Error are "intentional from devs and safe", so it'll have to be escaped on display.

            – Jason Viers
            2 days ago





            This was the difficulty I was imagining - if my display code somehow ended up getting a hold of the WP_Error with that add()-ed message, it will display literal <strong> tags to the user. But it sounds like it's unsafe to assume that tags in WP_Error are "intentional from devs and safe", so it'll have to be escaped on display.

            – Jason Viers
            2 days ago













            @JasonViers on the other hand, as you can see, some tags are intentional - even in WP core.

            – Krzysiek Dróżdż
            2 days ago





            @JasonViers on the other hand, as you can see, some tags are intentional - even in WP core.

            – Krzysiek Dróżdż
            2 days ago











            1














            Personally, I'd keep the error messages basically plain text and static (don't include the user's input) - from what I've seen, most plugins take this mindset of error messages being short text-only notes of what has gone wrong. This allows you to use messages like "Password is too short" vs "'MyPass' is to short of a password".



            If you need some HTML in the error message itself, I'd escape it on the way in.



            $error = new WP_Error();

            $message = "The correct tag is <strong></strong>";
            $html_ok_message = htmlspecialchars($message);

            $error->add($code, $html_ok_message, $data);


            You could escape them on the way out if you know all the possible errors encountered have no HTML that needs to be displayed. If you escape them all always when outputting, you'll likely end up with things like &lt;strong;Error&gt; Something went wrong in XY_Other_plugin .






            share|improve this answer




























              1














              Personally, I'd keep the error messages basically plain text and static (don't include the user's input) - from what I've seen, most plugins take this mindset of error messages being short text-only notes of what has gone wrong. This allows you to use messages like "Password is too short" vs "'MyPass' is to short of a password".



              If you need some HTML in the error message itself, I'd escape it on the way in.



              $error = new WP_Error();

              $message = "The correct tag is <strong></strong>";
              $html_ok_message = htmlspecialchars($message);

              $error->add($code, $html_ok_message, $data);


              You could escape them on the way out if you know all the possible errors encountered have no HTML that needs to be displayed. If you escape them all always when outputting, you'll likely end up with things like &lt;strong;Error&gt; Something went wrong in XY_Other_plugin .






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                Personally, I'd keep the error messages basically plain text and static (don't include the user's input) - from what I've seen, most plugins take this mindset of error messages being short text-only notes of what has gone wrong. This allows you to use messages like "Password is too short" vs "'MyPass' is to short of a password".



                If you need some HTML in the error message itself, I'd escape it on the way in.



                $error = new WP_Error();

                $message = "The correct tag is <strong></strong>";
                $html_ok_message = htmlspecialchars($message);

                $error->add($code, $html_ok_message, $data);


                You could escape them on the way out if you know all the possible errors encountered have no HTML that needs to be displayed. If you escape them all always when outputting, you'll likely end up with things like &lt;strong;Error&gt; Something went wrong in XY_Other_plugin .






                share|improve this answer













                Personally, I'd keep the error messages basically plain text and static (don't include the user's input) - from what I've seen, most plugins take this mindset of error messages being short text-only notes of what has gone wrong. This allows you to use messages like "Password is too short" vs "'MyPass' is to short of a password".



                If you need some HTML in the error message itself, I'd escape it on the way in.



                $error = new WP_Error();

                $message = "The correct tag is <strong></strong>";
                $html_ok_message = htmlspecialchars($message);

                $error->add($code, $html_ok_message, $data);


                You could escape them on the way out if you know all the possible errors encountered have no HTML that needs to be displayed. If you escape them all always when outputting, you'll likely end up with things like &lt;strong;Error&gt; Something went wrong in XY_Other_plugin .







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jan 13 at 20:45









                DACrosbyDACrosby

                32317




                32317






















                    Jason Viers is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Jason Viers is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Jason Viers is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Jason Viers is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to WordPress Development Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwordpress.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f325478%2fshould-messages-in-wp-error-already-be-html-escaped%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    An IMO inspired problem

                    Management

                    Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?