$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + f^k(x) f(y) + f^k(y)f(x) $
$begingroup$
Let $k>1$ be an integer.
Consider equations of type
$$f_k(x+y) = f_k(x) + f_k(y) + f_k^k(x) f_k(y) + f_k^k(y) f_k(x) , f(-z) = f(z), $$
where $f_k$ is the $k$ th function and $f_k^k $ is the $k$ th power of $f_k$.
Valid for all real $x,y,z$ and $f$ is real-analytic.
Consider the nonconstant solutions.
When considering $f_2$ I came to the conclusion that $f_2(z) = 0 $ is the only solution.
( this was achieved by contradictions while investigating---and equating---$f(-1),f(0),f(1),f(2),f(3), f(2) = f(1+1) = f(3-1) $ by using algebra )
As a side note I considered the julia sets of $f_kleft(2 operatorname{arc}f_k(z)right) = 2 z + 2 z^{k+1} $ , more specific if they are connected or not. For $k>4$ they are totally disconnected and otherwise they are totally connected. For $k = 2$ it is a circle shape. Not sure if it relates or not?
Notice $k$ needs to be even to have $f(-z) = - f(z) $.
Although odd $k$ might be intresting too if we drop that condition.
So I wonder about general case; for what even $k$ do we get a solution and when do we fail like The case $f_2$?
How does $f_k$ behave?
Probably like a double exponential ... but a bit more precise understanding would be nice.
Is there uniqueness?
To be a bit more concrete I particularly wonder about
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + f^4(x) f(y) + f^4(y)f(x) $$
and
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + f^6(x) f(y) + f^6(y)f(x). $$
Do any of those 2 equations have a nonconstant solution?
Note that those are around The switch from connected to disconnected associated Julia sets.
Another remark :
$$g(x + y) = g(x) + g(y) + g(x)g(y) $$
has the following solution $g(z)=exp(C z) - 1$.
Maybe this implies we should study instead
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + frac12left( f^k(x) f(y) + f^k(y)f(x) right)?? $$
The related Julia sets are similar btw.
Are there representations known for these functions or their functional inverses , like integral representations , differential equations , infinite sums , analogues to eulers addition theorem or gauss integral for The agm , continued fractions , ...
have “ very “similar things been studied before ?
( not Somos )
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems functional-equations analytic-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $k>1$ be an integer.
Consider equations of type
$$f_k(x+y) = f_k(x) + f_k(y) + f_k^k(x) f_k(y) + f_k^k(y) f_k(x) , f(-z) = f(z), $$
where $f_k$ is the $k$ th function and $f_k^k $ is the $k$ th power of $f_k$.
Valid for all real $x,y,z$ and $f$ is real-analytic.
Consider the nonconstant solutions.
When considering $f_2$ I came to the conclusion that $f_2(z) = 0 $ is the only solution.
( this was achieved by contradictions while investigating---and equating---$f(-1),f(0),f(1),f(2),f(3), f(2) = f(1+1) = f(3-1) $ by using algebra )
As a side note I considered the julia sets of $f_kleft(2 operatorname{arc}f_k(z)right) = 2 z + 2 z^{k+1} $ , more specific if they are connected or not. For $k>4$ they are totally disconnected and otherwise they are totally connected. For $k = 2$ it is a circle shape. Not sure if it relates or not?
Notice $k$ needs to be even to have $f(-z) = - f(z) $.
Although odd $k$ might be intresting too if we drop that condition.
So I wonder about general case; for what even $k$ do we get a solution and when do we fail like The case $f_2$?
How does $f_k$ behave?
Probably like a double exponential ... but a bit more precise understanding would be nice.
Is there uniqueness?
To be a bit more concrete I particularly wonder about
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + f^4(x) f(y) + f^4(y)f(x) $$
and
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + f^6(x) f(y) + f^6(y)f(x). $$
Do any of those 2 equations have a nonconstant solution?
Note that those are around The switch from connected to disconnected associated Julia sets.
Another remark :
$$g(x + y) = g(x) + g(y) + g(x)g(y) $$
has the following solution $g(z)=exp(C z) - 1$.
Maybe this implies we should study instead
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + frac12left( f^k(x) f(y) + f^k(y)f(x) right)?? $$
The related Julia sets are similar btw.
Are there representations known for these functions or their functional inverses , like integral representations , differential equations , infinite sums , analogues to eulers addition theorem or gauss integral for The agm , continued fractions , ...
have “ very “similar things been studied before ?
( not Somos )
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems functional-equations analytic-functions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is $f^k(x)$? k-fold composition? The k-th power? The k-th derivative?
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 7 at 8:48
$begingroup$
Sorry. It is The k th power. I edited a bit. Hope everything is clear now. @LutzL
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 11:29
$begingroup$
"Notice $ k $ needs to be even to have $ f ( − z ) = − f ( z ) $." But you've written the condition $ f ( - z ) = f ( z ) $ after the functional equation. Which one is of your interest?
$endgroup$
– Mohsen Shahriari
Jan 7 at 19:42
$begingroup$
Moshen : they both need to hold. That is The point.
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 20:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $k>1$ be an integer.
Consider equations of type
$$f_k(x+y) = f_k(x) + f_k(y) + f_k^k(x) f_k(y) + f_k^k(y) f_k(x) , f(-z) = f(z), $$
where $f_k$ is the $k$ th function and $f_k^k $ is the $k$ th power of $f_k$.
Valid for all real $x,y,z$ and $f$ is real-analytic.
Consider the nonconstant solutions.
When considering $f_2$ I came to the conclusion that $f_2(z) = 0 $ is the only solution.
( this was achieved by contradictions while investigating---and equating---$f(-1),f(0),f(1),f(2),f(3), f(2) = f(1+1) = f(3-1) $ by using algebra )
As a side note I considered the julia sets of $f_kleft(2 operatorname{arc}f_k(z)right) = 2 z + 2 z^{k+1} $ , more specific if they are connected or not. For $k>4$ they are totally disconnected and otherwise they are totally connected. For $k = 2$ it is a circle shape. Not sure if it relates or not?
Notice $k$ needs to be even to have $f(-z) = - f(z) $.
Although odd $k$ might be intresting too if we drop that condition.
So I wonder about general case; for what even $k$ do we get a solution and when do we fail like The case $f_2$?
How does $f_k$ behave?
Probably like a double exponential ... but a bit more precise understanding would be nice.
Is there uniqueness?
To be a bit more concrete I particularly wonder about
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + f^4(x) f(y) + f^4(y)f(x) $$
and
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + f^6(x) f(y) + f^6(y)f(x). $$
Do any of those 2 equations have a nonconstant solution?
Note that those are around The switch from connected to disconnected associated Julia sets.
Another remark :
$$g(x + y) = g(x) + g(y) + g(x)g(y) $$
has the following solution $g(z)=exp(C z) - 1$.
Maybe this implies we should study instead
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + frac12left( f^k(x) f(y) + f^k(y)f(x) right)?? $$
The related Julia sets are similar btw.
Are there representations known for these functions or their functional inverses , like integral representations , differential equations , infinite sums , analogues to eulers addition theorem or gauss integral for The agm , continued fractions , ...
have “ very “similar things been studied before ?
( not Somos )
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems functional-equations analytic-functions
$endgroup$
Let $k>1$ be an integer.
Consider equations of type
$$f_k(x+y) = f_k(x) + f_k(y) + f_k^k(x) f_k(y) + f_k^k(y) f_k(x) , f(-z) = f(z), $$
where $f_k$ is the $k$ th function and $f_k^k $ is the $k$ th power of $f_k$.
Valid for all real $x,y,z$ and $f$ is real-analytic.
Consider the nonconstant solutions.
When considering $f_2$ I came to the conclusion that $f_2(z) = 0 $ is the only solution.
( this was achieved by contradictions while investigating---and equating---$f(-1),f(0),f(1),f(2),f(3), f(2) = f(1+1) = f(3-1) $ by using algebra )
As a side note I considered the julia sets of $f_kleft(2 operatorname{arc}f_k(z)right) = 2 z + 2 z^{k+1} $ , more specific if they are connected or not. For $k>4$ they are totally disconnected and otherwise they are totally connected. For $k = 2$ it is a circle shape. Not sure if it relates or not?
Notice $k$ needs to be even to have $f(-z) = - f(z) $.
Although odd $k$ might be intresting too if we drop that condition.
So I wonder about general case; for what even $k$ do we get a solution and when do we fail like The case $f_2$?
How does $f_k$ behave?
Probably like a double exponential ... but a bit more precise understanding would be nice.
Is there uniqueness?
To be a bit more concrete I particularly wonder about
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + f^4(x) f(y) + f^4(y)f(x) $$
and
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + f^6(x) f(y) + f^6(y)f(x). $$
Do any of those 2 equations have a nonconstant solution?
Note that those are around The switch from connected to disconnected associated Julia sets.
Another remark :
$$g(x + y) = g(x) + g(y) + g(x)g(y) $$
has the following solution $g(z)=exp(C z) - 1$.
Maybe this implies we should study instead
$$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + frac12left( f^k(x) f(y) + f^k(y)f(x) right)?? $$
The related Julia sets are similar btw.
Are there representations known for these functions or their functional inverses , like integral representations , differential equations , infinite sums , analogues to eulers addition theorem or gauss integral for The agm , continued fractions , ...
have “ very “similar things been studied before ?
( not Somos )
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems functional-equations analytic-functions
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems functional-equations analytic-functions
edited Jan 7 at 19:49
user593746
asked Jan 7 at 5:34
mickmick
5,09022064
5,09022064
$begingroup$
What is $f^k(x)$? k-fold composition? The k-th power? The k-th derivative?
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 7 at 8:48
$begingroup$
Sorry. It is The k th power. I edited a bit. Hope everything is clear now. @LutzL
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 11:29
$begingroup$
"Notice $ k $ needs to be even to have $ f ( − z ) = − f ( z ) $." But you've written the condition $ f ( - z ) = f ( z ) $ after the functional equation. Which one is of your interest?
$endgroup$
– Mohsen Shahriari
Jan 7 at 19:42
$begingroup$
Moshen : they both need to hold. That is The point.
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 20:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is $f^k(x)$? k-fold composition? The k-th power? The k-th derivative?
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 7 at 8:48
$begingroup$
Sorry. It is The k th power. I edited a bit. Hope everything is clear now. @LutzL
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 11:29
$begingroup$
"Notice $ k $ needs to be even to have $ f ( − z ) = − f ( z ) $." But you've written the condition $ f ( - z ) = f ( z ) $ after the functional equation. Which one is of your interest?
$endgroup$
– Mohsen Shahriari
Jan 7 at 19:42
$begingroup$
Moshen : they both need to hold. That is The point.
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 20:13
$begingroup$
What is $f^k(x)$? k-fold composition? The k-th power? The k-th derivative?
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 7 at 8:48
$begingroup$
What is $f^k(x)$? k-fold composition? The k-th power? The k-th derivative?
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 7 at 8:48
$begingroup$
Sorry. It is The k th power. I edited a bit. Hope everything is clear now. @LutzL
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 11:29
$begingroup$
Sorry. It is The k th power. I edited a bit. Hope everything is clear now. @LutzL
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 11:29
$begingroup$
"Notice $ k $ needs to be even to have $ f ( − z ) = − f ( z ) $." But you've written the condition $ f ( - z ) = f ( z ) $ after the functional equation. Which one is of your interest?
$endgroup$
– Mohsen Shahriari
Jan 7 at 19:42
$begingroup$
"Notice $ k $ needs to be even to have $ f ( − z ) = − f ( z ) $." But you've written the condition $ f ( - z ) = f ( z ) $ after the functional equation. Which one is of your interest?
$endgroup$
– Mohsen Shahriari
Jan 7 at 19:42
$begingroup$
Moshen : they both need to hold. That is The point.
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 20:13
$begingroup$
Moshen : they both need to hold. That is The point.
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 20:13
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Fix a non-negative integer $k$ and $tinBbb R$. Let $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ be a function such that$$(1) f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)-frac{t}{2}left(f^k(x)f(y)+f(x)f^k(y)right)$$
for all $x,yin Bbb R$. (Here we interpret $0^0$ as $1$.) Plugging in $x,y=0$ in $(1)$, we have
$$f(0)big(1-tf^k(0)big)=0.$$
This shows that
$(i)$ $f(0)=0$,
$(ii)$ $tneq 0$, $k$ is odd, and $f(0)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$,
$(iii)$ $t> 0$, $k>0$ is even, and $f(0)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$, or
$(iv)$ $t=1$ and $k=0$.
We first deal with $(ii)$ and $(iii)$. Plugging in $y=0$ in $(1)$ yields
$$big(sqrt[k]{t}f(x)big)^k+big(sqrt[k]{t}f(x)big)-2=0$$
for all $xin Bbb R$. By Descartes' rule of signs, the polynomial $u^k+u-2=0$ has exactly one real root $u=1$ for odd $k$, and this polynomial has two real roots $u=1$ and $u=-epsilon_k$ for even $k$ (where $epsilon_k>1$ is the only positive root of $u^k-u-2=0$). For even $k>0$ and for $t>0$, suppose that there exists $cin Bbb R$ s.t. $f(a)=-frac{epsilon_k}{sqrt[k]{t}}$. Plugging in $c$ for both $x$ and $y$ gives
$$1<epsilon_k^2=epsilon_k(epsilon_k^k-2)in{1,-epsilon_k}.$$
This is absurd, so $c$ does not exist. Therefore, in both cases $(ii)$ and $(iii)$, the only solution is
$$(2) f(x)=frac1{sqrt[k]{t}} forall x$$
We now deal with the case $k=0$ separately (and this will complete the case $(iv)$ automatically). From $(1)$, we see that
$$f(x+y)=left(1-frac{t}{2}right)big(f(x)+f(y)big).$$
If $t=0$, we have Cauchy's functional equation, whose solutions are well-known and the only analytic solutions are the functions $f$ of the form $$(3) f(x)=m x$$ for some constant $m$. If $t=1$, taking $y=0$ we have the constant solution $$(4) f(x)=f(0) forall x.$$ If $tnotin{0,1}$, then $f(0)=0$. By taking $y=0$, $$(5) f(x)=0 forall x.$$
For the remaining part of this answer, we assume that $k>0$ and $f(0)=0$. If $t=0$, we get once again Cauchy's functional equation, and we already know the solutions. Suppose from now on that $tne0 $.
If $k=1$, we let $g(x)=1-tf(x)$. Then $$g(x+y)=1-tf(x+y)=1-tf(x)-tf(y)+t^2f(x)f(y)=g(x)g(y).$$
This is another well-known functional equation. Its solution is $g(x)=0$ for all $x$, or $g(x)=expbig(gamma(x)big)$ where $gamma$ is a solution to Cauchy's functional equation. In particular, this means that all analytic solutions are
$$(6) f(x)=frac1t forall x wedge f(x)=frac{1-exp(lambda x)}{t} forall x.$$
Suppose now that $k>1$. At this point I gave up on finding general solutions to $(1)$, but it is possible to show that the only analytic solution to $(1)$ is the zero function $f(x)=0$. To see this, take derivative of $(1)$ wrt $y$ to get
$$(7) f'(x+y)=f'(y)-frac{t}{2}f(x)f'(y)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right).$$
Putting $y=0$ we get
$$(8) f'(x)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right).$$
Using $(8)$, $(7)$ becomes
$$f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^k(x+y)right)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(y)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(x)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right)right).$$
By symmetry,
$$f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^k(x+y)right)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(y)left(f^{k-1}(y)+kf^{k-1}(x)right)right).$$
If $f'(0)ne 0$, then
begin{align}left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(y)right)&left(1-frac{t}{2}f(x)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right)right)\&=left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(y)left(f^{k-1}(y)+kf^{k-1}(x)right)right)end{align}
and so
$$f(x)f(y)Big(2f^{k-2}(x)-2f^{k-2}(y)-tf^{2k-2}(x)+tf^{2k-2}(y)Big)=0.$$
If $f$ is non-zero, then
$$2f^{k-2}(x)-2f^{k-2}(y)-tf^{2k-2}(x)+tf^{2k-2}(y)=0$$
for all $x,y$. Differentiating the previous equation wrt $y$ yields
$$2(k-2)f^{k-3}(x)f'(x)-(2k-2)tf^{2k-3}(x)f'(x)=0.$$
Observe that $f'$ is also non-zero. Therefore
$$2(k-2)-(2k-2)tf^{k}(x)=0$$
or
$$f^k(x)=frac{k-2}{(k-1)t}$$
so $f$ is constant, but this contradicts the fact that $f'$ is non-zero.
In conclusion, an analytic solution to $(1)$ is $f(x)=0$. There are exceptional solutions, depending on the parameters $t$ and $k$. These (analytic) solutions are listed below.
$(a)$ $t=0$: $f(x)=m x$.
$(b)$ $tneq 0$ and $k$ is odd: $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$.
$(c)$ $t>0$ and $k>0$ is even: $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$.
$(d)$ $t=1$ and $k=0$: $f(x)=kappa$.
$(e)$ $tne 0$ and $k=1$: $f(x)=frac1t$.
$(f)$ $tne 0$ and $k=1$: $f(x)=frac{1-exp(lambda x)}{t}$.
There are non-analytic solutions at least in the case $t=0$ and the case $tne 0$ with $k=1$. There may be non-analytic solutions in the case $tne 0$, $k>1$, and $f(0)=0$, but I have no idea.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have a feeling that when $tne 0$ and $k>1$, $f=0$ may be the only possible solution among all possible solutions (including non-analytic ones) that satisfy $f(0)=0$. (BTW, your case $(e)$ is already covered by $(b)$.)
$endgroup$
– user593746
Jan 8 at 11:55
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064689%2ffxy-fx-fy-fkx-fy-fkyfx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Fix a non-negative integer $k$ and $tinBbb R$. Let $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ be a function such that$$(1) f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)-frac{t}{2}left(f^k(x)f(y)+f(x)f^k(y)right)$$
for all $x,yin Bbb R$. (Here we interpret $0^0$ as $1$.) Plugging in $x,y=0$ in $(1)$, we have
$$f(0)big(1-tf^k(0)big)=0.$$
This shows that
$(i)$ $f(0)=0$,
$(ii)$ $tneq 0$, $k$ is odd, and $f(0)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$,
$(iii)$ $t> 0$, $k>0$ is even, and $f(0)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$, or
$(iv)$ $t=1$ and $k=0$.
We first deal with $(ii)$ and $(iii)$. Plugging in $y=0$ in $(1)$ yields
$$big(sqrt[k]{t}f(x)big)^k+big(sqrt[k]{t}f(x)big)-2=0$$
for all $xin Bbb R$. By Descartes' rule of signs, the polynomial $u^k+u-2=0$ has exactly one real root $u=1$ for odd $k$, and this polynomial has two real roots $u=1$ and $u=-epsilon_k$ for even $k$ (where $epsilon_k>1$ is the only positive root of $u^k-u-2=0$). For even $k>0$ and for $t>0$, suppose that there exists $cin Bbb R$ s.t. $f(a)=-frac{epsilon_k}{sqrt[k]{t}}$. Plugging in $c$ for both $x$ and $y$ gives
$$1<epsilon_k^2=epsilon_k(epsilon_k^k-2)in{1,-epsilon_k}.$$
This is absurd, so $c$ does not exist. Therefore, in both cases $(ii)$ and $(iii)$, the only solution is
$$(2) f(x)=frac1{sqrt[k]{t}} forall x$$
We now deal with the case $k=0$ separately (and this will complete the case $(iv)$ automatically). From $(1)$, we see that
$$f(x+y)=left(1-frac{t}{2}right)big(f(x)+f(y)big).$$
If $t=0$, we have Cauchy's functional equation, whose solutions are well-known and the only analytic solutions are the functions $f$ of the form $$(3) f(x)=m x$$ for some constant $m$. If $t=1$, taking $y=0$ we have the constant solution $$(4) f(x)=f(0) forall x.$$ If $tnotin{0,1}$, then $f(0)=0$. By taking $y=0$, $$(5) f(x)=0 forall x.$$
For the remaining part of this answer, we assume that $k>0$ and $f(0)=0$. If $t=0$, we get once again Cauchy's functional equation, and we already know the solutions. Suppose from now on that $tne0 $.
If $k=1$, we let $g(x)=1-tf(x)$. Then $$g(x+y)=1-tf(x+y)=1-tf(x)-tf(y)+t^2f(x)f(y)=g(x)g(y).$$
This is another well-known functional equation. Its solution is $g(x)=0$ for all $x$, or $g(x)=expbig(gamma(x)big)$ where $gamma$ is a solution to Cauchy's functional equation. In particular, this means that all analytic solutions are
$$(6) f(x)=frac1t forall x wedge f(x)=frac{1-exp(lambda x)}{t} forall x.$$
Suppose now that $k>1$. At this point I gave up on finding general solutions to $(1)$, but it is possible to show that the only analytic solution to $(1)$ is the zero function $f(x)=0$. To see this, take derivative of $(1)$ wrt $y$ to get
$$(7) f'(x+y)=f'(y)-frac{t}{2}f(x)f'(y)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right).$$
Putting $y=0$ we get
$$(8) f'(x)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right).$$
Using $(8)$, $(7)$ becomes
$$f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^k(x+y)right)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(y)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(x)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right)right).$$
By symmetry,
$$f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^k(x+y)right)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(y)left(f^{k-1}(y)+kf^{k-1}(x)right)right).$$
If $f'(0)ne 0$, then
begin{align}left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(y)right)&left(1-frac{t}{2}f(x)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right)right)\&=left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(y)left(f^{k-1}(y)+kf^{k-1}(x)right)right)end{align}
and so
$$f(x)f(y)Big(2f^{k-2}(x)-2f^{k-2}(y)-tf^{2k-2}(x)+tf^{2k-2}(y)Big)=0.$$
If $f$ is non-zero, then
$$2f^{k-2}(x)-2f^{k-2}(y)-tf^{2k-2}(x)+tf^{2k-2}(y)=0$$
for all $x,y$. Differentiating the previous equation wrt $y$ yields
$$2(k-2)f^{k-3}(x)f'(x)-(2k-2)tf^{2k-3}(x)f'(x)=0.$$
Observe that $f'$ is also non-zero. Therefore
$$2(k-2)-(2k-2)tf^{k}(x)=0$$
or
$$f^k(x)=frac{k-2}{(k-1)t}$$
so $f$ is constant, but this contradicts the fact that $f'$ is non-zero.
In conclusion, an analytic solution to $(1)$ is $f(x)=0$. There are exceptional solutions, depending on the parameters $t$ and $k$. These (analytic) solutions are listed below.
$(a)$ $t=0$: $f(x)=m x$.
$(b)$ $tneq 0$ and $k$ is odd: $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$.
$(c)$ $t>0$ and $k>0$ is even: $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$.
$(d)$ $t=1$ and $k=0$: $f(x)=kappa$.
$(e)$ $tne 0$ and $k=1$: $f(x)=frac1t$.
$(f)$ $tne 0$ and $k=1$: $f(x)=frac{1-exp(lambda x)}{t}$.
There are non-analytic solutions at least in the case $t=0$ and the case $tne 0$ with $k=1$. There may be non-analytic solutions in the case $tne 0$, $k>1$, and $f(0)=0$, but I have no idea.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have a feeling that when $tne 0$ and $k>1$, $f=0$ may be the only possible solution among all possible solutions (including non-analytic ones) that satisfy $f(0)=0$. (BTW, your case $(e)$ is already covered by $(b)$.)
$endgroup$
– user593746
Jan 8 at 11:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fix a non-negative integer $k$ and $tinBbb R$. Let $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ be a function such that$$(1) f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)-frac{t}{2}left(f^k(x)f(y)+f(x)f^k(y)right)$$
for all $x,yin Bbb R$. (Here we interpret $0^0$ as $1$.) Plugging in $x,y=0$ in $(1)$, we have
$$f(0)big(1-tf^k(0)big)=0.$$
This shows that
$(i)$ $f(0)=0$,
$(ii)$ $tneq 0$, $k$ is odd, and $f(0)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$,
$(iii)$ $t> 0$, $k>0$ is even, and $f(0)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$, or
$(iv)$ $t=1$ and $k=0$.
We first deal with $(ii)$ and $(iii)$. Plugging in $y=0$ in $(1)$ yields
$$big(sqrt[k]{t}f(x)big)^k+big(sqrt[k]{t}f(x)big)-2=0$$
for all $xin Bbb R$. By Descartes' rule of signs, the polynomial $u^k+u-2=0$ has exactly one real root $u=1$ for odd $k$, and this polynomial has two real roots $u=1$ and $u=-epsilon_k$ for even $k$ (where $epsilon_k>1$ is the only positive root of $u^k-u-2=0$). For even $k>0$ and for $t>0$, suppose that there exists $cin Bbb R$ s.t. $f(a)=-frac{epsilon_k}{sqrt[k]{t}}$. Plugging in $c$ for both $x$ and $y$ gives
$$1<epsilon_k^2=epsilon_k(epsilon_k^k-2)in{1,-epsilon_k}.$$
This is absurd, so $c$ does not exist. Therefore, in both cases $(ii)$ and $(iii)$, the only solution is
$$(2) f(x)=frac1{sqrt[k]{t}} forall x$$
We now deal with the case $k=0$ separately (and this will complete the case $(iv)$ automatically). From $(1)$, we see that
$$f(x+y)=left(1-frac{t}{2}right)big(f(x)+f(y)big).$$
If $t=0$, we have Cauchy's functional equation, whose solutions are well-known and the only analytic solutions are the functions $f$ of the form $$(3) f(x)=m x$$ for some constant $m$. If $t=1$, taking $y=0$ we have the constant solution $$(4) f(x)=f(0) forall x.$$ If $tnotin{0,1}$, then $f(0)=0$. By taking $y=0$, $$(5) f(x)=0 forall x.$$
For the remaining part of this answer, we assume that $k>0$ and $f(0)=0$. If $t=0$, we get once again Cauchy's functional equation, and we already know the solutions. Suppose from now on that $tne0 $.
If $k=1$, we let $g(x)=1-tf(x)$. Then $$g(x+y)=1-tf(x+y)=1-tf(x)-tf(y)+t^2f(x)f(y)=g(x)g(y).$$
This is another well-known functional equation. Its solution is $g(x)=0$ for all $x$, or $g(x)=expbig(gamma(x)big)$ where $gamma$ is a solution to Cauchy's functional equation. In particular, this means that all analytic solutions are
$$(6) f(x)=frac1t forall x wedge f(x)=frac{1-exp(lambda x)}{t} forall x.$$
Suppose now that $k>1$. At this point I gave up on finding general solutions to $(1)$, but it is possible to show that the only analytic solution to $(1)$ is the zero function $f(x)=0$. To see this, take derivative of $(1)$ wrt $y$ to get
$$(7) f'(x+y)=f'(y)-frac{t}{2}f(x)f'(y)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right).$$
Putting $y=0$ we get
$$(8) f'(x)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right).$$
Using $(8)$, $(7)$ becomes
$$f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^k(x+y)right)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(y)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(x)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right)right).$$
By symmetry,
$$f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^k(x+y)right)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(y)left(f^{k-1}(y)+kf^{k-1}(x)right)right).$$
If $f'(0)ne 0$, then
begin{align}left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(y)right)&left(1-frac{t}{2}f(x)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right)right)\&=left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(y)left(f^{k-1}(y)+kf^{k-1}(x)right)right)end{align}
and so
$$f(x)f(y)Big(2f^{k-2}(x)-2f^{k-2}(y)-tf^{2k-2}(x)+tf^{2k-2}(y)Big)=0.$$
If $f$ is non-zero, then
$$2f^{k-2}(x)-2f^{k-2}(y)-tf^{2k-2}(x)+tf^{2k-2}(y)=0$$
for all $x,y$. Differentiating the previous equation wrt $y$ yields
$$2(k-2)f^{k-3}(x)f'(x)-(2k-2)tf^{2k-3}(x)f'(x)=0.$$
Observe that $f'$ is also non-zero. Therefore
$$2(k-2)-(2k-2)tf^{k}(x)=0$$
or
$$f^k(x)=frac{k-2}{(k-1)t}$$
so $f$ is constant, but this contradicts the fact that $f'$ is non-zero.
In conclusion, an analytic solution to $(1)$ is $f(x)=0$. There are exceptional solutions, depending on the parameters $t$ and $k$. These (analytic) solutions are listed below.
$(a)$ $t=0$: $f(x)=m x$.
$(b)$ $tneq 0$ and $k$ is odd: $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$.
$(c)$ $t>0$ and $k>0$ is even: $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$.
$(d)$ $t=1$ and $k=0$: $f(x)=kappa$.
$(e)$ $tne 0$ and $k=1$: $f(x)=frac1t$.
$(f)$ $tne 0$ and $k=1$: $f(x)=frac{1-exp(lambda x)}{t}$.
There are non-analytic solutions at least in the case $t=0$ and the case $tne 0$ with $k=1$. There may be non-analytic solutions in the case $tne 0$, $k>1$, and $f(0)=0$, but I have no idea.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have a feeling that when $tne 0$ and $k>1$, $f=0$ may be the only possible solution among all possible solutions (including non-analytic ones) that satisfy $f(0)=0$. (BTW, your case $(e)$ is already covered by $(b)$.)
$endgroup$
– user593746
Jan 8 at 11:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fix a non-negative integer $k$ and $tinBbb R$. Let $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ be a function such that$$(1) f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)-frac{t}{2}left(f^k(x)f(y)+f(x)f^k(y)right)$$
for all $x,yin Bbb R$. (Here we interpret $0^0$ as $1$.) Plugging in $x,y=0$ in $(1)$, we have
$$f(0)big(1-tf^k(0)big)=0.$$
This shows that
$(i)$ $f(0)=0$,
$(ii)$ $tneq 0$, $k$ is odd, and $f(0)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$,
$(iii)$ $t> 0$, $k>0$ is even, and $f(0)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$, or
$(iv)$ $t=1$ and $k=0$.
We first deal with $(ii)$ and $(iii)$. Plugging in $y=0$ in $(1)$ yields
$$big(sqrt[k]{t}f(x)big)^k+big(sqrt[k]{t}f(x)big)-2=0$$
for all $xin Bbb R$. By Descartes' rule of signs, the polynomial $u^k+u-2=0$ has exactly one real root $u=1$ for odd $k$, and this polynomial has two real roots $u=1$ and $u=-epsilon_k$ for even $k$ (where $epsilon_k>1$ is the only positive root of $u^k-u-2=0$). For even $k>0$ and for $t>0$, suppose that there exists $cin Bbb R$ s.t. $f(a)=-frac{epsilon_k}{sqrt[k]{t}}$. Plugging in $c$ for both $x$ and $y$ gives
$$1<epsilon_k^2=epsilon_k(epsilon_k^k-2)in{1,-epsilon_k}.$$
This is absurd, so $c$ does not exist. Therefore, in both cases $(ii)$ and $(iii)$, the only solution is
$$(2) f(x)=frac1{sqrt[k]{t}} forall x$$
We now deal with the case $k=0$ separately (and this will complete the case $(iv)$ automatically). From $(1)$, we see that
$$f(x+y)=left(1-frac{t}{2}right)big(f(x)+f(y)big).$$
If $t=0$, we have Cauchy's functional equation, whose solutions are well-known and the only analytic solutions are the functions $f$ of the form $$(3) f(x)=m x$$ for some constant $m$. If $t=1$, taking $y=0$ we have the constant solution $$(4) f(x)=f(0) forall x.$$ If $tnotin{0,1}$, then $f(0)=0$. By taking $y=0$, $$(5) f(x)=0 forall x.$$
For the remaining part of this answer, we assume that $k>0$ and $f(0)=0$. If $t=0$, we get once again Cauchy's functional equation, and we already know the solutions. Suppose from now on that $tne0 $.
If $k=1$, we let $g(x)=1-tf(x)$. Then $$g(x+y)=1-tf(x+y)=1-tf(x)-tf(y)+t^2f(x)f(y)=g(x)g(y).$$
This is another well-known functional equation. Its solution is $g(x)=0$ for all $x$, or $g(x)=expbig(gamma(x)big)$ where $gamma$ is a solution to Cauchy's functional equation. In particular, this means that all analytic solutions are
$$(6) f(x)=frac1t forall x wedge f(x)=frac{1-exp(lambda x)}{t} forall x.$$
Suppose now that $k>1$. At this point I gave up on finding general solutions to $(1)$, but it is possible to show that the only analytic solution to $(1)$ is the zero function $f(x)=0$. To see this, take derivative of $(1)$ wrt $y$ to get
$$(7) f'(x+y)=f'(y)-frac{t}{2}f(x)f'(y)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right).$$
Putting $y=0$ we get
$$(8) f'(x)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right).$$
Using $(8)$, $(7)$ becomes
$$f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^k(x+y)right)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(y)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(x)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right)right).$$
By symmetry,
$$f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^k(x+y)right)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(y)left(f^{k-1}(y)+kf^{k-1}(x)right)right).$$
If $f'(0)ne 0$, then
begin{align}left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(y)right)&left(1-frac{t}{2}f(x)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right)right)\&=left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(y)left(f^{k-1}(y)+kf^{k-1}(x)right)right)end{align}
and so
$$f(x)f(y)Big(2f^{k-2}(x)-2f^{k-2}(y)-tf^{2k-2}(x)+tf^{2k-2}(y)Big)=0.$$
If $f$ is non-zero, then
$$2f^{k-2}(x)-2f^{k-2}(y)-tf^{2k-2}(x)+tf^{2k-2}(y)=0$$
for all $x,y$. Differentiating the previous equation wrt $y$ yields
$$2(k-2)f^{k-3}(x)f'(x)-(2k-2)tf^{2k-3}(x)f'(x)=0.$$
Observe that $f'$ is also non-zero. Therefore
$$2(k-2)-(2k-2)tf^{k}(x)=0$$
or
$$f^k(x)=frac{k-2}{(k-1)t}$$
so $f$ is constant, but this contradicts the fact that $f'$ is non-zero.
In conclusion, an analytic solution to $(1)$ is $f(x)=0$. There are exceptional solutions, depending on the parameters $t$ and $k$. These (analytic) solutions are listed below.
$(a)$ $t=0$: $f(x)=m x$.
$(b)$ $tneq 0$ and $k$ is odd: $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$.
$(c)$ $t>0$ and $k>0$ is even: $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$.
$(d)$ $t=1$ and $k=0$: $f(x)=kappa$.
$(e)$ $tne 0$ and $k=1$: $f(x)=frac1t$.
$(f)$ $tne 0$ and $k=1$: $f(x)=frac{1-exp(lambda x)}{t}$.
There are non-analytic solutions at least in the case $t=0$ and the case $tne 0$ with $k=1$. There may be non-analytic solutions in the case $tne 0$, $k>1$, and $f(0)=0$, but I have no idea.
$endgroup$
Fix a non-negative integer $k$ and $tinBbb R$. Let $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ be a function such that$$(1) f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)-frac{t}{2}left(f^k(x)f(y)+f(x)f^k(y)right)$$
for all $x,yin Bbb R$. (Here we interpret $0^0$ as $1$.) Plugging in $x,y=0$ in $(1)$, we have
$$f(0)big(1-tf^k(0)big)=0.$$
This shows that
$(i)$ $f(0)=0$,
$(ii)$ $tneq 0$, $k$ is odd, and $f(0)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$,
$(iii)$ $t> 0$, $k>0$ is even, and $f(0)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$, or
$(iv)$ $t=1$ and $k=0$.
We first deal with $(ii)$ and $(iii)$. Plugging in $y=0$ in $(1)$ yields
$$big(sqrt[k]{t}f(x)big)^k+big(sqrt[k]{t}f(x)big)-2=0$$
for all $xin Bbb R$. By Descartes' rule of signs, the polynomial $u^k+u-2=0$ has exactly one real root $u=1$ for odd $k$, and this polynomial has two real roots $u=1$ and $u=-epsilon_k$ for even $k$ (where $epsilon_k>1$ is the only positive root of $u^k-u-2=0$). For even $k>0$ and for $t>0$, suppose that there exists $cin Bbb R$ s.t. $f(a)=-frac{epsilon_k}{sqrt[k]{t}}$. Plugging in $c$ for both $x$ and $y$ gives
$$1<epsilon_k^2=epsilon_k(epsilon_k^k-2)in{1,-epsilon_k}.$$
This is absurd, so $c$ does not exist. Therefore, in both cases $(ii)$ and $(iii)$, the only solution is
$$(2) f(x)=frac1{sqrt[k]{t}} forall x$$
We now deal with the case $k=0$ separately (and this will complete the case $(iv)$ automatically). From $(1)$, we see that
$$f(x+y)=left(1-frac{t}{2}right)big(f(x)+f(y)big).$$
If $t=0$, we have Cauchy's functional equation, whose solutions are well-known and the only analytic solutions are the functions $f$ of the form $$(3) f(x)=m x$$ for some constant $m$. If $t=1$, taking $y=0$ we have the constant solution $$(4) f(x)=f(0) forall x.$$ If $tnotin{0,1}$, then $f(0)=0$. By taking $y=0$, $$(5) f(x)=0 forall x.$$
For the remaining part of this answer, we assume that $k>0$ and $f(0)=0$. If $t=0$, we get once again Cauchy's functional equation, and we already know the solutions. Suppose from now on that $tne0 $.
If $k=1$, we let $g(x)=1-tf(x)$. Then $$g(x+y)=1-tf(x+y)=1-tf(x)-tf(y)+t^2f(x)f(y)=g(x)g(y).$$
This is another well-known functional equation. Its solution is $g(x)=0$ for all $x$, or $g(x)=expbig(gamma(x)big)$ where $gamma$ is a solution to Cauchy's functional equation. In particular, this means that all analytic solutions are
$$(6) f(x)=frac1t forall x wedge f(x)=frac{1-exp(lambda x)}{t} forall x.$$
Suppose now that $k>1$. At this point I gave up on finding general solutions to $(1)$, but it is possible to show that the only analytic solution to $(1)$ is the zero function $f(x)=0$. To see this, take derivative of $(1)$ wrt $y$ to get
$$(7) f'(x+y)=f'(y)-frac{t}{2}f(x)f'(y)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right).$$
Putting $y=0$ we get
$$(8) f'(x)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right).$$
Using $(8)$, $(7)$ becomes
$$f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^k(x+y)right)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(y)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(x)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right)right).$$
By symmetry,
$$f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^k(x+y)right)=f'(0)left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(y)left(f^{k-1}(y)+kf^{k-1}(x)right)right).$$
If $f'(0)ne 0$, then
begin{align}left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(y)right)&left(1-frac{t}{2}f(x)left(f^{k-1}(x)+kf^{k-1}(y)right)right)\&=left(1-frac{t}{2}f^{k}(x)right)left(1-frac{t}{2}f(y)left(f^{k-1}(y)+kf^{k-1}(x)right)right)end{align}
and so
$$f(x)f(y)Big(2f^{k-2}(x)-2f^{k-2}(y)-tf^{2k-2}(x)+tf^{2k-2}(y)Big)=0.$$
If $f$ is non-zero, then
$$2f^{k-2}(x)-2f^{k-2}(y)-tf^{2k-2}(x)+tf^{2k-2}(y)=0$$
for all $x,y$. Differentiating the previous equation wrt $y$ yields
$$2(k-2)f^{k-3}(x)f'(x)-(2k-2)tf^{2k-3}(x)f'(x)=0.$$
Observe that $f'$ is also non-zero. Therefore
$$2(k-2)-(2k-2)tf^{k}(x)=0$$
or
$$f^k(x)=frac{k-2}{(k-1)t}$$
so $f$ is constant, but this contradicts the fact that $f'$ is non-zero.
In conclusion, an analytic solution to $(1)$ is $f(x)=0$. There are exceptional solutions, depending on the parameters $t$ and $k$. These (analytic) solutions are listed below.
$(a)$ $t=0$: $f(x)=m x$.
$(b)$ $tneq 0$ and $k$ is odd: $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$.
$(c)$ $t>0$ and $k>0$ is even: $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt[k]{t}}$.
$(d)$ $t=1$ and $k=0$: $f(x)=kappa$.
$(e)$ $tne 0$ and $k=1$: $f(x)=frac1t$.
$(f)$ $tne 0$ and $k=1$: $f(x)=frac{1-exp(lambda x)}{t}$.
There are non-analytic solutions at least in the case $t=0$ and the case $tne 0$ with $k=1$. There may be non-analytic solutions in the case $tne 0$, $k>1$, and $f(0)=0$, but I have no idea.
edited Jan 8 at 11:54
answered Jan 7 at 19:29
user614671
$begingroup$
I have a feeling that when $tne 0$ and $k>1$, $f=0$ may be the only possible solution among all possible solutions (including non-analytic ones) that satisfy $f(0)=0$. (BTW, your case $(e)$ is already covered by $(b)$.)
$endgroup$
– user593746
Jan 8 at 11:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a feeling that when $tne 0$ and $k>1$, $f=0$ may be the only possible solution among all possible solutions (including non-analytic ones) that satisfy $f(0)=0$. (BTW, your case $(e)$ is already covered by $(b)$.)
$endgroup$
– user593746
Jan 8 at 11:55
$begingroup$
I have a feeling that when $tne 0$ and $k>1$, $f=0$ may be the only possible solution among all possible solutions (including non-analytic ones) that satisfy $f(0)=0$. (BTW, your case $(e)$ is already covered by $(b)$.)
$endgroup$
– user593746
Jan 8 at 11:55
$begingroup$
I have a feeling that when $tne 0$ and $k>1$, $f=0$ may be the only possible solution among all possible solutions (including non-analytic ones) that satisfy $f(0)=0$. (BTW, your case $(e)$ is already covered by $(b)$.)
$endgroup$
– user593746
Jan 8 at 11:55
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064689%2ffxy-fx-fy-fkx-fy-fkyfx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What is $f^k(x)$? k-fold composition? The k-th power? The k-th derivative?
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 7 at 8:48
$begingroup$
Sorry. It is The k th power. I edited a bit. Hope everything is clear now. @LutzL
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 11:29
$begingroup$
"Notice $ k $ needs to be even to have $ f ( − z ) = − f ( z ) $." But you've written the condition $ f ( - z ) = f ( z ) $ after the functional equation. Which one is of your interest?
$endgroup$
– Mohsen Shahriari
Jan 7 at 19:42
$begingroup$
Moshen : they both need to hold. That is The point.
$endgroup$
– mick
Jan 7 at 20:13